Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
Originally published on July 12, 2004.
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
All Versions of this Article:
  arrow 141/5/391 (most recent)
  arrow 0000605-200409070-00100v1
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Doherty, R. B.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES

Assessing the New Medicare Prescription Drug Law

right arrow Robert B. Doherty, BA

7 September 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 5 | Pages 391-395

The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) is the product of a political compromise to attract moderate Republicans and enough Democrats without losing Republican conservatives. The compromise offered more private health plans to beneficiaries while maintaining and improving traditional Medicare's benefits. This compromise did not settle the debate over the legislation, which is a major issue in the 2004 elections. Voters poorly understand the law because of its complexity. In this paper, I explain how the policy decisions made by the U.S. Congress have contributed to the law's complexity and controversy. I examine the new private health plan options that will be offered to beneficiaries, improvements made to traditional Medicare, and the impact of introducing income-based determinations into Medicare. I also discuss the impact of the drug benefit on beneficiaries in different income and assets categories and Congress's decision to prohibit the federal government from directly negotiating prices with drug manufacturers. I conclude by assessing the major claims made by critics and proponents. Both might be more circumspect in their assessments of the law's impact, since it is impossible to predict how a law of such complexity, with so many human variables, will work out in the end. The MMA is a worthwhile but imperfect effort to extend drug coverage to seniors who are most in need. It deserves neither condemnation nor indiscriminate praise but instead a commitment to help it succeed.

Author and Article Information
space

From the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Customer Service, American College of Physicians, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
W. Yin, A. Basu, J. X. Zhang, A. Rabbani, D. O. Meltzer, and G. C. Alexander
The Effect of the Medicare Part D Prescription Benefit on Drug Utilization and Expenditures
Ann Intern Med, February 5, 2008; 148(3): 169 - 177.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
W. Shrank, J. Avorn, C. Rolon, and P. Shekelle
Effect of Content and Format of Prescription Drug Labels on Readability, Understanding, and Medication Use: A Systematic Review
Ann. Pharmacother., May 1, 2007; 41(5): 783 - 801.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
The USP Model Guidelines Expert Committee and U.S.
Narrative review: the U.S. Pharmacopeia and model guidelines for Medicare Part D formularies.
Ann Intern Med, September 19, 2006; 145(6): 448 - 453.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
W. H Shrank, S. M Asch, G. J Joseph, H. N Young, S. L Ettner, Y. Kholodenko, P. Glassman, and R. L Kravitz
Physicians' Perceived Knowledge of and Responsibility for Managing Patients' Out-of-Pocket Costs for Prescription Drugs
Ann. Pharmacother., September 1, 2006; 40(9): 1534 - 1540.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W. H. Shrank, T. Hoang, S. L. Ettner, P. A. Glassman, K. Nair, D. DeLapp, J. Dirstine, J. Avorn, and S. M. Asch
The implications of choice: prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence for chronic conditions.
Arch Intern Med, February 13, 2006; 166(3): 332 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. M. DeWitt, H. A. Glick, D. A. Albert, M. M. Joffe, and F. Wolfe
Medicare Coverage of Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} Inhibitors as an Influence on Physicians' Prescribing Behavior
Arch Intern Med, January 9, 2006; 166(1): 57 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
W. F. Gellad, H. A. Huskamp, K. A. Phillips, and J. S. Haas
How The New Medicare Drug Benefit Could Affect Vulnerable Populations
Health Aff., January 1, 2006; 25(1): 248 - 255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. E. Havrda, B. A. Omundsen, W. Bender, and M. A. Kirkpatrick
Impact of the Medicare Modernization Act on Low-Income Persons
Ann Intern Med, October 18, 2005; 143(8): 600 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
G. Nichol, P. Kaul, E. Huszti, and J. F.P. Bridges
Cost-Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Symptomatic Heart Failure
Ann Intern Med, September 7, 2004; 141(5): 343 - 351.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
M. A. Hlatky and B. M. Massie
Cardiac Resynchronization for Heart Failure
Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2004; (2004) 0000605-200409070-00105.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Physicians.