|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 February 2004 | Volume 140 Issue 4 | Pages 278-289
Allergic rhinitis is an increasingly common disease, with a prevalence of at least 10% to 25% in the United States. Diagnostic allergy tests, such as skin tests and in vitro tests, can assist clinicians in determining whether nasal symptoms are allergic in origin. In addition, safe and effective medications are available to treat allergic rhinitis.
The initial strategy should be to determine whether patients should undergo diagnostic testing or receive empirical treatment. This paper reviews the test characteristics of the history, skin tests, and in vitro tests in diagnosing allergic rhinitis from the perspective of decision thresholds. A combination of pertinent medical history features in a practice with a high baseline prevalence of allergic rhinitis justifies the common practice of empirical treatment since allergy medication has minimal toxicity and side effects.
The situation is more complex when the patient needs a diagnostic test, because reported sensitivities and specificities of skin tests and in vitro tests vary widely. As a result, it is difficult to calculate the post-test probability of allergic rhinitis with any confidence. The decision to initiate diagnostic testing must rely on clinical judgment to select patients who would benefit most from determining their allergic status while minimizing unnecessary testing and medications. Diagnosing allergy to a specific antigen allows patients to avoid the allergen and makes them candidates for allergen immunotherapy, which can decrease the need for medications.
Author and Article Information
From the Northwest Asthma and Allergy Center and The Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Gail Shapiro, MD; John Sheffield, MD; and Michael Kennedy, MD, for their thoughtful reviews of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH, The Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Gendo: Northwest Asthma and Allergy Center, 4540 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98105-3941.
Dr. Larson: The Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101-1448. ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
COMMON DIAGNOSTIC TESTS
Series Editors: Alan Garber, MD, PhD, and Harold Sox, MD
Evidence-Based Diagnostic Strategies for Evaluating Suspected Allergic Rhinitis
![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. de Groot, P. L P Brand, W. F Fokkens, and M. Y Berger Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis in children BMJ, November 10, 2007; 335(7627): 985 - 988. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Choo-Kang Becoming a Complete "Asthmologist" Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5): 3093 - 3096. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
ADDITIONAL ARTICLES ABSTRACTED IN ACP JOURNAL CLUB Evid. Based Med., September 1, 2004; 9(5): 131 - 131. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D. Marshall Internal and External Environmental Influences in Allergic Diseases J Am Osteopath Assoc, May 1, 2004; 104(5_suppl): 1S - 6S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||