Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients
space
 arrow  Summary for Patients (PDF)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Li, P. K.-T.
space
  arrow  Szeto, C.-C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Effects of an Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor on Residual Renal Function in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis

A Randomized, Controlled Study

right arrow Philip Kam-Tao Li, FRCP; Kai-Ming Chow, MBChB, MRCP(UK); Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong, MBChB, MRCP(UK); Chi-Bon Leung, MBChB, MRCP(UK); and Cheuk-Chun Szeto, MD, MRCP(UK)

15 July 2003 | Volume 139 Issue 2 | Pages 105-112

Background: Residual renal function is an important determinant of mortality and morbidity in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. However, few studies have evaluated therapeutic approaches for preserving residual renal function after the initiation of dialysis.

Objective: To test the hypothesis that the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril slows the decline in residual renal function in patients with end-stage renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis.

Design: Randomized, open-label, controlled trial.

Setting: Single-center study in the dialysis unit of a university teaching hospital.

Patients: 60 patients receiving peritoneal dialysis.

Measurements: Patients were randomly assigned to ramipril (5 mg daily) or no treatment. The target blood pressure was 135/85 mm Hg or less. Rate of decline in residual glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and development of complete anuria were compared among groups.

Results: Over 12 months, average residual GFR declined by 2.07 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in the ramipril group versus 3.00 mL/min per 1.73 m2 in the control group (P = 0.03). The difference between the average changes in residual GFR in the ramipril and control groups from baseline to 12 months was 0.93 mL/min per 1.73 m2 (95% CI, 0.09 to 1.78 mL/min per 1.73 m2). At 12 months, 14 patients in the ramipril group and 22 in the control group developed anuria. With intention-to-treat multivariable analysis using the Cox model, it was estimated that at 3, 6, and 9 months, patients assigned to ramipril had a higher adjusted hazard of complete anuria than did patients assigned to no treatment. Of the 25 patients who still did not have complete anuria at 12 months, those assigned to ramipril had a better prognosis than did those assigned to no treatment (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.58 [CI, 0.36 to 0.94]). The rates of death from any cause, duration of hospitalization, and cardiovascular events did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusions: Although the trial was small and had a limited ability to exclude effects of potential confounding factors, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril may reduce the rate of decline of residual renal function in patients with end-stage renal failure treated with peritoneal dialysis.


Editors' Notes
space

Context

  • Few studies assess preservation of residual renal function after initiation of dialysis.

Contribution

  • This open-label randomized trial in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis showed that ramipril reduced declines in glomerular filtration rate and decreased the hazard rate of anuria at 1 year. Five of 30 patients stopped taking ramipril because of dizziness or cough; none withdrew as a result of hyperkalemia.

Cautions

  • The trial did not use a placebo comparison group, involved patients from a single university teaching hospital, and was not powered to detect differences in health care utilization or morbidity or mortality.

–The Editors

 

Author and Article Information
space

From Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.

The preliminary results of this study were presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, 30 October–4 November 2002, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank Ms. Wendy Tang for her clerical assistance and the nursing staff of Renal Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong, for their help in data collection.

Grant Support: In part by research accounts 6901031 and 6900570 from the Chinese University of Hong Kong and in part by Aventis Pharmaceuticals Limited.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Philip K.-T. Li, FRCP, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong; e-mail, philipli{at}cuhk.edu.hk.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Li, Chow, Wong, Leung, and Szeto: Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Ngan Shing Street, Shatin, Hong Kong, China.

Author Contributions: Conception and design: P.K.-T. Li.

Analysis and interpretation of the data: K.-M. Chow, C.-B. Leung, C.-C. Szeto.

Drafting of the article: C.-C. Szeto.

Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: P.K.-T. Li.

Final approval of the article: P.K.-T. Li, T. Y.-H. Wong.

Provision of study materials or patients: P.K.-T. Li.

Statistical expertise: C.-C. Szeto.

Obtaining of funding: P.K.-T. Li.

Administrative, technical, or logistic support: P.K.-T. Li.

Collection and assembly of data: K.-M. Chow, T. Y.-H. Wong, C.-B. Leung, C.-C. Szeto.


Related articles in Annals:

Summaries for Patients
Preventing Worsening Kidney Function in Patients Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis
Annals 2003 139: I-32. [Full Text]  

Letters
Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease
Anthony Korosi
Annals 2004 140: 934. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
P. K.-T. Li, B. C.-H. Kwan, C. C. Szeto, and G. T.-C. Ko
Metabolic syndrome in peritoneal dialysis patients
NDT Plus, August 1, 2008; 1(4): 206 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NDT PlusHome page
M. M. Sood, R. P. Pauly, C. Rigatto, and P. Komenda
Left ventricular dysfunction in the haemodialysis population
NDT Plus, August 1, 2008; 1(4): 199 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
I. Kolesnyk, M. Noordzij, F. W. Dekker, E. W. Boeschoten, and R. T. Krediet
A positive effect of AII inhibitors on peritoneal membrane function in long-term PD patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 30, 2008; (2008) gfn421v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
W. Fang, D. G. Oreopoulos, and J. M. Bargman
Use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and survival in patients on peritoneal dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 20, 2008; (2008) gfn321v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
B. Canaud
Residual renal function: the delicate balance betweenbenefits and risks
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1801 - 1805.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. K.-T. Li and C.-C. Szeto
Success of the peritoneal dialysis programme in Hong Kong
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1475 - 1478.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
O. Khawar, K. Kalantar-Zadeh, W. K. Lo, D. Johnson, and R. Mehrotra
Is the Declining Use of Long-Term Peritoneal Dialysis Justified by Outcome Data?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 2(6): 1317 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. G. Blake
Randomized controlled trials in PD
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 2746 - 2748.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
R. Saxena and C. West
Peritoneal dialysis: a primary care perspective.
J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2006; 19(4): 380 - 389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
O. Moranne, S. Willoteaux, D. Pagniez, P. Dequiedt, and E. Boulanger
Effect of iodinated contrast agents on residual renal function in PD patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2006; 21(4): 1040 - 1045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
B. G. Jaar, J. Coresh, L. C. Plantinga, N. E. Fink, M. J. Klag, A. S. Levey, N. W. Levin, J. H. Sadler, A. Kliger, and N. R. Powe
Comparing the Risk for Death with Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis in a National Cohort of Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease
Ann Intern Med, August 2, 2005; 143(3): 174 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. M. Bargman and T. A. Golper
The importance of residual renal function for patients on dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2005; 20(4): 671 - 673.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. Korosi
Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease
Ann Intern Med, June 1, 2004; 140(11): 934 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Physicians.