Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Atkins, D.
space
  arrow  Slutsky, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

CHALLENGES OF SUMMARIZING BETTER INFORMATION FOR BETTER HEALTH: THE EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Mark Helfand, MD, MPH; Sally Morton, PhD; Eliseo Guallar, MD, PhD; and Cynthia Mulrow, MD, MSc, Editors

Better Information for Better Health Care: The Evidence-based Practice Center Program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

right arrow David Atkins, MD, MPH; Kenneth Fink, MD, MGA, MPH; and Jean Slutsky, PA, MSPH

21 June 2005 | Volume 142 Issue 12 Part 2 | Pages 1035-1041

To provide decision makers with the best available evidence, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality established a network of Evidence-based Practice Centers across North America. The centers perform systematic reviews on important questions posed by partner organizations about clinical, organizational, and policy interventions in health care. The Agency works closely with partners and other decision maker s to help translate that evidence into practice or policy. In this paper, we review important lessons we have learned over the past 7 years about how to increase the efficiency and impact of systematic reviews. Lessons concern selecting the right topics and scope, working effectively with partners, and balancing consistency and flexibility in methods. We examine continuing evolutions of the program and the impact of planned work on comparative effectiveness performed as part of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the official policy of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: Authors of this paper have received funding for Evidence-based Practice Center reports.

Requests for Single Reprints: David Atkins, MD, MPH, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850; e-mail, datkins{at}ahrq.gov.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Atkins and Fink and Ms. Slutsky: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. Helfand, S. Morton, E. Guallar, and C. Mulrow
A Guide to This Supplement
Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1033 - 1034.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. L. Norris and D. Atkins
Challenges in Using Nonrandomized Studies in Systematic Reviews of Treatment Interventions
Ann Intern Med, June 21, 2005; 142(12_Part_2): 1112 - 1119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence-based Practice and Patient Involvement
Alain Braillon, et al.
Annals Online, 15 Jul 2005 [Full text]



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | Audio/Video | CME | Collections | In the Clinic | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2005 by the American College of Physicians.