Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Sofair, A. N.
space
  arrow  Kaldjian, L. C.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Eugenic Sterilization and a Qualified Nazi Analogy: The United States and Germany, 1930-1945

right arrow André N. Sofair, MD, MPH, and Lauris C. Kaldjian, MD

15 February 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 4 | Pages 312-319

In the United States and Germany before World War II, physicians participated in state-authorized eugenic sterilization programs in an attempt to prevent persons deemed to possess undesirable heritable characteristics from propagating. A comparison of U.S. and German histories reveals similarities that argue against easy dismissal of a Nazi analogy. On the basis of a review of editorials in The New England Journal of Medicine and Journal of the American Medical Association from 1930 to 1945 it is difficult to accept the suggestion that the alliance between the medical profession and the eugenics movement in the United States was short-lived. Comparison of the histories of the eugenic sterilization campaigns in the United States and Nazi Germany reveals important similarities of motivation, intent, and strategy and differences that explain why support for eugenic sterilization in the United States gradually weakened. The eugenics movement in Germany was influenced by economic crisis, radical nationalism, Hitler's totalitarianism, and the medical profession's willing participation and attraction to Nazism for financial and ideological reasons. In the United States, a combination of public unease, Roman Catholic opposition, federal democracy, judicial review, and critical scrutiny by the medical profession reversed the momentum of the eugenics movement and led to the conclusion that eugenic sterilization should be voluntary.

Author and Article Information
space

From Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Professors Garland E. Allen, Margaret A. Farley, Robert J. Levine, Robert N. Proctor, Asghar Rastegar, and Piero Rinaldo for critical review of the manuscript at various stages; the anonymous reviewers for detailed and constructive comments; Heather E. Kaldjian, LLB, for research assistance; and Mary Sofair for assistance in preparing the manuscript.

Grant Support: By a Fellowship for Research on Medical Ethics and the Holocaust granted by the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies, the scholarly division of the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, with funds provided by the Merck Company Foundation.

Requests for Single Reprints: André N. Sofair, MD, MPH, Yale Primary Care Internal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, Waterbury Hospital, Sixth Floor, 64 Robbins Street, Waterbury, CT, 06721.

Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Sofair: Yale Primary Care Internal Medicine Residency Program, Department of Medicine, Waterbury Hospital, Sixth Floor, 64 Robbins Street, Waterbury, CT 06721.

Dr. Kaldjian: Yale Primary Care Internal Medicine Residency Program, St. Mary's Hospital, Department of Medicine, 56 Franklin Street, Waterbury, CT 06706.


Related articles in Annals:

Letters
Eugenic Sterilization and a Nazi Analogy
Jay A. Nathanson AND Michael A. Grodin
Annals 2000 132: 1008. [Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
K G Fulda and K Lykens
Ethical issues in predictive genetic testing: a public health perspective.
J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2006; 32(3): 143 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
S. A. Hoskins
Nurses and National Socialism a Moral Dilemma: one historical example of a route - to euthanasia
Nursing Ethics, January 1, 2005; 12(1): 79 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. A. Nathanson and M. A. Grodin
Eugenic Sterilization and a Nazi Analogy
Ann Intern Med, June 20, 2000; 132(12): 1008 - 1008.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.