Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article    PDF of this article (PDFs free after 6 months)    Related articles in Annals  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Kassirer, J. P.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

PERSPECTIVE

Pseudoaccountability

Jerome P. Kassirer, MD

3 April 2001 | Volume 134 Issue 7 | Pages 587-590

The public has long entrusted the medical profession to regulate its own practices, but our efforts to do so have been uneven. In place of rigorous, enforceable standards, we have sometimes reverted to pseudoaccountability: weak regulations that only give the appearance that we have been responsible in setting and enforcing high standards. We have failed to deal effectively with substandard practitioners, lagged in preventing medical errors, inadequately documented patient care in the medical record, slipped up in protecting patients in clinical research projects, and accepted financial arrangements with industry that may affect our judgment. In response, government has intervened, and threatens to intervene further with regulations that sometimes are excessively intrusive and cumbersome. To preserve our remaining autonomy, we must show that we are serious about protecting the public. Professional membership organizations must stop promulgating weak guidelines and offering evaluative methods to assess and regulate their own coveted members. Instead, they must turn over assessment of their members to arm's-length, disinterested groups. Regulatory programs must have provisions with impeccable standards, surveillance processes, and methods to deal with infractions. In planning new self-regulatory approaches, we should invite open discussion and genuine involvement by independent members of the public or the government to help ensure that our decisions about standard setting are not self-serving. Our profession has already lost much authority. We can ill afford to lose more.

Author and Article Information

From Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts; and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Requests for Single Reprints: Jerome P. Kassirer, MD, Office of the Dean, Tufts University School of Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02111-1800.

Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Pseudoaccountability
Richard R. Babb

Annals 2002 136: 631. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. W Sandstrom The Meanings of Autonomy for Physical Therapy Physical Therapy, January 1, 2007; 87(1): 98 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Harrow Chasing Shadows? Perspectives on Self-Regulation in UK Charity Fundraising Public Policy and Administration, September 1, 2006; 21(3): 86 - 104. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. L. Reinertsen Zen and the Art of Physician Autonomy Maintenance Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2003; 138(12): 992 - 995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. E. Bekelman, Y. Li, and C. P. Gross Scope and Impact of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review JAMA, January 22, 2003; 289(4): 454 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Steinbrook The Debate over Residents' Work Hours N. Engl. J. Med., October 17, 2002; 347(16): 1296 - 1302. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Barnes and P. S. Florencio Financial Conflicts of Interest in Human Subjects Research: The Problem of Institutional Conflicts J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2002; 30(3): 390 - 402. [PDF]

				F. J. Eismont, S. Anderson, R. L. Cruess, G. P. DeRosa, G. Kohn, S. Miller, and S. Weinstein Orthopaedic Recertification J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2002; 84(6): 1069 - 1077. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. G. Pawlson and M. E. O'Kane Professionalism, Regulation, And The Market: Impact On Accountability For Quality Of Care Health Aff., May 1, 2002; 21(3): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. R. Babb Pseudoaccountability Ann Intern Med, April 16, 2002; 136(8): 631 - 631. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Epstein and E. M. Hundert Defining and Assessing Professional Competence JAMA, January 9, 2002; 287(2): 226 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Millenson Moral Hazard vs. Real Hazard: Quality of Care Post-Arrow Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2001; 26(5): 1069 - 1080. [PDF]