Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Morris, A. H.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical Decisions

right arrow Alan H. Morris, MD

7 March 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 5 | Pages 373-383

Humans have only a limited ability to incorporate information in decision making. In certain situations, the mismatch between this limitation and the availability of extensive information contributes to the varying performance and high error rate of clinical decision makers. Variation in clinical practice is due in part to clinicians' poor compliance with guidelines and recommended therapies. The use of decision-support tools is a response to both the information revolution and poor compliance. Computerized protocols used to deliver decision support can be configured to contain much more detail than textual guidelines or paper-based flow diagrams. Such protocols can generate patient-specific instructions for therapy that can be carried out with little interclinician variability; however, clinicians must be willing to modify personal styles of clinical management. Protocols need not be perfect. Several defensible and reasonable approaches are available for clinical problems. However, one of these reasonable approaches must be chosen and incorporated into the protocol to promote consistent clinical decisions. This reasoning is the basis of an explicit method of decision support that allows the rigorous evaluation of interventions, including use of the protocols themselves. Computerized protocols for mechanical ventilation and management of intravenous fluid and hemodynamic factors in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome provide case studies for this discussion.

Author and Article Information
space

From LDS Hospital and University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Acknowledgments: The author thanks the medical, nursing, and respiratory therapy staffs of the Intermountain Respiratory Intensive Care Unit and the Shock-Trauma/Intermountain Respiratory Intensive Care Unit and the Respiratory Care Department of LDS Hospital for collaboration during the past 25 years. He recognizes the contributions of Drs. James Orme Jr., Terry Clemmer, Lin Weaver, Frank Thomas, Tom East, Jane Wallace, George Thomsen, James Pearl, Nat Dean, and Brad Rasmusson for collaboration in protocol development and implementation. He thanks Drs. Robert Crapo and C. Gregory Elliott for critically reviewing the manuscript and Drs. Roberta Goldring, Robert Rogers, and Waldemar Johanson who, through their vision and insight 14 years ago, enabled this decision-support effort.

Grant Support: By the National Institutes of Health (RO1-HL-36787, NO1-HR-46062), the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS 06594), the Deseret Foundation, the Respiratory Distress Syndrome Foundation, LDS Hospital, and IHC, Inc.

Requests for Single Reprints: Alan H. Morris, MD, Pulmonary Division, LDS Hospital, Eighth Avenue and C Street, Salt Lake City, UT 84143; e-mail, ldamorri{at}ihc.com

Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc Am Thorac SocHome page
B. T. Thompson and D. Schoenfeld
Usual Care as the Control Group in Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacologic Interventions
Proceedings of the ATS, October 1, 2007; 4(7): 577 - 582.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
J. B. Boord, M. Sharifi, R. A. Greevy, M. R. Griffin, V. K. Lee, T. A. Webb, M. E. May, L. R. Waitman, A. K. May, and R. A. Miller
Computer-based Insulin Infusion Protocol Improves Glycemia Control over Manual Protocol
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2007; 14(3): 278 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acut
Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury
N. Engl. J. Med., May 25, 2006; 354(21): 2213 - 2224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. H. Samore, K. Bateman, S. C. Alder, E. Hannah, S. Donnelly, G. J. Stoddard, B. Haddadin, M. A. Rubin, J. Williamson, B. Stults, et al.
Clinical Decision Support and Appropriateness of Antimicrobial Prescribing: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, November 9, 2005; 294(18): 2305 - 2314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
S. I. Dara and B. Afessa
Intensivist-to-Bed Ratio: Association With Outcomes in the Medical ICU
Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2): 567 - 572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Kawamoto, C. A Houlihan, E A. Balas, and D. F Lobach
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
BMJ, April 2, 2005; 330(7494): 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
M. M. Kuilboer, M. A. M. van Wijk, M. Mosseveld, and J. van der Lei
AsthmaCritic: Issues in Designing a Noninquisitive Critiquing System for Daily Practice
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., September 1, 2003; 10(5): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Reinertsen
Zen and the Art of Physician Autonomy Maintenance
Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2003; 138(12): 992 - 995.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
B. Yueh, E. M. Weaver, E. H. Bradley, H. M. Krumholz, P. Heagerty, A. Conley, and C. T. Sasaki
A Critical Evaluation of Critical Pathways in Head and Neck Cancer
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2003; 129(1): 89 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
A H Morris
Decision support and safety of clinical environments
Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2002; 11(1): 69 - 75.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
E. W. Ely, M. O. Meade, E. F. Haponik, M. H. Kollef, D. J. Cook, G. H. Guyatt, and J. K. Stoller
Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Protocols Driven by Nonphysician Health-Care Professionals : Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines
Chest, December 1, 2001; 120(6_suppl): 454S - 463S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
W. H. Geerts, J. A. Heit, G. P. Clagett, G. F. Pineo, C. W. Colwell, F. A. Anderson Jr., and H. B. Wheeler
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism
Chest, January 1, 2001; 119(1_suppl): 132S - 175S.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.