Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article    PDF of this article (PDFs free after 6 months)    Figures/Tables List    Related articles in Annals  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Adams, K. E.    Jonsen, A. R.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE SERIES

Series Editors: David M. Eisenberg, MD, and Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD

Ethical Considerations of Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies in Conventional Medical Settings

Karen E. Adams, MD; Michael H. Cohen, JD, MBA, MFA; David Eisenberg, MD; and Albert R. Jonsen, PhD

15 October 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 8 | Pages 660-664

Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk–benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.

Author and Article Information

From Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank the two patients who allowed us to share their stories, Debbie Mosley for invaluable technical assistance, and Martin Donohoe for critical comments.

Grant Support: By unrestricted educational grants from the American Specialty Health Plans, San Diego, California; the Medtronic Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota; and the Friends of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Requests for Single Reprints: Karen E. Adams, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UHNSO, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239; e-mail, adamsk{at}ohsu.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Adams: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology UHNSO, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239.

Mr. Cohen and Dr. Eisenberg: Center for Alternative Medicine Research and Education, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA, 02215

Dr. Jonsen: University of Washington (Emeritus), 1333 Jones Street, San Francisco, CA 94109.

Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Ethics and Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Edzard Ernst

Annals 2003 138: 940. [Full Text]  

Letters
Ethics and Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Karen E. Adams

Annals 2003 138: 940. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Tilburt and F. G. Miller Responding to Medical Pluralism in Practice: A Principled Ethical Approach J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2007; 20(5): 489 - 494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Kennedy, C.-C. Wang, and C.-H. Wu Patient Disclosure about Herb and Supplement Use among Adults in the US Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., May 17, 2007; (2007) nem045v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Cohen, K. J. Kemper, L. Stevens, D. Hashimoto, and J. Gilmour Pediatric Use of Complementary Therapies: Ethical and Policy Choices Pediatrics, October 1, 2005; 116(4): e568 - e575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-D. Lee, H.-J. Park, Y. Chae, and S. Lim An Overview of Bee Venom Acupuncture in the Treatment of Arthritis Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med., March 1, 2005; 2(1): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Cohen and K. J. Kemper Complementary Therapies in Pediatrics: A Legal Perspective Pediatrics, March 1, 2005; 115(3): 774 - 780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. H. Cohen, A. Hrbek, R. B. Davis, S. C. Schachter, and D. M. Eisenberg Emerging Credentialing Practices, Malpractice Liability Policies, and Guidelines Governing Complementary and Alternative Medical Practices and Dietary Supplement Recommendations: A Descriptive Study of 19 Integrative Health Care Centers in the United States Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2005; 165(3): 289 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Rosenthal and E. Dean-Clower Integrative Medicine in Hematology/Oncology: Benefits, Ethical Considerations, and Controversies Hematology, January 1, 2005; 2005(1): 491 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ernst Ethics and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Ann Intern Med, June 3, 2003; 138(11): 940 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Eisenberg, M. H. Cohen, A. Hrbek, J. Grayzel, M. I. V. Rompay, and R. A. Cooper Credentialing Complementary and Alternative Medical Providers Ann Intern Med, December 17, 2002; 137(12): 965 - 973. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]