Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Goldman, L. E.
space
  arrow  Eisenberg, M. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

UPDATE

Identification and Management of Patients with Failed Thrombolysis after Acute Myocardial Infarction

right arrow Lorne E. Goldman, MD, and Mark J. Eisenberg, MD, MPH

4 April 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 7 | Pages 556-565

Clinical outcome after thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction is closely related to restoration of flow in the infarct-related artery. Because thrombolytic therapy does not achieve coronary artery patency in 15% to 50% of patients, the early identification and treatment of patients with failed thrombolysis may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Unfortunately, the noninvasive identification of patients with failed thrombolysis continues to be problematic. Reduction in chest pain, decrease in ST-segment elevation, and presence of arrhythmias, although suggestive of reperfusion, are not diagnostic. Biochemical markers may hold promise for improved early identification of failed thrombolysis. In the setting of failed thrombolysis, clinical outcome may be improved by "rescue" percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of the infarct-related artery. Several studies suggest that successful rescue PTCA is associated with high technical success rates and improved clinical outcomes. However, these same studies also suggest that patients with failed rescue PTCA may have higher mortality rates than patients who are treated conservatively. On the basis of current data, if failed thrombolysis is suspected, rescue PTCA should be considered, particularly in patients with anterior myocardial infarction and early presentation. Further investigations are needed to study the role of adjunctive methods such as stenting, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition, and intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in the setting of rescue PTCA. Because of the relative lack of prospective data in this area, additional studies are urgently needed to help improve the ability to identify and manage patients with failed thrombolysis after acute myocardial infarction.

Author and Article Information
space

From Jewish General Hospital and McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Grant Support: Dr. Eisenberg is a Research Scholar of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Requests for Single Reprints: Mark J. Eisenberg, MD, MPH, Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, 3755 Côte-Ste-Catherine Road, Suite A-118, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada; e-mail, marke{at}epid.jgh.mcgill.ca.

Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Goldman: Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, 3755 Côte-Ste-Catherine Road, Room E-206, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada.

Dr. Eisenberg: Divisions of Cardiology and Clinical Epidemiology, Jewish General Hospital/McGill University, 3755 Côte-Ste-Catherine Road, Suite A-118, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
L. Testa, W.J. van Gaal, G.G.L. Biondi-Zoccai, A. Abbate, P. Agostoni, R. Bhindi, and A.P. Banning
Repeat thrombolysis or conservative therapy vs. rescue percutaneous coronary intervention for failed thrombolysis: systematic review and meta-analysis
QJM, May 1, 2008; 101(5): 387 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
H. C. Wijeysundera, R. Vijayaraghavan, B. K. Nallamothu, J. M. Foody, H. M. Krumholz, C. O. Phillips, A. Kashani, J. J. You, J. V. Tu, and D. T. Ko
Rescue Angioplasty or Repeat Fibrinolysis After Failed Fibrinolytic Therapy for ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 30, 2007; 49(4): 422 - 430.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
P. G. Steg, L. Francois, B. Iung, D. Himbert, P. Aubry, P. Charlier, H. Benamer, L. J. Feldman, and J.-M. Juliard
Long-term clinical outcomes after rescue angioplasty are not different from those of successful thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2005; 26(18): 1831 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
A. Schomig, G. Ndrepepa, J. Mehilli, J. Dirschinger, S. G. Nekolla, C. Schmitt, S. Martinoff, M. Seyfarth, M. Schwaiger, A. Kastrati, et al.
A randomized trial of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty as a rescue intervention after failed thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 2073 - 2079.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.