Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 August 2006 | Volume 145 Issue 3 | Pages 157-164
Background: The use of nonheart-beating donors could help shorten the list of patients who are waiting for a kidney transplant. Several reports describe acceptable results of transplantations from nonheart-beating donors who had in-hospital cardiac arrest, but few reports describe results of transplantations from nonheart-beating donors who had cardiac arrest that occurred outside of the hospital (Maastricht type I and type II donors).
Objective: To compare graft survival rates among patients receiving kidneys from heart-beating donors versus type I or type II nonheart-beating donors.
Design: Retrospective cohort study of transplantations performed from January 1989 to December 2004.
Setting: Kidney transplant program of a teaching hospital in Madrid, Spain.
Patients: 320 patients who received a kidney transplant from nonheart-beating donors (273 type I donors and 47 type II donors) and 584 patients who received a kidney transplant from heart-beating donors divided into 2 groups according to donor age (age <60 years [n = 458] and age
Measurements: The primary outcome measure was graft survival. The median follow-up time was 68 months (range, 9 to 198 months).
Results: One- and 5-year graft survival rates were 90.7% and 85.5%, respectively, for transplants from heart-beating donors younger than 60 years of age; 79.8% and 73.3%, respectively, for transplants from heart-beating donors 60 years of age or older (P < 0.001); and 87.4% and 82.1%, respectively, for transplants from nonheart-beating donors (P = 0.22 [vs. those from heart-beating donors < 60 years of age] and P = 0.014 [vs. those from heart-beating donors
Limitations: This single-site, observational study was retrospective, and immunosuppressive therapy regimens given to transplant recipients varied over time.
Conclusions: Outcomes of transplants from nonheart-beating donors and younger heart-beating donors are similar, and results for transplants from nonheart-beating donors improved compared with those from older heart-beating donors. On the basis of these results, the authors encourage other transplant units to adopt the use of type I and type II nonheart-beating donors.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Cautions
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense, and Servicio de Atención Municipal de Urgencias de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Ana I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, MD, PhD, Nephrology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain; e-mail, sanchezfruct{at}telefonica.net.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Sánchez-Fructuoso, Marques, Prats, Conesa, Calvo, and Barrientos: Nephrology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Dr. Pérez-Contín: Surgery Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Dr. Blazquez: Urology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Dr. Fernández: Investigation Unit, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Dr. Corral: SAMUR, Plaza de Legazpi s/n, 28010 Madrid, Spain.
Drs. Del Río and Núñez: Transplant Coordination, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Avenida Martín Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, A. Barrientos.
Drafting of the article: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, A. Barrientos.
Final approval of the article: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, M. Marques, D. Prats, J. Conesa, N. Calvo, M.J. Pérez-Contín, J. Blazquez, C. Fernández, E. Corral, F. Del Río, J.R. Núñez, A. Barrientos.
Provision of study materials or patients: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, M. Marques, D. Prats, J. Conesa, N. Calvo, M.J. Pérez-Contín, J. Blazquez, C. Fernández, E. Corral, F. Del Río, J.R. Núñez, A. Barrientos.
Statistical expertise: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, C. Fernández.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: A.I. Sánchez-Fructuoso, N. Calvo, M.J Pérez-Contín.
Collection and assembly of data: N. Calvo. ARTICLE
Victims of Cardiac Arrest Occurring Outside the Hospital: A Source of Transplantable Kidneys
60 years [n = 126]).
60 years of age]). Graft survival did not differ between patients who received kidneys from heart-beating donors younger than 60 years of age and patients who received kidneys from nonheart-beating donors.
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. W. Bottiger, E. Popp, P. Teschendorf, M. Hauswald, A. E. Ajani, R. Waksman, D. Mayer, S. F. Li, P. Morrissey, K. O'Connor, et al. Termination of resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N. Engl. J. Med., November 23, 2006; 355(21): 2257 - 2258. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Childress How can we ethically increase the supply of transplantable organs? Ann Intern Med, August 1, 2006; 145(3): 224 - 225. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||