|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 February 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 4 | Pages 307-314
Background: Helical computed tomography (CT) is a readily available tool for diagnosing pulmonary embolism (PE); however, its role in the management of patients with clinically suspected PE has not been fully established.
Objective: To determine the effectiveness and safety of using helical CT of the pulmonary arteries as the primary diagnostic test in patients with suspected PE.
Design: Multicenter, prospective clinical outcome study.
Setting: Two academic hospitals and one large teaching hospital in the Netherlands.
Patients: 510 consecutive inpatients and outpatients with clinically suspected PE followed for 3 months.
Interventions: Patients underwent helical CT of the pulmonary arteries within 24 hours after presenting with signs and symptoms of PE. If CT results were normal or inconclusive, compression ultrasonography was performed on the same day as CT and repeated on days 4 and 7 if findings on the first compression ultrasonography were normal. When CT or compression ultrasonography results were positive for thromboembolism, anticoagulation was started. Anticoagulation was not started when results of CT were negative for PE or indicated an alternative diagnosis that explained the clinical signs and symptoms, or when results on serial compression ultrasonography were normal.
Measurements: Patients received instructions to report any symptoms or signs of PE or deep venous thrombosis (DVT) during the 3-month follow-up period. The authors performed compression ultrasonography or phlebography for suspected DVT and pulmonary angiography for suspected PE.
Results: Computed tomography identified PE in 124 of 510 patients (24.3%) and an alternative diagnosis in 130 patients (25.5%); CT scans were normal in 248 patients (48.6%). The CT scan could not be interpreted in 8 patients (1.6%) and was not obtained in 2. Compression ultrasonography revealed DVT in 2 patients at the first examination; findings on repeated compression ultrasonography at days 4 and 7 were normal. Mortality in the patients with normal helical CT scans was 4.1% (10 of 246 patients). No patients in this group died of fatal PE, 1 patient developed nonfatal PE, and venous thromboembolism occurred in 0.4% of these patients (95% CI, 0% to 2.2%). In the patients with alternative diagnoses, 1 patient had DVT on objective testing during follow-up. Mortality in this group was 21.5% (28 of 130 patients); in 1 of these patients, PE could not be confidently ruled out as a contributing cause of death. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 1.5% of these patients (CI, 0.2% to 5.6%).
Conclusions: In patients with suspected PE, helical CT can be used safely as the primary diagnostic test to rule out PE. Serial compression ultrasonography has limited additional value.
*For a list of the Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) Study Group, see the Appendix.
Editors' Notes
Context
Contribution
Implications
The Editors
Author and Article Information
From Leyenburg Ziekenhuis, The Hague; Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden; Utrecht Medical Center, Utrecht; and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Acknowledgments: The results of this study are part of the results of the ANTELOPE Study Group (Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism), a Dutch prospective multicenter trial on pulmonary embolism. The authors thank Annette van den Berg-Huijsmans, Gerda Labadie, and Ria Koolma for their help with the statistical analysis of the results and management of the data.
Grant Support: By grant D94-090 from the Dutch National Health Insurance Council (Ziekenfondsraad).
Requests for Single Reprints: Menno V. Huisman, MD, Department of General Internal Medicine, Room B3Q-84, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail, m.v.huisman{at}lumc.nl.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. van Strijen and Kieft: Department of Radiology, Leyenburg Ziekenhuis, Leyweg 275, 2545 CH The Hague, the Netherlands.
Dr. Monye': Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Cen-ter, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dr. Schiereck: Department of Radiology, Utrecht Medical Center, Utre-cht, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dr. Prins: Department of Epidemiology, Academic Hospital Maastricht, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Dr. Huisman: Department of General Internal Medicine, Room B3Q-84, Leiden University Medical Center, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
Dr. Pattynama: Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rot-terdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: M.J.L. van Strijen, G.J. Kieft, M.H. Prins, M.V. Huisman, P.M.T. Pattynama.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: M.J.L. van Strijen, M.H. Prins, M.V. Huisman.
