Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Salerno, S. M.
space
  arrow  Waxman, H. S.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

POSITION PAPER

Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence

right arrow Stephen M. Salerno, MD, MPH; Patrick C. Alguire, MD; and Herbert S. Waxman, MD

6 May 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 9 | Pages 751-760

Background: There have been many proposals for objective standards designed to optimize training, testing, and maintaining competency in interpretation of electrocardiograms (ECGs). However, most of these recommendations are consensus based and are not derived from clinical trials that include patient outcomes.

Purpose: To critically review the available data on training, accuracy, and outcomes of computer and physician interpretation of 12-lead resting ECGs.

Data Sources: English-language articles were retrieved by searching MEDLINE (1966 to 2002), EMBASE (1974 to 2002), and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1975–2002). The references in articles selected for analysis were also reviewed for relevance.

Study Selection: All articles on training, accuracy, and outcomes of ECG interpretations were analyzed.

Data Extraction: Study design and results were summarized in evidence tables. Information on physician interpretation compared to a "gold standard," typically a consensus panel of expert electrocardiographers, was extracted. The clinical context of and outcomes related to the ECG interpretation were obtained whenever possible.

Data Synthesis: Physicians of all specialties and levels of training, as well as computer software for interpreting ECGs, frequently made errors in interpreting ECGs when compared to expert electrocardiographers. There was also substantial disagreement on interpretations among cardiologists. Adverse patient outcomes occurred infrequently when ECGs were incorrectly interpreted.

Conclusions: There is no evidence-based minimum number of ECG interpretations that is ideal for attaining or maintaining competency in ECG interpretation skills. Further research is needed to clarify the optimal way to build and maintain ECG interpretation skills based on patient outcomes.

{dagger}Deceased.

Author and Article Information
space

From Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, and the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Drs. Alguire and Salerno dedicate this article to Herbert Waxman, MD, a friend and colleague whose vision, leadership, and friendship will be missed. Dr. Waxman, who served as Senior Vice President for Medical Knowledge and Education at the American College of Physicians, died on 15 February 2003.

Disclaimer: The opinions or assertions presented are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting those of the Department of the Army or Department of Defense.

Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest: None disclosed.

Requests for Single Reprints: Customer Service, American College of Physicians, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106; e-mail, custserv{at}acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Salerno: Department of Medicine (MCHK-DM), Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Road, Honolulu, HI 96859.

Dr. Alguire: Medical Knowledge and Education Division, American College of Physicians, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106.


Related articles in Annals:

Position Papers
Training and Competency Evaluation for Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians
Stephen M. Salerno, Patrick C. Alguire, AND Herbert S. Waxman
Annals 2003 138: 747-750. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychiatr. Bull.Home page
N. Collins, U. Mandal, G. Pendlebury, and J. Drife
Junior psychiatrists' electrocardiogram interpretation skills
Psychiatr. Bull., September 1, 2008; 32(9): 353 - 355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
C. J. McCann, B. M. Glover, I. B.A. Menown, M. J. Moore, J. McEneny, C. G. Owens, B. Smith, P. C. Sharpe, I. S. Young, and J. A. Adgey
Novel biomarkers in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction compared with cardiac troponin T
Eur. Heart J., August 5, 2008; (2008) ehn363v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
H. C P M van Weert
Diagnosing atrial fibrillation in general practice
BMJ, August 25, 2007; 335(7616): 355 - 356.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Mant, D. A Fitzmaurice, F D R. Hobbs, S. Jowett, E. T Murray, R. Holder, M. Davies, and G. Y H Lip
Accuracy of diagnosing atrial fibrillation on electrocardiogram by primary care practitioners and interpretative diagnostic software: analysis of data from screening for atrial fibrillation in the elderly (SAFE) trial
BMJ, August 25, 2007; 335(7616): 380 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al.
Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 13, 2007; 49(10): 1109 - 1127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Kligfield, L. S. Gettes, J. J. Bailey, R. Childers, B. J. Deal, E. W. Hancock, G. van Herpen, J. A. Kors, P. Macfarlane, D. M. Mirvis, et al.
Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: Part I: The Electrocardiogram and Its Technology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology
Circulation, March 13, 2007; 115(10): 1306 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
L. H. Lund
Computerized Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram
Arch Intern Med, August 9, 2004; 164(15): 1698 - 1698.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. M. Salerno, P. C. Alguire, and H. S. Waxman
Training and Competency Evaluation for Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians
Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 747 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2003 by the American College of Physicians.