Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Caplan, A. L.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES

The Role of Guidelines in the Practice of Physician-Assisted Suicide

right arrow Arthur L. Caplan, PhD; Lois Snyder, JD; Kathy Faber-Langendoen, MD, for the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel

21 March 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 6 | Pages 476-481

Oregon has legalized and implemented physician-assisted suicide, while observers argue about the moral import of attempting to formulate guidelines; the utility any set of guidelines can have for physician practice, health care providers, patients, or families; and whether guidelines can really protect against harm or abuse. What were once theoretical questions have taken on new urgency.

The debate over the value and power of guidelines includes the following questions: What has been the experience of efforts to implement physician-assisted suicide using consensus guidelines? What goals are guidelines intended to serve? Who should formulate guidelines? What features should be reflected in any proposed guidelines to make them practical and to permit achievement of their goals? Are there any fundamental obstacles to the creation or implementation of guidelines? Is dying a process that is amenable to direction under guidelines, be they issued by physicians, departments of health, blue ribbon panels, or other regulatory bodies? This paper explores these questions as physician-assisted suicide becomes legal.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and SUNY Health Science Center, Syracuse, New York.

This paper was developed by the Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel as part of the Finding Common Ground Project of the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics. The paper was authored on behalf of the Panel by Arthur L. Caplan, PhD; Lois Snyder, JD; and Kathy Faber-Langendoen, MD. Members of the Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel were: Arthur Caplan, PhD (Chair); David A. Asch, MD, MBA; Rev. Ralph Ciampa; Kathy Faber-Langendoen, MD; Joseph J. Fins, MD; John Hansen-Flaschen, MD; Barbara Coombs Lee, FNP, JD; Franklin G. Miller, PhD; Sally J. Nunn, RN; David Orentlicher, MD, JD; Timothy E. Quill, MD; Elliott Rosen, EdD; James A. Tulsky, MD, and Lois Snyder, JD (Project Director). Primary clinical staff to the Panel was Jason Karlawish, MD. Additional staffing was provided by Jennifer Klocinski.

Grant Support: The Walter and Elise Haas Fund and the Wallace Alexander Gerbode Foundation supported the development of this paper and the Finding Common Ground Project on Assisted Suicide.

Requests for Single Reprints: Lois Snyder, JD, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308; e-mail, lsnyder{at}mail.acponline.org.

Requests for Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Caplan and Ms. Snyder: Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104-3308.

Dr. Faber-Langendoen: Program in Bioethics, SUNY Health Science Center, 750 East Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210.


Related articles in Annals:

Medicine and Public Issues
Assisted Suicide: Finding Common Ground
Lois Snyder AND Arthur L. Caplan
Annals 2000 132: 468-469. [Full Text]  

Medicine and Public Issues
Assisted Suicide Compared with Refusal of Treatment: A Valid Distinction?
Franklin G. Miller, Joseph J. Fins, Lois Snyder, AND for the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel
Annals 2000 132: 470-475. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  

Medicine and Public Issues
Should Assisted Suicide Be Only Physician Assisted?
Kathy Faber-Langendoen, Jason H.T. Karlawish, AND for the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel
Annals 2000 132: 482-487. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  

Medicine and Public Issues
Palliative Treatments of Last Resort: Choosing the Least Harmful Alternative
Timothy E. Quill, Barbara Coombs Lee, Sally Nunn, AND for the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel
Annals 2000 132: 488-493. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  

Medicine and Public Issues
Responding to Legal Requests for Physician-Assisted Suicide
James A. Tulsky, Ralph Ciampa, Elliott J. Rosen, AND for the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics Assisted Suicide Consensus Panel
Annals 2000 132: 494-499. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  

Letters
Palliative Treatment of Last Resort and Assisted Suicide
Lawrence K. Gates, Jr.
Annals 2000 133: 563-564. [Full Text]  

Letters
Palliative Treatment of Last Resort and Assisted Suicide
Lois Snyder AND Arthur L. Caplan
Annals 2000 133: 564. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
P. L Hudson, L. J Kristjanson, M. Ashby, B. Kelly, P. Schofield, R. Hudson, S. Aranda, M. O'Connor, and A. Street
Desire for hastened death in patients with advanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: a systematic review.
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2006; 20(7): 693 - 701.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. M. Wolf
Assessing Physician Compliance With the Rules for Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide
Arch Intern Med, August 8, 2005; 165(15): 1677 - 1679.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
R S Magnusson
Euthanasia: above ground, below ground
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2004; 30(5): 441 - 446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
R. S. Magnusson
"Underground Euthanasia" and the Harm Minimization Debate
J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2004; 32(3): 486 - 495.
[PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
C Gastmans, F Van Neste, and P Schotsmans
Facing requests for euthanasia: a clinical practice guideline
J. Med. Ethics, April 1, 2004; 30(2): 212 - 217.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
S Frileux, C Lelievre, M T Munoz Sastre, E Mullet, and P C Sorum
When is physician assisted suicide or euthanasia acceptable?
J. Med. Ethics, December 1, 2003; 29(6): 330 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. Snyder, D. P. Sulmasy, and for the Ethics and Human Rights Committee, America
Physician-Assisted Suicide
Ann Intern Med, August 7, 2001; 135(3): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
L. K. Gates Jr.
Palliative Treatment of Last Resort and Assisted Suicide
Ann Intern Med, October 3, 2000; 133(7): 563 - 564.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.