Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Vandenbroucke, J. P.
space
  arrow  de Craen, A. J.M.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE SERIES Series Editors: David M. Eisenberg, MD, and Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD

Alternative Medicine: A "Mirror Image" for Scientific Reasoning in Conventional Medicine

right arrow Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD, and Anton J.M. de Craen, PhD

2 October 2001 | Volume 135 Issue 7 | Pages 507-513

A reflection on the scientific behavior of adherents of conventional medicine toward one form of alternative medicine—homeopathy—teaches us that physicians do reject seemingly solid evidence because it is not compatible with theory. Further reflection, however, shows that physicians do the same within conventional medical science: Sometimes they discard a theory because of new facts, but at other times they cling to a theory despite the facts. This essay highlights the seeming contradiction and discusses whether it still permits the building of rational medical science. We propose that rational science is compatible with physicians' behavior, provided that physicians acknowledge the subjective element in the evaluation of science, as exemplified in the crossword analogy by the philosopher Haack. This type of thinking fits very well with the Bayesian approach to decision making that has been advocated for decades in clinical medicine. It does not lead to complete and uncontrollable subjectivity because discernment between rivaling explanations is still possible through argument and counterargument.

Author and Article Information
space

From Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Professor M. Kirsch-Volders from the Department of Biology, Free University of Brussels, for a useful discussion about the distinction between "religious belief" and "scientific theory," and Dr. W. Wieling from the Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Professor R.G.W. Westendorp from the Leiden University Medical Center, and Professor G. de Vries from the Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam, for discussing examples.

Requests for Single Reprints: Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Building 1, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail, vdbroucke{at}mail.medfac.leidenuniv.nl.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Vandenbroucke and de Craen: Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Building 1, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.


Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Alternative Medicine: A Mirror Image for Scientific Medicine
Edzard Ernst
Annals 2002 137: 546. [Full Text]  

Letters
Alternative Medicine: A Mirror Image for Scientific Medicine
Jan P. Vandenbroucke AND Anton J.M. de Craen
Annals 2002 137: 546-547. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr Cancer TherHome page
R. L. Thangapazham, J. P. Gaddipati, N. V. Rajeshkumar, A. Sharma, A. K. Singh, J. A. Ives, R. K. Maheshwari, and W. B. Jonas
Homeopathic medicines do not alter growth and gene expression in prostate and breast cancer cells in vitro.
Integr Cancer Ther, December 1, 2006; 5(4): 356 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
P. S Guzelian, M. S Victoroff, N C. Halmes, R. C James, and C. P Guzelian
Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation
Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2005; 24(4): 161 - 201.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Health ResHome page
J. T. Shuval and N. Mizrachi
Changing Boundaries: Modes of Coexistence of Alternative and Biomedicine
Qual Health Res, May 1, 2004; 14(5): 675 - 690.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. Ernst
The "Improbability" of Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Arch Intern Med, April 26, 2004; 164(8): 914 - 915.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. Glasziou, J. Vandenbroucke, and I. Chalmers
Assessing the quality of research
BMJ, January 3, 2004; 328(7430): 39 - 41.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
J.-D. Ricard
Are We Really Reducing Tidal Volume--And Should We?
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., May 15, 2003; 167(10): 1297 - 1298.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
E. Ernst
Alternative Medicine: A Mirror Image for Scientific Medicine
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 546 - 546.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
J. P. Vandenbroucke
Alternative treatments in reproductive medicine: The vexing problem of `seemingly impeccable trials....'
Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2002; 17(9): 2228 - 2229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Feder and T. Katz
Randomised controlled trials for homoeopathy
BMJ, March 2, 2002; 324(7336): 498 - 499.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. P Vandenbroucke
Commentary: Treatment of bladder stones and probabilistic reasoning in medicine: an 1835 account and its lessons for the present
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2001; 30(6): 1253 - 1258.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2001 by the American College of Physicians.