Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 September 2006 | Volume 145 Issue 5 | Pages 361-363
In an article published in Annals of Internal Medicine in 2001, Redelmeier and Singh reported that Academy Awardwinning actors and actresses lived almost 4 years longer than their less successful peers. However, the statistical method used to derive this statistically significant difference gave winners an unfair advantage because it credited an Oscar winner's years of life before winning toward survival subsequent to winning. When the authors of the current article reanalyzed the data using methods that avoided this "immortal time" bias, the survival advantage was closer to 1 year and was not statistically significant. The type of bias in Redelmeier and Singh's study is not limited to longevity comparisons of persons who reach different ranks within their profession; it can, and often does, occur in nonexperimental studies of life- or time-extending benefits of medical interventions. The current authors suggest ways in which researchers and readers may avoid and recognize this bias.
Author and Article Information
From McGill University and Montréal General Hospital, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Corresponding Author: James A. Hanley, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Québec H3A 1A2, Canada; e-mail, james.hanley{at}mcgill.ca.
Current Author Addresses: Ms. Sylvestre and Huszti and Dr. Hanley: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 1020 Pine Avenue West, Montréal, Québec H3A 1A2, Canada. ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
Do Oscar Winners Live Longer than Less Successful Peers? A Reanalysis of the Evidence
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Z. Shariff, M. S. Cuerden, A. K. Jain, and A. X. Garg The Secret of Immortal Time Bias in Epidemiologic Studies J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 19(5): 841 - 843. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Brotman and P. K. Lindenauer Length of Stay and Mortality in Pulmonary Embolism: High Time for Evidence-Based Discharge Criteria Arch Intern Med, April 14, 2008; 168(7): 683 - 684. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Suissa Immortal Time Bias in Pharmacoepidemiology Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2008; 167(4): 492 - 499. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Netzer, C. V. Shah, T. J. Iwashyna, P. N. Lanken, B. Finkel, B. Fuchs, W. Guo, and J. D. Christie Association of RBC Transfusion With Mortality in Patients With Acute Lung Injury Chest, October 1, 2007; 132(4): 1116 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Huiart and M.-P. Sylvestre Re: Pregnancies, Breastfeeding, and Breast Cancer Risk in the International BRCA1/2 Carrier Cohort Study (IBCCS) J Natl Cancer Inst, July 18, 2007; 99(14): 1130 - 1131. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Laine, S. N. Goodman, M. E. Griswold, and H. C. Sox Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust Ann Intern Med, March 20, 2007; 146(6): 450 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Redelmeier and S. M. Singh Reanalysis of survival of OSCAR winners. Ann Intern Med, September 5, 2006; 145(5): 392 - 392. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goodman and H. C. Sox Reanalysis of survival of OSCAR winners. Ann Intern Med, September 5, 2006; 145(5): 392 - 393. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||