|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 October 2001 | Volume 135 Issue 7 | Pages 507-513
A reflection on the scientific behavior of adherents of conventional medicine toward one form of alternative medicinehomeopathyteaches us that physicians do reject seemingly solid evidence because it is not compatible with theory. Further reflection, however, shows that physicians do the same within conventional medical science: Sometimes they discard a theory because of new facts, but at other times they cling to a theory despite the facts. This essay highlights the seeming contradiction and discusses whether it still permits the building of rational medical science. We propose that rational science is compatible with physicians' behavior, provided that physicians acknowledge the subjective element in the evaluation of science, as exemplified in the crossword analogy by the philosopher Haack. This type of thinking fits very well with the Bayesian approach to decision making that has been advocated for decades in clinical medicine. It does not lead to complete and uncontrollable subjectivity because discernment between rivaling explanations is still possible through argument and counterargument.
Author and Article Information
From Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Professor M. Kirsch-Volders from the Department of Biology, Free University of Brussels, for a useful discussion about the distinction between "religious belief" and "scientific theory," and Dr. W. Wieling from the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Professor R.G.W. Westendorp from the Leiden University Medical Center, and Professor G. de Vries from the Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, for discussing examples.
Requests for Single Reprints: Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Building 1, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail, vdbroucke{at}mail.medfac.leidenuniv.nl.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Vandenbroucke and de Craen: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Building 1, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands. ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE SERIES Series Editors: David M. Eisenberg, MD, and Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD
Alternative Medicine: A "Mirror Image" for Scientific Reasoning in Conventional Medicine
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P Vandenbroucke Commentary: Maziak's essay, seen from another angle Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 38(2): 410 - 412. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Thijs, W. A. Wagenaar, H.A.M. Middelkoop, W. Wieling, and J. G. van Dijk Transient loss of consciousness through the eyes of a witness Neurology, November 18, 2008; 71(21): 1713 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Thangapazham, J. P. Gaddipati, N. V. Rajeshkumar, A. Sharma, A. K. Singh, J. A. Ives, R. K. Maheshwari, and W. B. Jonas Homeopathic Medicines Do Not Alter Growth and Gene Expression in Prostate and Breast Cancer Cells In Vitro Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 356 - 361. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S Guzelian, M. S Victoroff, N C. Halmes, R. C James, and C. P Guzelian Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2005; 24(4): 161 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Shuval and N. Mizrachi Changing Boundaries: Modes of Coexistence of Alternative and Biomedicine Qual Health Res, May 1, 2004; 14(5): 675 - 690. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ernst The "Improbability" of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Arch Intern Med, April 26, 2004; 164(8): 914 - 915. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Glasziou, J. Vandenbroucke, and I. Chalmers Assessing the quality of research BMJ, January 3, 2004; 328(7430): 39 - 41. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-D. Ricard Are We Really Reducing Tidal Volume--And Should We? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2003; 167(10): 1297 - 1298. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ernst Alternative Medicine: A Mirror Image for Scientific Medicine Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 546 - 546. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Vandenbroucke Alternative treatments in reproductive medicine: The vexing problem of `seemingly impeccable trials....' Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2228 - 2229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Feder and T. Katz Randomised controlled trials for homoeopathy BMJ, March 2, 2002; 324(7336): 498 - 499. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P Vandenbroucke Commentary: Treatment of bladder stones and probabilistic reasoning in medicine: an 1835 account and its lessons for the present Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 30(6): 1253 - 1258. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||