Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 September 2006 | Volume 145 Issue 6 | Pages 426-434
Background: Many dispensing errors made in hospital pharmacies can harm patients. Some hospitals are investing in bar code technology to reduce these errors, but data about its efficacy are limited.
Objective: To evaluate whether implementation of bar code technology reduced dispensing errors and potential adverse drug events (ADEs).
Design: Before-and-after study using direct observations.
Setting: Hospital pharmacy at a 735-bed tertiary care academic medical center.
Intervention: A bar codeassisted dispensing system was implemented in 3 configurations. In 2 configurations, all doses were scanned once during the dispensing process. In the third configuration, only 1 dose was scanned if several doses of the same medication were being dispensed.
Measurements: Target dispensing errors, defined as dispensing errors that bar code technology was designed to address, and target potential ADEs, defined as target dispensing errors that can harm patients.
Results: In the pre and postbar code implementation periods, the authors observed 115 164 and 253 984 dispensed medication doses, respectively. Overall, the rates of target potential ADEs and all potential ADEs decreased by 74% and 63%, respectively. Of the 3 configurations of bar code technology studied, the 2 configurations that required staff to scan all doses had a 93% to 96% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and 86% to 97% relative reduction in the incidence of potential ADEs (P < 0.001). However, the configuration that did not require scanning of every dose had only a 60% relative reduction in the incidence of target dispensing errors (P < 0.001) and an increased (by 2.4-fold) incidence of target potential ADEs (P = 0.014). There were several potentially life-threatening ADEs involving intravenous dopamine and intravenous heparin in that configuration.
Limitations: The authors used surrogate outcomes; did not mask assessors to the purpose of study; and excluded the controlled substance fill process (a process with low error rates at baseline) from the study, which may bias the combined decrease in error rates toward a larger magnitude.
Conclusions: The overall rates of dispensing errors and potential ADEs substantially decreased after implementing bar code technology. However, the technology should be configured to scan every dose during the dispensing process.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Cautions
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Partners Information Systems, Boston, Massachusetts.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Judy Hayes, RN, and Anne Bane, RN, for their support throughout the project; E. John Orav, PhD, for his editorial comments and assistance with statistical analyses; and Brandon Hays and Robin Johnson for their assistance with data analysis.
Grant Support: By the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS14053-02).
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Consultancies: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health); Honoraria: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health); Grants received: D.W. Bates (Cardinal Health).
Requests for Single Reprints: Eric G. Poon, MD, MPH, Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02120; e-mail, epoon{at}partners.org.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Poon, Rothschild, Bates, and Gandhi; Ms. Featherstone; and Ms. Keohane: Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA 02120.
Drs. Cina and Patel and Mr. Churchill: Pharmacy Services, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02120.
Dr. Whittemore: Administration Building, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02120. IMPROVING PATIENT CARE
Medication Dispensing Errors and Potential Adverse Drug Events before and after Implementing Bar Code Technology in the Pharmacy
![]()
![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Koppel, T. Wetterneck, J. L. Telles, and B.-T. Karsh Workarounds to Barcode Medication Administration Systems: Their Occurrences, Causes, and Threats to Patient Safety J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2008; 15(4): 408 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E N de Vries, M A Ramrattan, S M Smorenburg, D J Gouma, and M A Boermeester The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2008; 17(3): 216 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Cescon and E. Etchells Barcoded Medication Administration: A Last Line of Defense JAMA, May 14, 2008; 299(18): 2200 - 2202. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Greenwood, P. M. Szumita, and M. Pendergrass Conversion to insulin devices in the inpatient setting Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2008; 65(8): 698 - 699. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Karnon, A. McIntosh, J. Dean, P. Bath, A. Hutchinson, J. Oakley, N. Thomas, P. Pratt, L. Freeman-Parry, B.-T. Karsh, et al. Modelling the expected net benefits of interventions to reduce the burden of medication errors J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 85 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Morriss Jr Adverse Medical Events in the NICU: Epidemiology and Prevention NeoReviews, January 1, 2008; 9(1): e8 - e23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. FitzHenry, J. F. Peterson, M. Arrieta, L. R. Waitman, J. S. Schildcrout, and R. A. Miller Medication Administration Discrepancies Persist Despite Electronic Ordering J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2007; 14(6): 756 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Fanikos, A. Erickson, K. E. Munz, M. D. Sanborn, B. C. Ludwig, and T. Van Hassel Observations on the use of ready-to-use and point-of-care activated parenteral products in automated dispensing cabinets in U.S. hospitals Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., October 1, 2007; 64(19): 2037 - 2043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. I. Harrison, R. Koppel, and S. Bar-Lev Unintended Consequences of Information Technologies in Health Care An Interactive Sociotechnical Analysis J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2007; 14(5): 542 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. C. Vermeulen, S. S. Rough, T. S. Thielke, R. R. Shane, M. F. Ivey, B. W. Woodward, P. G. Pierpaoli, S. M. Thomley, C. A. Borr, and D. A. Zilz Strategic approach for improving the medication-use process in health systems: The high-performance pharmacy practice framework Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., August 15, 2007; 64(16): 1699 - 1710. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. Bates Preventing medication errors: A summary Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., July 15, 2007; 64(14_Supplement_9): S3 - S9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Maviglia, J. Y. Yoo, C. Franz, E. Featherstone, W. Churchill, D. W. Bates, T. K. Gandhi, and E. G. Poon Cost-Benefit Analysis of a Hospital Pharmacy Bar Code Solution Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 788 - 794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||