Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    PDF of this article (PDFs free after 6 months)    Summary for Patients    Summary for Patients (PDF)    Figures/Tables List    Related articles in Annals  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

CLINICAL GUIDELINES

Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations and Rationale

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force*

3 September 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 5 Part 1 | Pages 344-346

This statement summarizes the current U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations on screening for breast cancer and the supporting scientific evidence and updates the 1996 USPSTF recommendations on this topic. The complete USPSTF recommendation and rationale statement on this topic, which includes a brief review of the supporting evidence, is available through the USPSTF Web site (www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov), the National Guideline Clearinghouse (www.guideline.gov), and in print through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (telephone, 800-358-9295; e-mail, ahrqpubs{at}ahrq.gov). The complete information on which this statement is based, including evidence tables and references, is available in the accompanying article in this issue and in the summary of the evidence and systematic evidence review on the Web sites already mentioned.

To update its recommendations on screening for breast cancer, the USPSTF reviewed the evidence regarding the effectiveness of mammography, clinical breast examination, and breast self-examination in reducing breast cancer mortality. The USPSTF did not review the evidence regarding genetic screening, surveillance of women with prior breast cancer, or formal evaluation of new screening modalities that have not been studied in the general population. A meta-analysis using a Bayesian random-effects model was conducted for the USPSTF to obtain a summary of relative risk estimates of the effectiveness of screening with mammography, either alone or in combination with clinical breast examination, in reducing breast cancer mortality. Clinical studies that evaluated breast self-examination were included in the review. Sources for estimates cited in this Recommendation and Rationale statement are described in the systematic evidence review on this topic, which is available on the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov).

* For a list of the members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, see the Appendix.

Author and Article Information

From the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland.

Requests for Single Reprints: Reprints are available from the USPSTF Web site (http://www.preventiveservices.ahrq.gov) and in print through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Publications Clearinghouse (800-358-9295).

Related articles in Annals:

Clinical Guidelines
Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Linda L. Humphrey, Mark Helfand, Benjamin K.S. Chan, AND Steven H. Woolf

Annals 2002 137: 347-360. [ABSTRACT][SUMMARY][Full Text]  

Editorials
Screening Mammography for Younger Women: Back to Basics
Harold Sox

Annals 2002 137: 361-362. [Full Text]  

Editorials
The Mammography Dilemma: A Crisis for Evidence-Based Medicine?
Steven N. Goodman

Annals 2002 137: 363-365. [Full Text]  

Summaries for Patients
Screening for Breast Cancer: Recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Annals 2002 137: I-47. [Full Text]  

Letters
Screening for Breast Cancer
John K. Whiteford AND John Ryan Whiteford

Annals 2003 138: 768-769. [Full Text]  

Letters
Screening for Breast Cancer
Peter C. Gøtzsche

Annals 2003 138: 769-770. [Full Text]  

Letters
Screening for Breast Cancer
Linda L. Humphrey, Mark Helfand, AND Benjamin K.S. Chan

Annals 2003 138: 770. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Mammography Dilemma
Alfred O. Berg, Janet Allan, AND Steven Woolf

Annals 2003 138: 770-771. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Mammography Dilemma
Donald E. Stanley

Annals 2003 138: 771. [Full Text]  