Drafting of the article: M.J.L. van Strijen, M.V. Huisman, P.M.T. Pat-tynama. Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: M.J.L. van Strijen, W. de Monye', G.J. Kieft, M.H. Prins, M.V. Huisman, P.M.T. Pattynama.
Final approval of the article: M.J.L. van Strijen, W. de Monye', J. Schiereck, G.J. Kieft, M.H. Prins, M.V. Huisman, P.M.T. Pattynama.
Provision of study materials or patients: M.J.L. van Strijen, W. de Monye', J. Schiereck, M.H. Prins, M.V. Huisman.
Statistical expertise: M.H. Prins.
Obtaining of funding: G.J. Kieft, M.H. Prins, P.M.T. Pattynama.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: P.M.T. Pattynama. Collection and assembly of data: M.J.L. van Strijen, W. de Monye', J. Schiereck. ARTICLE
Single-Detector Helical Computed Tomography as the Primary Diagnostic Test in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Multicenter Clinical Management Study of 510 Patients
![]()
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. R. Goodman, H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, and P. K. Woodard CT Venography: A Necessary Adjunct to CT Pulmonary Angiography or a Waste of Time, Money, and Radiation? Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 327 - 330. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Sostman, P. D. Stein, A. Gottschalk, F. Matta, R. Hull, and L. Goodman Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Sensitivity and Specificity of Ventilation-Perfusion Scintigraphy in PIOPED II Study Radiology, March 1, 2008; 246(3): 941 - 946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Anderson, S. R. Kahn, M. A. Rodger, M. J. Kovacs, T. Morris, A. Hirsch, E. Lang, I. Stiell, G. Kovacs, J. Dreyer, et al. Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography vs Ventilation-Perfusion Lung Scanning in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, December 19, 2007; 298(23): 2743 - 2753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Gottschalk, P. D. Stein, H. D. Sostman, F. Matta, and A. Beemath Very Low Probability Interpretation of V/Q Lung Scans in Combination with Low Probability Objective Clinical Assessment Reliably Excludes Pulmonary Embolism: Data from PIOPED II J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2007; 48(9): 1411 - 1415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Nijkeuter, M. Sohne, L. W. Tick, P. W. Kamphuisen, M. H. H. Kramer, L. Laterveer, A. A. van Houten, M. J. H. A. Kruip, F. W. G. Leebeek, H. R. Buller, et al. The Natural Course of Hemodynamically Stable Pulmonary Embolism: Clinical Outcome and Risk Factors in a Large Prospective Cohort Study Chest, February 1, 2007; 131(2): 517 - 523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Hogg, G Brown, J Dunning, J Wright, S Carley, B Foex, and K Mackway-Jones Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with CT pulmonary angiography: a systematic review Emerg. Med. J., March 1, 2006; 23(3): 172 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Writing Group for the Christopher Study Investigat Effectiveness of Managing Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Using an Algorithm Combining Clinical Probability, D-Dimer Testing, and Computed Tomography JAMA, January 11, 2006; 295(2): 172 - 179. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Hull Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism With Improved Certainty and Simplicity JAMA, January 11, 2006; 295(2): 213 - 215. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Meral, A. Mirici, S. Aslan, M. Akgun, H. Kaynar, L. Saglam, and M. Gorguner Barometric Pressure and the Incidence of Pulmonary Embolism Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2190 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-M. Roy, I. Colombet, P. Durieux, G. Chatellier, H. Sors, and G. Meyer Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism BMJ, July 30, 2005; 331(7511): 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Daftary, M. Gregory, A. Daftary, J. P. Seibyl, and S. Saluja Chest Radiograph as a Triage Tool in the Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 132 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Patel and E. A. Kazerooni Helical CT for the Evaluation of Acute Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2005; 185(1): 135 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. W. van der Meer, P. M. T. Pattynama, M. J. L. van Strijen, A. A. van den Berg-Huijsmans, I. J. C. Hartmann, H. Putter, A. de Roos, and M. V. Huisman Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Pulmonary Obstruction Index at Helical CT: Prediction of Clinical Outcome during 3-month Follow-up in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism Radiology, June 1, 2005; 235(3): 798 - 803. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Girard Defining the Role of Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Ann Intern Med, May 3, 2005; 142(9): 801 - 801. