Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 July 2002 | Volume 137 Issue 1 | Pages 59-69
Purpose: Chemoprevention offers promise as a strategy for reducing morbidity and mortality from breast cancer in women. This review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of chemoprevention in women without a history of breast cancer.
Data Sources: MEDLINE (1966 to December 2001).
Study Selection: English-language, randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of chemoprevention of breast cancer in women without a previous diagnosis of breast cancer were examined, and 4 relevant trials, 3 involving tamoxifen and 1 involving raloxifene, were selected. Trials that provided data on the harms of tamoxifen or raloxifene, studies of the costs of chemoprevention, and studies of risk assessment were also reviewed.
Data Extraction: Four reviewers independently abstracted data on key variables, including study population, sample size, randomization, treatment, and outcomes.
Data Synthesis: The largest of the RCTs of tamoxifen reported a 49% reduction in relative risk (0.51 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.66]) for invasive cancer among women with an estimated 5-year breast cancer risk of at least 1.66%. The other tamoxifen trials did not observe a statistically significant benefit, but only a few women in each trial took tamoxifen during the entire study period. The raloxifene study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis found a 76% reduction in relative risk (0.24 [CI, 0.13 to 0.44]) for invasive breast cancer. Tamoxifen and raloxifene were effective only against estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Both drugs increased risk for venous thromboembolic disease and hot flashes; tamoxifen increased risk for endometrial cancer and stroke.
Conclusions: Tamoxifen and raloxifene reduce the incidence of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in women. The relative risk reduction seems similar across all breast cancer risk groups. The absolute risk reduction varies by risk factors for breast cancer, however, and must be balanced against the potential harms to judge the appropriateness of treatment for individual women.
Author and Article Information
From Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Virginia Commonwealth University, Fairfax, Virginia; American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Disclaimer: The authors of this article are responsible for its contents, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the U.S. Department of Defense, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank David Atkins, MD, MPH, Director; Dana Best, MD, MPH; and Eve Shapiro of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Clinical Prevention Program. They thank Carmen Lewis, MD, MPH, and Margaret Wooddell, MA, for assistance in reviewing the studies of tamoxifen and raloxifene cited in this paper; Audrina J. Bunton, BA, and Lynn Whitener, MSLS, DrPH, of University of North Carolina, and Sonya Sutton, BSPH, and Loraine Monroe of the Research Triangle Institute; and Bahjat Qaqish, MD, PhD, for statistical assistance.
Grant Support: This study was developed by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Contract No. 290-97-0011), Rockville, Maryland.
Requests for Reprints: Reprints are available from the AHRQ Web site at http://www.ahrq.gov (click on Preventive Services) and in print through the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse (800-358-9295).
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Kinsinger: Program on Prevention, CB# 7508, Wing D, Room 383, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7508.
Dr. Harris: Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, CB# 7590, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Airport Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590.
Dr. Woolf: Department of Family Practice, Virginia Commonwealth University, 3712 Charles Stewart Drive, Fairfax, VA 22033.
Dr. Sox: American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine, 190 N. Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-1572.
Dr. Lohr: Research Triangle Institute, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194. CLINICAL GUIDELINES
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. T. Chlebowski, G. L. Anderson, D. S. Lane, A. K. Aragaki, T. Rohan, S. Yasmeen, G. Sarto, C. A. Rosenberg, F. A. Hubbell, and For the Women's Health Initiative Investigators Predicting Risk of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women by Hormone Receptor Status J Natl Cancer Inst, November 21, 2007; 99(22): 1695 - 1705. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C J Fabian, B F Kimler, M S Mayo, and S A Khan Breast-tissue sampling for risk assessment and prevention Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 185 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Stanton, C. A. Bernaards, and P. A. Ganz The BCPT Symptom Scales: A Measure of Physical Symptoms for Women Diagnosed With or at Risk for Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, March 16, 2005; 97(6): 448 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Dunn, D. L. Wickerham, and L. G. Ford Prevention of Hormone-Related Cancers: Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., January 10, 2005; 23(2): 357 - 367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ziv, J. Tice, R. Smith-Bindman, J. Shepherd, S. Cummings, and K. Kerlikowske Mammographic Density and Estrogen Receptor Status of Breast Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2004; 13(12): 2090 - 2095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. L. Lewis, L. S. Kinsinger, R. P. Harris, and R. J. Schwartz Breast Cancer Risk in Primary Care: Implications for Chemoprevention Arch Intern Med, September 27, 2004; 164(17): 1897 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. McKelvey Jr. and J. P. Evans Cancer Genetics in Primary Care J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3767S - 3772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
OTHER ARTICLES NOTED (Nov 01 to 18 Oct 02) Evid. Based Nurs., January 1, 2003; 6(1): e1 - 1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham, and W. M. Cronin National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Update: Prevention Trials and Endocrine Therapy of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 495S - 501S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Lippman and W. K. Hong Cancer Prevention Science and Practice Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5119 - 5125. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Chemoprevention of Breast Cancer Journal Watch (General), July 19, 2002; 2002(719): 1 - 1. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. G. Mulley Jr. and K. Sepucha Making Good Decisions about Breast Cancer Chemoprevention Ann Intern Med, July 2, 2002; 137(1): 52 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||