 |
 |
|
|
|  PubMed
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 July 2004 | Volume 141 Issue 1 | Pages 28-38
Background: Hospitalists are assuming an increasing role in the care of surgical patients, but the impact of this model of care on postoperative outcomes is unknown.
Objective: To determine the impact of providing a collaborative, hospitalist-led model of care on postoperative outcomes and costs among patients having hip or knee arthroplasty.
Design: Randomized, controlled trial.
Setting: Academic medical center.
Participants: 526 patients having elective orthopedic surgery who are at elevated risk for postoperative morbidity.
Measurements: Length of stay, inpatient postoperative medical complications, health care provider satisfaction, and inpatient costs.
Interventions: A comanagement medical Hospitalist–Orthopedic Team compared with standard postoperative care by orthopedic surgeons with medical consultation.
Results: More patients in the hospitalist group were discharged from the hospital with no complications (61.6% vs. 49.8%; difference, 11.8 percentage points [95% CI, 2.8 to 20.7 percentage points]). Fewer minor complications were observed among hospitalist patients (30.2% vs. 44.3%; difference, –14.1 percentage points [CI, –22.7 to –5.3 percentage points]). Observed length of stay was not statistically different between treatment groups. However, when adjusted for discharge delays, mean length of stay for patients in the hospitalist model of care was shorter (5.1 days vs. 5.6 days; difference, –0.5 day [CI, –0.8 to –0.1 day]). Total costs did not differ between groups. Orthopedic surgeons and nurses preferred the hospitalist model.
Limitations: Care providers and patients were aware of intervention assignments, and the study could not capture all costs associated with the hospitalist model.
Conclusions: The comanagement medical Hospitalist–Orthopedic Team model reduced minor postoperative complication rates with no statistically significant difference in length of stay or cost. The nurses and surgeons strongly preferred the comanagement hospitalist model. Additional research on the clinical and economic impact of the hospitalist model in other surgical populations is warranted.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Cautions
–The Editors
Author and Article Information
From Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, and the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Donna Lawson, LPN, and Danica Myhre, BS, for data collection, data entry, and project management; Marlené Boyd for administrative assistance; the Department of Medicine leadership, Kevin Whitford, MD, and other Inpatient Internal Medicine faculty and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery for their strong support, participation, and collaboration; the orthopedic surgical nurses at Rochester Methodist Hospital for their willingness to become crucial members of the Hospitalist–Orthopedic Team model of perioperative care; and Amy J. Markowitz for her editorial review.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Jeanne M. Huddleston, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905; e-mail, huddleston.jeanne{at}mayo.edu.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Huddleston, Long, Trousdale, Cabanela, and Naessens, Mr. Larson, Mr. Plevak, and Mr. Ilstrup: Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Dr. Vanness: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 785 WARF Building, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726.
Dr. Wachter: University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143. IMPROVING PATIENT CARE
Improving Patient Care is a special section within Annals supported in part by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the position or endorsement of AHRQ or HHS.
Medical and Surgical Comanagement after Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
A Randomized, Controlled Trial
CiteULike 
Complore 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Facebook 
Reddit 
Technorati 
Twitter What's this?
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. N. Wijeysundera, P. C. Austin, W. S. Beattie, J. E. Hux, and A. Laupacis A Population-Based Study of Anesthesia Consultation Before Major Noncardiac Surgery Arch Intern Med, March 23, 2009; 169(6): 595 - 602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. C. Peterson A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Quality Measures in Adult Patients Cared for by Hospitalists vs Nonhospitalists Mayo Clin. Proc., March 1, 2009; 84(3): 248 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. H. Pham, J. M. Grossman, G. Cohen, and T. Bodenheimer Hospitalists And Care Transitions: The Divorce Of Inpatient And Outpatient Care Health Aff., September 1, 2008; 27(5): 1315 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Auerbach and N. Sehgal Opportunity Realized? Medical Consultation for Patients Undergoing Major Surgery--Reply Arch Intern Med, July 14, 2008; 168(13): 1471 - 1471. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. V. Williams Hospitalists and the Hospital Medicine System of Care Are Good for Patient Care Arch Intern Med, June 23, 2008; 168(12): 1254 - 1256. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. D. Bushnell, J. K. Horton, M. F. McDonald, and P. G. Robertson Perioperative Medical Comorbidities in the Orthopaedic Patient J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., April 1, 2008; 16(4): 216 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. I. Rappaport and D. M. Pressel Pediatric Hospitalist Comanagement of Surgical Patients: Challenges and Opportunities Clinical Pediatrics, March 1, 2008; 47(2): 114 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. Auerbach, M. A. Rasic, N. Sehgal, B. Ide, B. Stone, and J. Maselli Opportunity Missed: Medical Consultation, Resource Use, and Quality of Care of Patients Undergoing Major Surgery Arch Intern Med, November 26, 2007; 167(21): 2338 - 2344. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. A. Horberg, L. B. Hurley, D. B. Klein, S. E. Follansbee, C. Quesenberry, J. A. Flamm, G. M. Green, and T. Luu Surgical Outcomes in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Arch Surg, December 1, 2006; 141(12): 1238 - 1245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Auerbach and L. Goldman Assessing and Reducing the Cardiac Risk of Noncardiac Surgery Circulation, March 14, 2006; 113(10): 1361 - 1376. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Wiese and R. L. Holman Update in Hospital Medicine Ann Intern Med, February 7, 2006; 144(3): 195 - 200. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Roy, M. G. Heckman, and V. Roy Associations Between the Hospitalist Model of Care and Quality-of-Care-Related Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery Mayo Clin. Proc., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 28 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. Chan, R. Motagi, and R. Thomas Hospital Medicine JAMA, December 21, 2005; 294(23): 3034 - 3034. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. V. Williams Improving Patient Care Can Set Your Brain on Fire Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 305 - 306. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. P. Phy, D. J. Vanness, L. J. Melton III, K. H. Long, C. D. Schleck, D. R. Larson, P. M. Huddleston, and J. M. Huddleston Effects of a Hospitalist Model on Elderly Patients With Hip Fracture Arch Intern Med, April 11, 2005; 165(7): 796 - 801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. J. Merli The Hospitalist Joins the Surgical Team Ann Intern Med, July 6, 2004; 141(1): 67 - 69. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Read all Rapid Responses