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Leacche, D. Unic, S. Z. Goldhaber, J. D. Rawn, S. F. Aranki, G. S. Couper, T. Mihaljevic, R. J. Rizzo, L. H. Cohn, L. Aklog, et al. Modern surgical treatment of massive pulmonary embolism: Results in 47 consecutive patients after rapid diagnosis and aggressive surgical approach J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1018 - 1023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. G. Ravenel, P. Costello, U. J. Schoepf, J. Eng, and J. B. Segal CT in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism Am. J. Roentgenol., May 1, 2005; 184(5): 1707 - 1708. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Goldhaber Multislice Computed Tomography for Pulmonary Embolism -- A Technological Marvel N. Engl. J. Med., April 28, 2005; 352(17): 1812 - 1814. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Quiroz, N. Kucher, K. H. Zou, F. Kipfmueller, P. Costello, S. Z. Goldhaber, and U. J. Schoepf Clinical Validity of a Negative Computed Tomography Scan in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review JAMA, April 27, 2005; 293(16): 2012 - 2017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Moores, W. L. Jackson Jr., A. F. Shorr, and J. L. Jackson Meta-Analysis: Outcomes in Patients with Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Managed with Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography Ann Intern Med, December 7, 2004; 141(11): 866 - 874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Reinartz, J. E. Wildberger, W. Schaefer, B. Nowak, A. H. Mahnken, and U. Buell Tomographic Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism: A Comparison Between V/Q Lung Scintigraphy in SPECT Technique and Multislice Spiral CT J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 1501 - 1508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kroenke and L. Logio Update in General Internal Medicine Ann Intern Med, August 3, 2004; 141(3): 213 - 220. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Davison, R. Bridwell, J. L. Montilla, E. Jackson, and L. K. Moores A Novel Diagnostic Method for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Technetium-99m Apcitide Scintigraphy Ann Intern Med, June 1, 2004; 140(11): 936 - 939. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M Riedel Diagnosing pulmonary embolism Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2004; 80(944): 309 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. J. Schoepf, S. Z. Goldhaber, and P. Costello Spiral Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, May 11, 2004; 109(18): 2160 - 2167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Rathbun, T. L. Whitsett, S. K. Vesely, and G. E. Raskob Clinical Utility of D-dimer in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Nondiagnostic Lung Scans or Negative CT Findings Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Perrier and H. Bounameaux Helical Computed Tomography as a Test for Pulmonary Embolism Ann Intern Med, December 2, 2003; 139(11): 955 - 956. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Z. Goldhaber and C. G. Elliott Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Part I: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Diagnosis Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2726 - 2729. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. F. Fedullo and V. F. Tapson The Evaluation of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism N. Engl. J. Med., September 25, 2003; 349(13): 1247 - 1256. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Donato, J. J. Scheirer, M. S. Atwell, J. Gramp, and R. Duszak Jr Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism and Negative Helical Computed Tomographic Results in Whom Anticoagulation Was Withheld Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2003; 163(17): 2033 - 2038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Katsura, F. Yoshida, and Y. Takinishi Correction: Single-Detector Helical Computed Tomography To Diagnose Pulmonary Embolism Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2003; 139(5_Part_1): 387 - 387. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Kearon Excluding pulmonary embolism with helical (spiral) computed tomography: Evidence is catching up with enthusiasm Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 27, 2003; 168(11): 1430 - 1431. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Sathyapala Helical computed tomography (CT) is safe as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) Thorax, May 1, 2003; 58(5): 443 - 443. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Suspected PE: Withholding Anticoagulation If Helical CT Is Negative Journal Watch Cardiology, April 18, 2003; 2003(418): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
CT Angiography Is a Safe Primary Test for Pulmonary Embolism Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, March 26, 2003; 2003(326): 3 - 3. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Suspected PE: Withholding Anticoagulation If Helical CT Is Negative Journal Watch (General), March 7, 2003; 2003(307): 4 - 4. [Full Text] |
||||