Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Published comments/rapid response letters
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Goldstein, N. E.
space
  arrow  Krumholz, H. M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Management of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in End-of-Life Care

right arrow Nathan E. Goldstein, MD; Rachel Lampert, MD; Elizabeth Bradley, PhD; Joanne Lynn, MD, MA, MS; and Harlan M. Krumholz, MD

7 December 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 11 | Pages 835-838

Background: Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) can prevent premature death from an arrhythmia but may also prolong the dying process and make it more distressing.

Objective: To describe the frequency, timing, and correlates of discussions about deactivating ICDs.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Telephone survey.

Participants: Next of kin of patients with ICDs who died of any cause. Of 136 next of kin contacted, 100 (74%) participated.

Measurements: Incidence of discussions about deactivating ICDs and timing of last shock from ICD.

Results: Next of kin reported that clinicians discussed deactivating the ICD in only 27 of the 100 cases. Most discussions occurred in the last few days of life. Family members reported that 8 patients received a shock from their ICD in the minutes before death.

Limitations: This retrospective survey relied on the reports of next of kin.

Conclusions: Next of kin reported that clinicians discussed deactivating ICDs with few patients. Individuals who choose to receive this device should have the opportunity to choose to discontinue it as death approaches.


Editors' Notes
space

Context

  • Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the likelihood of arrhythmic death, but ICD discharges are uncomfortable. Some terminally ill patients may prefer to deactivate their ICDs when maximizing comfort has taken priority over prolonging life.

Contribution

  • In this survey of the next of kin of 100 patients who died with ICDs in place, only 27 reported that physicians discussed deactivation of the ICD and often did so only in the last few days of life.

Implications

  • Discussing ICD deactivation may improve the care of patients who are nearing death.

–The Editors

 

Author and Article Information
space

From the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; and the Washington Home Center for Palliative Care Studies, Washington, DC.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Barbara Mendes and Joanne McGloin at the Program on Aging, Yale University, for their assistance with data collection. The After-Death Bereaved Family Interview of the Toolkit of Instruments to Measure End-of-Life Care is used with permission of Joan Teno, MD, MS, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island.

Grant Support: Dr. Goldstein was a Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholar funded by the Department of Veterans Affairs during the course of this study. Dr. Lampert is supported by American Heart Association grant #0030190N. Dr. Bradley is supported by the Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation (Donaghue Investigator Award grant #02-102) and the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale University (#P30AG21342). Dr. Lynn is supported by The Washington Home Center for Palliative Care Studies.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest:Expert testimony: J. Lynn (Medicare Coverage Advisory Committee).

Requests for Single Reprints: Nathan E. Goldstein, MD, Department of Geriatrics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Box 1070, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029; e-mail, nathan.goldstein{at}mssm.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Goldstein: Brookdale Department of Geriatrics, Box 1070, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029.

Dr. Lampert: Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208017, New Haven, CT 06510.

Dr. Bradley: Yale School of Public Health, 60 College Street, PO Box 208034, New Haven, CT 06520.

Dr. Lynn: The Washington Home Center for Palliative Care Studies, 3720 Upton Street, NW, Washington, DC 20016.

Dr. Krumholz: Clinical Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, PO Box 208025, New Haven, CT 06520-8025.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: N.E. Goldstein, R. Lampert, J. Lynn, H.M. Krumholz.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: N.E. Goldstein, R. Lampert, E. Bradley, J. Lynn, H.M. Krumholz.

Drafting of the article: N.E. Goldstein.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: N.E. Goldstein, R. Lampert, E. Bradley, J. Lynn, H.M. Krumholz.

Final approval of the article: N.E. Goldstein, R. Lampert, E. Bradley, J. Lynn, H.M. Krumholz.

Provision of study materials or patients: R. Lampert.

Statistical expertise: N.E. Goldstein.

Obtaining of funding: H.M. Krumholz.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: N.E. Goldstein.

Collection and assembly of data: N.E. Goldstein.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators and End-of-Life Care
Annals 2004 141: I-38. [Full Text]  

Letters
Next-of-Kin Responses and Do-Not-Resuscitate Implications for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Laura J. Morrison AND Christian T. Sinclair
Annals 2005 142: 676-677. [Full Text]  

Letters
Next-of-Kin Responses and Do-Not-Resuscitate Implications for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Nathan E. Goldstein, Rachel Lampert, AND Harlan M. Krumholz
Annals 2005 142: 677. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. L. Wilkoff, A. Auricchio, J. Brugada, M. Cowie, K. A. Ellenbogen, A. M. Gillis, D. L. Hayes, J. G. Howlett, J. Kautzner, C. J. Love, et al.
HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of Techniques, Indications, Personnel, Frequency and Ethical Considerations: Developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC), the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association
Europace, June 1, 2008; 10(6): 707 - 725.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): e1 - e62.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al.
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): e350 - e408.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Matlock
Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators, Heart Failure, and Patient Characteristics
JAMA, January 23, 2008; 299(3): 285 - 286.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
P. J. Hauptman
Palliation in heart failure: When less and more are more
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2006; 23(2): 150 - 152.
[PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. M. Beattie, M. J. Connolly, and J. E. Ellershaw
Deactivating Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Ann Intern Med, November 1, 2005; 143(9): 690 - 691.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
S. B. Dunbar
Psychosocial Issues of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2005; 14(4): 294 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. T. Berger
The Ethics of Deactivating Implanted Cardioverter Defibrillators
Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 631 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. J. Morrison and C. T. Sinclair
Next-of-Kin Responses and Do-Not-Resuscitate Implications for Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators
Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 676 - 677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
R. E. Enck
Management of cardiac devices as the end nears
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2005; 22(1): 7 - 8.
[PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

“Management of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators in End-of-Life Care”, a Reply
Katrina A. Bramstedt, et al.
Annals Online, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
ICD Use and Biased Care
Jeffrey T. Berger
Annals Online, 17 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Limitations with Next of Kin responses and DNR implications for ICDs
Laura J. Morrison, et al.
Annals Online, 21 Dec 2004 [Full text]
Implantable Defibrillators Could Improve End-Of-Life Care
David T Martin
Annals Online, 28 Jan 2005 [Full text]
In Response
Nathan E Goldstein, et al.
Annals Online, 1 Feb 2005 [Full text]



 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Physicians.