Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 February 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 4 | Pages 261-269
Background: Screening for hereditary hemochromatosis is traditionally done by using serum iron studies. However, mutation analysis of the hemochromatosis-associated HFE gene has recently become available.
Objective: To compare the cost-effectiveness of no screening with four screening strategies that incorporate HFE gene testing or serum iron studies.
Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis.
Data Sources: Published literature.
Target Population: Siblings and children of an affected proband.
Time Horizon: Lifetime from 10 years of age (children) or 45 years of age (siblings).
Perspective: Societal.
Intervention: 1] Serum iron studies. 2) Gene testing of the proband. If the proband is homozygous (C282Y+/+), the spouse undergoes gene testing; if he or she is heterozygous [C282Y+/], the children undergo gene testing. 3) Gene testing of the proband; if he or she is homozygous, relatives undergo gene testing. 4) Direct gene testing of relatives.
Outcome Measures: Cost per life-year saved and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.
Results of Base-Case Analysis: In children, HFE gene testing of the proband was the most cost-effective strategy for screening one child (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $508 per life-year saved). HFE gene testing of the proband followed by testing of the spouse was the most cost-effective strategy for screening two or more children (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $3665 per life-year saved). In siblings, all screening strategies were dominant compared with no screening. Strategies using HFE gene testing were less costly than serum iron studies.
Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Despite varying the prevalence of mutations and regardless of the cost of the genetic test in one- and two-way sensitivity analyses, HFE gene testing remained cost-effective.
Conclusions: HFE gene testing for the C282Y mutation is a cost-effective method of screening relatives of patients with hereditary hemochromatosis.
Author and Article Information
From Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Professor Denis M. McCarthy for his overall support and Amnon Sonnenberg, MD, MSc, for advice on mathematical issues.
Grant Support: In part by a Glaxo Wellcome Foundation for Digestive Health Award for Outcomes Research (Dr. El-Serag) and by the Veterans Affairs HSR&D Houston Center of Excellence.
Requests for Single Reprints: John M. Inadomi, MD, Divisions of Gastroenterology and Health Services Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2215 Fuller Road (111-D), Ann Arbor, MI 48105; e-mail, jinadomi{at}umich.edu.
Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. El-Serag: Health Services Research Section (152), Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, 2002 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030.
Dr. Inadomi: Divisions of Gastroenterology and Health Services Research, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2215 Fuller Road (111-D), Ann Arbor, MI 48105; e-mail, jinadomi{at}umich.edu.
Dr. Kowdley: Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, University of Washington Medical Center, Box 356154, Seattle, WA 98195.
Author Contributions: Conception and design: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi, K.V. Kowdley.
Analysis and interpretation of the data: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi, K.V. Kowdley.
Drafting of the article: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi, K.V. Kowdley.
Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi, K.V. Kowdley.
Final approval of the article: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi, K.V. Kowdley.
Statistical expertise: H.B. El-Serag, J.M. Inadomi.
Administrative, technical, or logistic support: H.B. El-Serag. ARTICLE
Screening for Hereditary Hemochromatosis in Siblings and Children of Affected Patients: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
![]()
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Cooper, J. Bryant, J. Picot, A. Clegg, P.R. Roderick, W.M. Rosenberg, and C. Patch A decision analysis model for diagnostic strategies using DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis in at risk populations QJM, August 1, 2008; 101(8): 631 - 641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Bryant, K Cooper, J Picot, A Clegg, P Roderick, W Rosenberg, and C Patch A systematic review of the clinical validity and clinical utility of DNA testing for hereditary haemochromatosis type 1 in at-risk populations J. Med. Genet., August 1, 2008; 45(8): 513 - 518. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.K. Limdi and J.R. Crampton Hereditary haemochromatosis QJM, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 315 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Donaldson, G. Currie, and C. Mitton Cost effectiveness analysis in health care: contraindications BMJ, October 19, 2002; 325(7369): 891 - 894. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Hanson, G. Imperatore, and W. Burke HFE Gene and Hereditary Hemochromatosis: A HuGE Review Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2001; 154(3): 193 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||