Letters
The Mammography Dilemma
Steven N. Goodman

Annals 2003 138: 771. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. Hofvind, P. M. Vacek, J. Skelly, D. L. Weaver, and B. M. Geller Comparing Screening Mammography for Early Breast Cancer Detection in Vermont and Norway J Natl Cancer Inst, August 6, 2008; 100(15): 1082 - 1091. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. F. Wharam, A. A. Galbraith, K. P. Kleinman, S. B. Soumerai, D. Ross-Degnan, and B. E. Landon Cancer Screening before and after Switching to a High-Deductible Health Plan Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2008; 148(9): 647 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Williams, K. Lindquist, R. L. Sudore, K. E. Covinsky, and L. C. Walter Screening Mammography in Older Women: Effect of Wealth and Prognosis Arch Intern Med, March 10, 2008; 168(5): 514 - 520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Tyndel, J. Austoker, B. J. Henderson, K. Brain, C. Bankhead, A. Clements, and E. K. Watson What Is the Psychological Impact of Mammographic Screening on Younger Women With a Family History of Breast Cancer? Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study by the PIMMS Management Group J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2007; 25(25): 3823 - 3830. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. P. Poplack, T. D. Tosteson, W. A. Wells, B. W. Pogue, P. M. Meaney, A. Hartov, C. A. Kogel, S. K. Soho, J. J. Gibson, and K. D. Paulsen Electromagnetic Breast Imaging: Results of a Pilot Study in Women with Abnormal Mammograms Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 350 - 359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Qaseem, V. Snow, K. Sherif, M. Aronson, K. B. Weiss, D. K. Owens, and for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee Screening Mammography for Women 40 to 49 Years of Age: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, April 3, 2007; 146(7): 511 - 515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. M. Ko, M. J. Nicholas, J. B. Mendel, and P. J. Slanetz Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2006; 187(6): 1483 - 1491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Rakowski, H. Meissner, S. W. Vernon, N. Breen, B. Rimer, and M. A. Clark Correlates of Repeat and Recent Mammography for Women Ages 45 to 75 in the 2002 to 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 2003). Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2006; 15(11): 2093 - 2101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. R. Holford, K. A. Cronin, A. B. Mariotto, and E. J. Feuer Chapter 4: Changing Patterns in Breast Cancer Incidence Trends J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2006; 2006(36): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Paskett, C. Tatum, J. Rushing, R. Michielutte, R. Bell, K. L. Foley, M. Bittoni, S. L. Dickinson, A. S. McAlearney, and K. Reeves Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2006; 98(17): 1226 - 1237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. N. Feigin, D. M. Keating, P. M. Telford, and M. A. Cohen Clinical Breast Examination in a Comprehensive Breast Cancer Screening Program: Contribution and Cost Radiology, September 1, 2006; 240(3): 650 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. T. Heflin, K. I. Pollak, M. N. Kuchibhatla, L. G. Branch, and E. Z. Oddone The impact of health status on physicians' intentions to offer cancer screening to older women. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2006; 61(8): 844 - 850. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. K. Stout, M. A. Rosenberg, A. Trentham-Dietz, M. A. Smith, S. M. Robinson, and D. G. Fryback Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst, June 7, 2006; 98(11): 774 - 782. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. B. Barton Exploring and crossing the disparity divide in cancer mortality. Ann Intern Med, April 18, 2006; 144(8): 614 - 616. [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Chew, J. Mandelbaum-Schmid, and S. K. Gao Can Health Journalists Bridge the State-of-the-Science Gap in Mammography Guidelines? Science Communication, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 331 - 351. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. J. Lee, K. Lindquist, M. R. Segal, and K. E. Covinsky Development and Validation of a Prognostic Index for 4-Year Mortality in Older Adults JAMA, February 15, 2006; 295(7): 801 - 808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Crandall and J. P. Pregler Update in Women's Health Ann Intern Med, December 6, 2005; 143(11): 823 - 829. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. W. Bynum, J. B. Braunstein, P. Sharkey, K. Haddad, and A. W. Wu The Influence of Health Status, Age, and Race on Screening Mammography in Elderly Women Arch Intern Med, October 10, 2005; 165(18): 2083 - 2088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. L. Lipscombe, J. E. Hux, and G. L. Booth Reduced Screening Mammography Among Women With Diabetes Arch Intern Med, October 10, 2005; 165(18): 2090 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kerlikowske, J. Creasman, J. W. T. Leung, R. Smith-Bindman, and V. L. Ernster Differences in Screening Mammography Outcomes Among White, Chinese, and Filipino Women Arch Intern Med, September 12, 2005; 165(16): 1862 - 1868. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. D. Nelson, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, and E. L. Harris Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med, September 6, 2005; 143(5): 362 - 379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. G. Elmore, K. Armstrong, C. D. Lehman, and S. W. Fletcher Screening for Breast Cancer JAMA, March 9, 2005; 293(10): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Eberl, M. R. Baer, M. C. Mahoney, S. N. J. Sait, A. W. Block, and C. D. Farrell Unsuspected Klinefelter Syndrome Diagnosed during Oncologic Evaluation: A Case Series J Am Board Fam Med, March 1, 2005; 18(2): 132 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Oestreicher, C. D. Lehman, D. J. Seger, D. S. M. Buist, and E. White The Incremental Contribution of Clinical Breast Examination to Invasive Cancer Detection in a Mammography Screening Program Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 428 - 432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. J. Barth Jr., G. R. Gibson, P. A. Carney, L. A. Mott, R. D. Becher, and S. P. Poplack Detection of Breast Cancer on Screening Mammography Allows Patients to Be Treated with Less-Toxic Therapy Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2005; 184(1): 324 - 329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. J Feuer, R. Etzioni, K. A Cronin, and A. Mariotto The use of modeling to understand the impact of screening on US mortality: examples from mammography and PSA testing Statistical Methods in Medical Research, December 1, 2004; 13(6): 421 - 442. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. McDonald, D. Saslow, and M. H. Alciati Performance and Reporting of Clinical Breast Examination: A Review of the Literature CA Cancer J Clin, November 1, 2004; 54(6): 345 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. B. Clauser Use of Cancer Performance Measures in Population Health: A Macro-level Perspective J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 142 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Murff, D. R. Spigel, and S. Syngal Does This Patient Have a Family History of Cancer?: An Evidence-Based Analysis of the Accuracy of Family Cancer History JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1480 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Jerant, P. Franks, J. E. Jackson, and M. P. Doescher Age-Related Disparities in Cancer Screening: Analysis of 2001 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Data Ann. Fam. Med, September 1, 2004; 2(5): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Chamot, A. Charvet, and T. V. Perneger Women's Preferences for Doctor's Involvement in Decisions about Mammography Screening Med Decis Making, August 1, 2004; 24(4): 379 - 385. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, and and the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committe Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1999 - 2010. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, and the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committe, N. G. Clark, C. Doyle, T. Gansler, T. Glynn, Y. Hong, R. A. Smith, et al. Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association CA Cancer J Clin, July 1, 2004; 54(4): 190 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Eyre, R. Kahn, and R. M. Robertson Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Diabetes Care, July 1, 2004; 27(7): 1812 - 1824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Eyre, R. Kahn, R. M. Robertson, the ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committee, ACS/ADA/AHA Collaborative Writing Committee Member, N. G. Clark, C. Doyle, Y. Hong, T. Gansler, T. Glynn, et al. Preventing Cancer, Cardiovascular Disease, and Diabetes: A Common Agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3244 - 3255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Carnes and J. E. Mahoney Update in Women's Health Ann Intern Med, April 6, 2004; 140(7): 538 - 544. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 43 - 55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. A Freedman, D. B Petitti, and J. M Robins Rejoinder Int. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2004; 33(1): 69 - 73. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. J. Jorgensen and P. C Gotzsche Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study BMJ, January 17, 2004; 328(7432): 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. O. Berg Mammography Screening: Are Women Really Giving Informed Consent? (Counterpoint) J Natl Cancer Inst, October 15, 2003; 95(20): 1511 - 1512. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Domenighetti, B. D'Avanzo, M. Egger, F. Berrino, T. Perneger, P. Mosconi, and M. Zwahlen Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four countries Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 32(5): 816 - 821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Kerlikowske, R. Smith-Bindman, B.-M. Ljung, and D. Grady Evaluation of Abnormal Mammography Results and Palpable Breast Abnormalities Ann Intern Med, August 19, 2003; 139(4): 274 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Boyle Global summit on mammographic screening Ann. Onc., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 1159 - 1160. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. H. Fletcher Screening Sigmoidoscopy-- How Often and How Good? JAMA, July 2, 2003; 290(1): 106 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Gotzsche Screening for Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 769 - 770. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. O. Berg, J. Allan, and S. Woolf The Mammography Dilemma Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 770 - 771. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. N. Goodman The Mammography Dilemma Ann Intern Med, May 6, 2003; 138(9): 771 - 771. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Fletcher and J. G. Elmore Mammographic Screening for Breast Cancer N. Engl. J. Med., April 24, 2003; 348(17): 1672 - 1680. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. B. Thomas, D. L. Gao, R. M. Ray, W. W. Wang, C. J. Allison, F. L. Chen, P. Porter, Y. W. Hu, G. L. Zhao, L. D. Pan, et al. Randomized Trial of Breast Self-Examination in Shanghai: Final Results J Natl Cancer Inst, October 2, 2002; 94(19): 1445 - 1457. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]