Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
 arrow  CME course
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Dentali, F.
space
  arrow  Crowther, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REVIEW

Meta-analysis: Anticoagulant Prophylaxis to Prevent Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients

right arrow Francesco Dentali, MD; James D. Douketis, MD; Monica Gianni, MD; Wendy Lim, MD; and Mark A. Crowther, MD, MSc

20 February 2007 | Volume 146 Issue 4 | Pages 278-288

Background: Underutilization of anticoagulant prophylaxis may be due to lack of evidence that prophylaxis prevents clinically important outcomes in hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Purpose: To assess the effects of anticoagulant prophylaxis in reducing clinically important outcomes in hospitalized medical patients.

Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to September 2006 without language restrictions.

Study Selection: Randomized trials comparing anticoagulant prophylaxis with no treatment in hospitalized medical patients.

Data Extraction: Any symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), fatal PE, symptomatic deep venous thrombosis, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding. Pooled relative risks and associated 95% CIs were calculated. For treatment effects that were statistically significant, the authors determined the absolute risk reduction and the number needed to treat for benefit (NNTB) to prevent an outcome.

Data Synthesis: 9 studies (n = 19 958) were included. During anticoagulant prophylaxis, patients had significant reductions in any PE (relative risk, 0.43 [CI, 0.26 to 0.71]; absolute risk reduction, 0.29%; NNTB, 345) and fatal PE (relative risk, 0.38 [CI, 0.21 to 0.69]; absolute risk reduction, 0.25%; NNTB, 400), a nonsignificant reduction in symptomatic deep venous thrombosis (relative risk, 0.47 [CI, 0.22 to 1.00]), and a nonsignificant increase in major bleeding (relative risk, 1.32 [CI, 0.73 to 2.37]). Anticoagulant prophylaxis had no effect on all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.97 [CI, 0.79 to 1.19]).

Limitations: 2 of 9 included studies were not double-blind.

Conclusions: Anticoagulant prophylaxis is effective in preventing symptomatic venous thromboembolism during anticoagulant prophylaxis in at-risk hospitalized medical patients. Additional research is needed to determine the risk for venous thromboembolism in these patients after prophylaxis has been stopped.


Editors' Notes
space

Context

  • Anticoagulant prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients is better established in surgical practice than in medical practice, in part because of the lack of convincing clinical trial evidence in hospitalized medical patients.

Contributions

  • The authors found 9 controlled, randomized trials of currently recommended unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin prophylaxis regimens in hospitalized medical patients. Prophylaxis decreased the rate of pulmonary embolism, including fatal pulmonary emboli, by one half—a statistically significant reduction. Prophylaxis did not change other outcomes, including major bleeding.

Caution

  • Methods to identify good candidates for prophylaxis do not yet exist.

Implications

  • Anticoagulant prophylaxis substantially reduces the risk for venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients.

—The Editors

 

Author and Article Information
space

From McMaster University and St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Qilong Yi for his helpful review of and contribution to the manuscript.

Grant Support: Dr. Crowther is a Career Investigator of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. Dr. Lim holds a Mentorship award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Consultancies: J.D. Douketis (Agen Biomedical), M.A. Crowther (Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer Inc., Leo Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Organon, Artisian Therapeutics); Honoraria: J.D. Douketis (Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer Inc., Leo Pharma), M.A. Crowther (Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer Inc., Leo Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Organon Artisian Therapeutics); Grants received: M.A. Crowther (Sanofi-Aventis, Pfizer Inc., Leo Laboratories, GlaxoSmithKline, Organon, Artisian Therapeutics).

Requests for Single Reprints: James D. Douketis, MD, St. Joseph's Hospital, Room F-544, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Ontario, Canada; e-mail, jdouket{at}mcmaster.ca.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Dentali and Gianni: Inusbria University, Viale Borri 57, 21100 Varese, Italy.

Drs. Douketis, Lim, and Crowther: McMaster University, 50 Charleton Avenue East, Hamilton L8N 4A6, Ontario, Canada.


Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Hospitalized Medical Patients
Frank A. Lederle, Roderick MacDonald, AND Timothy J. Wilt
Annals 2007 147: 523-524. [Full Text]  

Letters
Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Hospitalized Medical Patients
Mark A. Crowther, Francesco Dentali, Wendy Lim, AND James D. Douketis
Annals 2007 147: 524. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
J. W. Eikelboom
Effect of fondaparinux 2.5 mg once daily on mortality: a meta-analysis of phase III randomized trials of venous thromboembolism prevention
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., April 1, 2008; 10(suppl_C): C8 - C13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
F. A. Lederle, R. MacDonald, and T. J. Wilt
Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Hospitalized Medical Patients
Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 523 - 524.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
G. Piazza, A. Seddighzadeh, and S. Z. Goldhaber
Double Trouble for 2,609 Hospitalized Medical Patients Who Developed Deep Vein Thrombosis: Prophylaxis Omitted More Often and Pulmonary Embolism More Frequent
Chest, August 1, 2007; 132(2): 554 - 561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Z. Goldhaber
Outpatient Venous Thromboembolism: A Common But Often Preventable Public Health Threat
Arch Intern Med, July 23, 2007; 167(14): 1451 - 1452.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. Calderon-Gerstein, G. Famularo, G. Minisola, C. De Simone, and C. W. Francis
Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
N. Engl. J. Med., July 19, 2007; 357(3): 304 - 306.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. W. Francis
Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medical Patients
N. Engl. J. Med., April 5, 2007; 356(14): 1438 - 1444.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch GeneralHome page
Prophylactic Anticoagulation Effective in Medical Inpatients
Journal Watch (General), March 15, 2007; 2007(315): 2 - 2.
[Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Anticoagulant Prophylaxis for Hospitalized Medical Patients
Frank A. Lederle, et al.
Annals Online, 1 Mar 2007 [Full text]
Efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients
Mark A. Crowther, et al.
Annals Online, 29 May 2007 [Full text]
Substantially Misleading
Steven L. Shumak
Annals Online, 1 Jun 2007 [Full text]



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2007 by the American College of Physicians.