 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
Audio/Video |
CME |
Collections |
In the Clinic |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 June 2003 | Volume 138 Issue 11 | Pages 898-906
Background: Few treatments for back pain are supported by strong scientific evidence. Conventional treatments, although widely used, have had limited success. Dissatisfied patients have, therefore, turned to complementary and alternative medical therapies and providers for care for back pain.
Purpose: To provide a rigorous and balanced summary of the best available evidence about the effectiveness, safety, and costs of the most popular complementary and alternative medical therapies used to treat back pain.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register.
Study Selection: Systematic reviews of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that were published since 1995 and that evaluated acupuncture, massage therapy, or spinal manipulation for nonspecific back pain and RCTs published since the reviews were conducted.
Data Extraction: Two authors independently extracted data from the reviews (including number of RCTs, type of back pain, quality assessment, and conclusions) and original articles (including type of pain, comparison treatments, sample size, outcomes, follow-up intervals, loss to follow-up, and authors' conclusions).
Data Synthesis: Because the quality of the 20 RCTs that evaluated acupuncture was generally poor, the effectiveness of acupuncture for treating acute or chronic back pain is unclear. The three RCTs that evaluated massage reported that this therapy is effective for subacute and chronic back pain. A meta-regression analysis of the results of 26 RCTs evaluating spinal manipulation for acute and chronic back pain reported that spinal manipulation was superior to sham therapies and therapies judged to have no evidence of a benefit but was not superior to effective conventional treatments.
Conclusions: Initial studies have found massage to be effective for persistent back pain. Spinal manipulation has small clinical benefits that are equivalent to those of other commonly used therapies. The effectiveness of acupuncture remains unclear. All of these treatments seem to be relatively safe. Preliminary evidence suggests that massage, but not acupuncture or spinal manipulation, may reduce the costs of care after an initial course of therapy.
Author and Article Information
From Group Health Cooperative and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California; and RAND, Santa Monica, California.
Grant Support: By grant RO1 HS 09989 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health, and by grants AT00622 and AT00606 from the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health.
Potential Financial Conflicts of Interest:Employment: K.J. Sherman (former Research Director of the Northwest Institute of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine); Grants pending: D.C. Cherkin (National Institutes of Health), K.J. Sherman (National Institutes of Health).
Requests for Single Reprints: Daniel C. Cherkin, PhD, Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Cherkin and Sherman: Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1600, Seattle, WA 98101.
Dr. Deyo: Departments of Medicine and Health Services, University of Washington, 146 North Canal Street, Suite 300, Seattle, WA 98103-8652.
Dr. Shekelle: RAND, 1700 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407. ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE SERIES
Series Editors: David M. Eisenberg, MD, and Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD
A Review of the Evidence for the Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost of Acupuncture, Massage Therapy, and Spinal Manipulation for Back Pain
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Chou and L. H. Huffman Nonpharmacologic Therapies for Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Review of the Evidence for an American Pain Society/American College of Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2007; 147(7): 492 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. R. Cassileth, G. E. Deng, J. E. Gomez, P. A. S. Johnstone, N. Kumar, and A. J. Vickers Complementary Therapies and Integrative Oncology in Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition) Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 340S - 354S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Manheimer, K. Linde, L. Lao, L. M. Bouter, and B. M. Berman Meta-analysis: Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis of the Knee Ann Intern Med, June 19, 2007; 146(12): 868 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. H. Shen, D. Samartzis, and G. B.J. Andersson Nonsurgical Management of Acute and Chronic Low Back Pain J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., August 1, 2006; 14(8): 477 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Poitras, R. Blais, B. Swaine, and M. Rossignol Management of Work-Related Low Back Pain: A Population-Based Survey of Physical Therapists Physical Therapy, November 1, 2005; 85(11): 1168 - 1181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Ethgen, I. Boutron, G. Baron, B. Giraudeau, J. Sibilia, and P. Ravaud Reporting of Harm in Randomized, Controlled Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment for Rheumatic Disease Ann Intern Med, July 5, 2005; 143(1): 20 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Carragee Persistent Low Back Pain N. Engl. J. Med., May 5, 2005; 352(18): 1891 - 1898. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Manheimer, A. White, B. Berman, K. Forys, and E. Ernst Meta-Analysis: Acupuncture for Low Back Pain Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 651 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. J. Sherman, D. C. Cherkin, D. M. Eisenberg, J. Erro, A. Hrbek, and R. A. Deyo The Practice of Acupuncture: Who Are the Providers and What Do They Do? Ann. Fam. Med, March 1, 2005; 3(2): 151 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Bondurant and H. C. Sox Mainstream and Alternative Medicine: Converging Paths Require Common Standards Ann Intern Med, January 18, 2005; 142(2): 149 - 150. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. Samuels Update in Neurology Ann Intern Med, January 4, 2005; 142(1): 28 - 36. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Hirakawa, Y. Masuda, T. Kimata, K. Uemura, M. Kuzuya, and A. Iguchi Effects of home massage rehabilitation therapy for the bed-ridden elderly: a pilot trial with a three-month follow-up Clinical Rehabilitation, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 20 - 27. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. D. Childs, J. M. Fritz, T. W. Flynn, J. J. Irrgang, K. K. Johnson, G. R. Majkowski, and A. Delitto A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 920 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. A. Deyo Treatments for Back Pain: Can We Get Past Trivial Effects? Ann Intern Med, December 21, 2004; 141(12): 957 - 958. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Ness and N. Nisly Cracking the Problem of Back Pain: Is Chiropractic the Answer? Arch Intern Med, October 11, 2004; 164(18): 1953 - 1954. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Other articles noted Evid. Based Med., January 1, 2004; 9(1): 31 - 32. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (25 Apr 2003 to 18 Jul 2003) Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2003; 6(4): e1 - 12. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 How Effective Are Alternative Therapies for Back Pain? Journal Watch Neurology, September 5, 2003; 2003(905): 9 - 9. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Massage, Acupuncture, or Manipulation for Low Back Pain? Journal Watch (General), June 20, 2003; 2003(620): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
Article
