Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 July 2003 | Volume 139 Issue 2 | Pages 105-112
Background: Residual renal function is an important determinant of mortality and morbidity in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. However, few studies have evaluated therapeutic approaches for preserving residual renal function after the initiation of dialysis.
Objective: To test the hypothesis that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril slows the decline in residual renal function in patients with end-stage renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis.
Design: Randomized, open-label, controlled trial.
Setting: Single-center study in the dialysis unit of a university teaching hospital.
Patients: 60 patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.
Measurements: Patients were randomly assigned to ramipril (5 mg daily) or no treatment. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mm Hg or less. Rate of decline in residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and development of complete anuria were compared among groups.
Results: Over 12 months, average residual GFR declined by 2.07 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in the ramipril group versus 3.00 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in the control group (P = 0.03). The difference between the average changes in residual GFR in the ramipril and control groups from baseline to 12 months was 0.93 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (95% CI, 0.09 to 1.78 mL/min per 1.73 m2). At 12 months, 14 patients in the ramipril group and 22 in the control group developed anuria. With intention-to-treat multivariable analysis using the Cox model, it was estimated that at 3, 6, and 9 months, patients assigned to ramipril had a higher adjusted hazard of complete anuria than did patients assigned to no treatment. Of the 25 patients who still did not have complete anuria at 12 months, those assigned to ramipril had a better prognosis than did those assigned to no treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58 [CI, 0.36 to 0.94]). The rates of death from any cause, duration of hospitalization, and cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between groups.
Conclusions: Although the trial was small and had a limited ability to exclude effects of potential confounding factors, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril may reduce the rate of decline of residual renal function in patients with end-stage renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Cautions
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
The preliminary results of this study were presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, 30 October4 November 2002, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Ms. Wendy Tang for her clerical assistance and the nursing staff of Renal Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, for their help in data collection.
Grant Support: In part by research accounts 6901031 and 6900570 from the Chinese University of Hong Kong and in part by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Limited.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.
Requests for Single Reprints: Philip K.-T. Li, FRCP, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; e-mail, philipli{at}cuhk.edu.hk.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Li, Chow, Wong, Leung, and Szeto: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: P.K.-T. Li.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: K.-M. Chow, C.-B. Leung, C.-C. Szeto.
Drafting of the article: C.-C. Szeto.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: P.K.-T. Li.
Final approval of the article: P.K.-T. Li, T. Y.-H. Wong.
Provision of study materials or patients: P.K.-T. Li.
Statistical expertise: C.-C. Szeto.
Obtaining of funding: P.K.-T. Li.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: P.K.-T. Li.
Collection and assembly of data: K.-M. Chow, T. Y.-H. Wong, C.-B. Leung, C.-C. Szeto. ARTICLE
Effects of an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor on Residual Renal Function in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis
A Randomized, Controlled Study
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. K.-T. Li, B. C.-H. Kwan, C. C. Szeto, and G. T.-C. Ko Metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis patients NDT Plus, August 1, 2008; 1(4): 206 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Sood, R. P. Pauly, C. Rigatto, and P. Komenda Left ventricular dysfunction in the haemodialysis population NDT Plus, August 1, 2008; 1(4): 199 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Kolesnyk, M. Noordzij, F. W. Dekker, E. W. Boeschoten, and R. T. Krediet A positive effect of AII inhibitors on peritoneal membrane function in long-term PD patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 30, 2008; (2008) gfn421v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Fang, D. G. Oreopoulos, and J. M. Bargman Use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 20, 2008; (2008) gfn321v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Canaud Residual renal function: the delicate balance betweenbenefits and risks Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1801 - 1805. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. K.-T. Li and C.-C. Szeto Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1475 - 1478. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Khawar, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, W. K. Lo, D. Johnson, and R. Mehrotra Is the Declining Use of Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Justified by Outcome Data? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1317 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. G. Blake Randomized controlled trials in PD Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2746 - 2748. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Saxena and C. West Peritoneal dialysis: a primary care perspective. J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 380 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Moranne, S. Willoteaux, D. Pagniez, P. Dequiedt, and E. Boulanger Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1040 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. G. Jaar, J. Coresh, L. C. Plantinga, N. E. Fink, M. J. Klag, A. S. Levey, N. W. Levin, J. H. Sadler, A. Kliger, and N. R. Powe Comparing the Risk for Death with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in a National Cohort of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 174 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Bargman and T. A. Golper The importance of residual renal function for patients on dialysis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 671 - 673. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Korosi Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease Ann Intern Med, June 1, 2004; 140(11): 934 - 934. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||