Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6 May 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 9 | Pages 705-713
Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients often receive fluconazole or an amphotericin B preparation for antifungal prophylaxis. Because of concerns about fungal resistance with fluconazole and toxicity with amphotericin B, alternative prophylactic regimens have become necessary.
Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral itraconazole with the efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral fluconazole for long-term prophylaxis of fungal infections.
Design: Open-label, multicenter, randomized trial.
Setting: Five transplantation centers in the United States.
Patients: 140 patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation.
Intervention: Itraconazole (200 mg intravenously every 12 hours for 2 days followed by 200 mg intravenously every 24 hours or a 200-mg oral solution every 12 hours) or fluconazole (400 mg intravenously or orally every 24 hours) from day 1 until day 100 after transplantation.
Measurements: Proven invasive or superficial fungal infection, drug-related side effects, mortality from fungal infection, and overall mortality.
Results: Proven invasive fungal infections occurred in 6 of 71 itraconazole recipients (9%) and in 17 of 67 fluconazole recipients (25%) during the first 180 days after transplantation (difference, 16 percentage points [95% CI, 29.2 to 4.7 percentage points]; P = 0.01). Superficial fungal infections occurred in 3 of 71 itraconazole recipients (4%) and in 2 of 67 fluconazole recipients (3%). In a multivariable analysis using factors known to affect the risk for invasive fungal infection after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, prophylaxis with itraconazole was still associated with fewer invasive fungal infections (odds ratio, 0.300 [CI, 0.111 to 0.814]; P = 0.02) caused by either yeasts or molds. More fungal pathogens were found to be resistant to fluconazole than to itraconazole. Except for more frequent gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pain) in patients given itraconazole (24% vs. 9%; difference, 15 percentage points [CI, 2.9 to 27.0 percentage points]; P = 0.02), both itraconazole and fluconazole were well tolerated. The overall mortality rate was similar in each group (32 of 71 patients in the itraconazole group [45%] vs. 28 of 67 patients in the fluconazole group [42%]; difference, 3 percentage points [CI, 13.2 to 19.8 percentage points]; P > 0.2), but fewer deaths were related to fungal infection in patients given itraconazole (6 of 71 [9%]) than in patients given fluconazole (12 of 67 [18%]) (difference, 9 percentage points [CI, 20.6 to 1.8 percentage points]; P = 0.13).
Conclusion: Itraconazole is more effective than fluconazole for long-term prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Except for gastrointestinal side effects, itraconazole is well tolerated.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Oregon Health and Sciences University, Portland, Oregon; Harper University Hospital, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; Ireland Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio; Indiana University Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana; and Ortho Biotech, Raritan, New Jersey.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ann Gogesch, RN, UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, and Mary Steigelman, RN, Harper University Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, for their valuable assistance during the study. They also thank Dr. Ronghua Yang, Larry Broach, and Katie Harding for performing data and statistical analyses and Katharine Fry for preparing the manuscript.
Grant Support: By Janssen Research Foundation, Titusville, New Jersey.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest:Employment: G.J. Leitz (Ortho Biotech); Consultancies: J.L. Blumer (Pfizer); Honoraria: D.J. Winston (Ortho Biotech and Pfizer), P.H. Chandrasekar (Pfizer), J.L. Blumer (Pfizer); Grants received: D.J. Winston (Janssen Research Foundation, Ortho Biotech, and Pfizer), P.H. Chandrasekar (Pfizer), M. Goldman (Janssen Research Foundation).
Requests for Single Reprints: Drew J. Winston, MD, Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Room 42-121 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095; e-mail, dwinston{at}mednet.ucla.edu.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Winston: Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Room 42-121 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Dr. Maziarz: Oregon Health and Sciences University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97232.
Dr. Chandrasekar: Harper University Hospital, 4 Brush Center, 3990 John R, Detroit, MI 48201.
Dr. Lazarus: Ireland Cancer Center, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Dr. Goldman: Wishard Memorial Hospital, 430 OPW, 1001 West Tenth Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Dr. Blumer: Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Dr. Leitz: Ortho Biotech, 430 Route 22 East, Bridgewater, NJ 08807.
Dr. Territo: Department of Medicine, UCLA Medical Center, Room 42-121 CHS, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: D.J. Winston.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: D.J. Winston, G.J. Leitz.
Drafting of the article: D.J. Winston.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: D.J. Winston, R.T. Maziarz, P.H. Chandrasekar, H.M. Lazarus, M. Goldman, J.L. Blumer.
Final approval of the article: D.J. Winston, R.T. Maziarz, P.H. Chandrasekar, M.C. Territo.
Provision of study materials or patients: R.T. Maziarz, P.H. Chandrasekar, H.M. Lazarus, M. Goldman, J.L. Blumer, M.C. Territo.
Obtaining of funding: D.J. Winston.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: G.J. Leitz.
