Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    PDF of this article (PDFs free after 6 months)    Figures/Tables List  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Wendler, D.    Prasad, K.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES

Core Safeguards for Clinical Research with Adults Who Are Unable To Consent

Dave Wendler, PhD, and Kiran Prasad, BS

2 October 2001 | Volume 135 Issue 7 | Pages 514-523

The National Bioethics Advisory Commission has proposed new safeguards for clinical research with adults who are unable to consent. Three other major U.S. groups have also proposed additional safeguards for this population, and existing Canadian and European guidelines already include such safeguards. While these six guidelines agree on some safeguards, they disagree on others. To allow important research to proceed while protecting adults who are unable to consent, it will be crucial to resolve these differences. This paper uses a side-by-side comparison of these six guidelines to highlight their major points of consensus, analyze their significant differences, and distill six core safeguards.

Author and Article Information

From the Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are the authors' and do not represent any position or policy of the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Public Health Service, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Acknowledgment: The authors thank Frank Miller, Alan Fleischman, Jim Childress, Rebecca Dresser, Don Rosenstein, Evan DeRenzo, David Shore, Jack Schwartz, Steve Burton, and Ezekiel Emanuel for their helpful suggestions.

Requests for Single Reprints: Dave Wendler, PhD, Room 1C118, Building 10, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Wendler and Ms. Prasad: Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Room 1C118, Building 10, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. S. Black, J. Brandt, P. V. Rabins, Q. M. Samus, C. D. Steele, C. G. Lyketsos, and A. Rosenblatt Predictors of Providing Informed Consent or Assent for Research Participation in Assisted Living Residents Am J Geriatr Psychiatry, January 1, 2008; 16(1): 83 - 91. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y.H. Kim and K. Kieburtz Appointing a proxy for research consent after one develops dementia: The need for further study Neurology, May 9, 2006; 66(9): 1298 - 1299. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Stocking, G. W. Hougham, D. D. Danner, M. B. Patterson, P. J. Whitehouse, and G. A. Sachs Speaking of research advance directives: Planning for future research participation Neurology, May 9, 2006; 66(9): 1361 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. I. Shalowitz, E. Garrett-Mayer, and D. Wendler The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med, March 13, 2006; 166(5): 493 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y H Kim When Does Decisional Impairment Become Decisional Incompetence? Ethical and Methodological Issues in Capacity Research in Schizophrenia Schizophr Bull, January 1, 2006; 32(1): 92 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Muthappan, H. Forster, and D. Wendler Research Advance Directives: Protection or Obstacle? Am J Psychiatry, December 1, 2005; 162(12): 2389 - 2391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Wendler Can We Ensure That All Research Subjects Give Valid Consent? Arch Intern Med, November 8, 2004; 164(20): 2201 - 2204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Y.H. Kim, P. S. Appelbaum, D. V. Jeste, and J. T. Olin Proxy and Surrogate Consent in Geriatric Neuropsychiatric Research: Update and Recommendations Am J Psychiatry, May 1, 2004; 161(5): 797 - 806. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. J. Silverman, J. M. Luce, and J. Schwartz Protecting Subjects with Decisional Impairment in Research: The Need for a Multifaceted Approach Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 1, 2004; 169(1): 10 - 14. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. Stocking, G. W. Hougham, A. R. Baron, and G. A. Sachs Are the rules for research with subjects with dementia changing?: Views from the field Neurology, December 23, 2003; 61(12): 1649 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]