Collection and assembly of the data: D.J. Winston. ARTICLE
Intravenous and Oral Itraconazole versus Intravenous and Oral Fluconazole for Long-Term Antifungal Prophylaxis in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Recipients: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. C. Doyle Aspergillosis Prophylaxis and Treatment for Pediatric HSCT Patients: Environmental and Pharmacologic Options Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing, September 1, 2008; 25(5): 240 - 246. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Robenshtok, A. Gafter-Gvili, E. Goldberg, M. Weinberger, M. Yeshurun, L. Leibovici, and M. Paul Antifungal Prophylaxis in Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy or Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2007; 25(34): 5471 - 5489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Oshima, Y. Kanda, Y. Asano-Mori, N. Nishimoto, S. Arai, S. Nagai, H. Sato, T. Watanabe, N. Hosoya, K. Izutsu, et al. Presumptive treatment strategy for aspergillosis in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2007; 60(2): 350 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Ullmann, J. H. Lipton, D. H. Vesole, P. Chandrasekar, A. Langston, S. R. Tarantolo, H. Greinix, W. Morais de Azevedo, V. Reddy, N. Boparai, et al. Posaconazole or Fluconazole for Prophylaxis in Severe Graft-versus-Host Disease N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2007; 356(4): 335 - 347. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. A. Cornely, J. Maertens, D. J. Winston, J. Perfect, A. J. Ullmann, T. J. Walsh, D. Helfgott, J. Holowiecki, D. Stockelberg, Y.-T. Goh, et al. Posaconazole vs. Fluconazole or Itraconazole Prophylaxis in Patients with Neutropenia N. Engl. J. Med., January 25, 2007; 356(4): 348 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Penack, S. Schwartz, P. Martus, M. Reinwald, M. Schmidt-Hieber, E. Thiel, and I. W. Blau Low-dose liposomal amphotericin B in the prevention of invasive fungal infections in patients with prolonged neutropenia: results from a randomized, single-center trial Ann. Onc., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 1306 - 1312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Hoeben, D. S. Burgess, J. T. McConville, L. K. Najvar, R. L. Talbert, J. I. Peters, N. P. Wiederhold, B. L. Frei, J. R. Graybill, R. Bocanegra, et al. In vivo efficacy of aerosolized nanostructured itraconazole formulations for prevention of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., April 1, 2006; 50(4): 1552 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Charlier, E. Hart, A. Lefort, P. Ribaud, F. Dromer, D. W. Denning, and O. Lortholary Fluconazole for the management of invasive candidiasis: where do we stand after 15 years? J. Antimicrob. Chemother., March 1, 2006; 57(3): 384 - 410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Glasmacher, O. Cornely, A. J. Ullmann, U. Wedding, H. Bodenstein, H. Wandt, C. Boewer, R. Pasold, H.-H. Wolf, M. Hanel, et al. An open-label randomized trial comparing itraconazole oral solution with fluconazole oral solution for primary prophylaxis of fungal infections in patients with haematological malignancy and profound neutropenia J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2006; 57(2): 317 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Glasmacher and A. Prentice The role of meta-analysis in the evaluation of antifungal prophylaxis: authors' response J. Antimicrob. Chemother., January 1, 2006; 57(1): 152 - 154. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J. Bow Of Yeasts and Hyphae: A Hematologist's Approach to Antifungal Therapy Hematology, January 1, 2006; 2006(1): 361 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Pfaller, L. Boyken, R. J. Hollis, S. A. Messer, S. Tendolkar, and D. J. Diekema In Vitro Susceptibilities of Clinical Isolates of Candida Species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Aspergillus Species to Itraconazole: Global Survey of 9,359 Isolates Tested by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Broth Microdilution Methods J. Clin. Microbiol., August 1, 2005; 43(8): 3807 - 3810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. H. Kruger, J. Bohlius, O. A. Cornely, H. Einsele, H. Hebart, G. Massenkeil, S. Schuttrumpf, G. Silling, A. J. Ullmann, D. T. Waldschmidt, et al. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Working Party (AGIHO) of the German Society of Haematology and Oncology Ann. Onc., August 1, 2005; 16(8): 1381 - 1390. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Golan Overview of transplant mycology Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2005; 62(suppl_1): S17 - S21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Singh and D. L. Paterson Aspergillus Infections in Transplant Recipients Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2005; 18(1): 44 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Winston, C. Emmanouilides, K. Bartoni, G. J. Schiller, R. Paquette, M. C. Territo, K. A. Marr, and M. Boeckh Elimination of Aspergillus infection in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients with long-term itraconazole prophylaxis: prevention is better than treatment Blood, September 1, 2004; 104(5): 1581 - 1582. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Powers and K. M. Higgins Itraconazole versus Fluconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 580 - 580. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Karthaus, O. A. Cornely, and A. J. Ullmann Itraconazole versus Fluconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 579 - 580. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Mossad Itraconazole versus Fluconazole for Antifungal Prophylaxis Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 580 - 581. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Marr, F. Crippa, W. Leisenring, M. Hoyle, M. Boeckh, S. A. Balajee, W. G. Nichols, B. Musher, and L. Corey Itraconazole versus fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplants Blood, February 15, 2004; 103(4): 1527 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. de Pauw Preventative use of antifungal drugs in patients treated for cancer J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2004; 53(2): 130 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Wingard, W. G. Nichols, and G. B. McDonald Supportive Care Hematology, January 1, 2004; 2004(1): 372 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Glasmacher, A. Prentice, M. Gorschluter, S. Engelhart, C. Hahn, B. Djulbegovic, and I. G.H. Schmidt-Wolf Itraconazole Prevents Invasive Fungal Infections in Neutropenic Patients Treated for Hematologic Malignancies: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis of 3,597 Patients J. Clin. Oncol., December 15, 2003; 21(24): 4615 - 4626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Nichols Management of Infectious Complications in the Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipient J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 2003; 18(6): 295 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Doffman Prophylactic itraconazole may decrease the rate of invasive fungal infection in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients Thorax, August 1, 2003; 58(8): 669 - 669. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Which Azole to Stem Fungal Infections in Stem-Cell Recipients? Journal Watch Infectious Diseases, June 20, 2003; 2003(620): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. N. O'Brien, N. M.A. Blijlevens, T. H. Mahfouz, and E. J. Anaissie Infections in Patients with Hematological Cancer: Recent Developments Hematology, January 1, 2003; 2003(1): 438 - 472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||