Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Nanda, K.
space
  arrow  Matchar, D. B.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REVIEW

Accuracy of the Papanicolaou Test in Screening for and Follow-up of Cervical Cytologic Abnormalities

A Systematic Review

right arrow Kavita Nanda, MD, MHS; Douglas C. McCrory, MD, MHSc; Evan R. Myers, MD, MPH; Lori A. Bastian, MD, MPH; Vic Hasselblad, PhD; Jason D. Hickey; and David B. Matchar, MD

16 May 2000 | Volume 132 Issue 10 | Pages 810-819

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of conventional and new methods of Papanicolaou (Pap) testing when used to detect cervical cancer and its precursors.

Data Sources: Systematic search of English-language literature through October 1999 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, other computerized databases, and hand searching.

Study Selection: All studies that compared Pap testing (conventional methods, computer screening or rescreening, or monolayer cytology) with a concurrent reference standard (histologic examination, colposcopy, or cytology).

Data Extraction: Two reviewers independently reviewed selection criteria and completed 2 x 2 tables for each study.

Data Synthesis: 94 studies of the conventional Pap test and three studies of monolayer cytology met inclusion criteria. No studies of computerized screening were included. Data were organized by cytologic and histologic thresholds used to define disease. For conventional Pap tests, estimates of sensitivity and specificity varied greatly in individual studies. Methodologic quality and frequency of histologic abnormalities also varied greatly between studies. In the 12 studies with the least biased estimates, sensitivity ranged from 30% to 87% and specificity ranged from 86% to 100%.

Conclusions: Insufficient high-quality data exist to estimate test operating characteristics of new cytologic methods for cervical screening. Future studies of these technologies should apply adequate reference standards. Most studies of the conventional Pap test are severely biased: The best estimates suggest that it is only moderately accurate and does not achieve concurrently high sensitivity and specificity. Cost-effectiveness models of cervical cancer screening should use more conservative estimates of Pap test sensitivity.

Author and Article Information
space

From Duke University Medical Center and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Disclaimer: This article is based on an evidence report prepared by Duke University under contract with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ contract 290-97-0014). The authors are responsible for its content, including any clinical or treatment recommendations. No statement in this article should be construed as an official position of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Jean Slutsky of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality for overall project guidance, Jane Kolimaga for organization and management of the project, Ruth Goslin and Rebecca Gray for assistance with manuscript preparation, and the Advisory Panel and peer reviewers of the Evidence Report for many helpful suggestions throughout the entire process.

Grant Support: Dr. Nanda was a Veterans Affairs Women's Health Fellow at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center while conducting this study.

Requests for Single Reprints: Kavita Nanda, MD, MHS, Clinical Research Department, Family Health International, Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709; e-mail, knanda{at}fhi.org.

Requests To Purchase Bulk Reprints (minimum, 100 copies): the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Nanda: Clinical Research Department, Family Health International, Box 13950, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.

Drs. McCrory and Matchar: Center for Clinical Health Policy Research, Duke University Medical Center, First Union Tower, 2200 West Main Street, Suite 230, Durham, NC 27705.

Dr. Myers: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Box 3279 Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Dr. Bastian: Health Services Research and Development (152), Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC 27705.

Dr. Hasselblad: Department of Community and Family Medicine, Box 3850 Medical Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.

Mr. Hickey: School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
A. G. Siebers, P. J.J.M. Klinkhamer, M. Arbyn, A. O. Raifu, L. F.A.G. Massuger, and J. Bulten
Cytologic Detection of Cervical Abnormalities Using Liquid-Based Compared With Conventional Cytology: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Obstet. Gynecol., December 1, 2008; 112(6): 1327 - 1334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
N. K. Stout, J. D. Goldhaber-Fiebert, J. D. Ortendahl, and S. J. Goldie
Trade-offs in Cervical Cancer Prevention: Balancing Benefits and Risks
Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2008; 168(17): 1881 - 1889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
P. V. Chin-Hong, J. M. Berry, S.-C. Cheng, J. A. Catania, M. D. Costa, T. M. Darragh, F. Fishman, N. Jay, L. M. Pollack, and J. M. Palefsky
Comparison of Patient- and Clinician-Collected Anal Cytology Samples to Screen for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Anal Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Men Who Have Sex with Men
Ann Intern Med, September 2, 2008; 149(5): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
M. M. Blatter and B. J. Monk
The Pediatrician's Role in Preventing Cervical Cancer
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 2008; 47(7): 627 - 638.
[PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Jit, Y. H. Choi, and W J. Edmunds
Economic evaluation of human papillomavirus vaccination in the United Kingdom
BMJ, July 17, 2008; 337(jul17_2): a769 - a769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J STD AIDSHome page
J. Monsonego, G. Pollini, M. J. Evrard, P. Sednaoui, L. Monfort, D. Quinzat, R. Dachez, and K. Syrjanen
Linear array genotyping and hybrid capture II assay in detecting human papillomavirus genotypes in women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal Papanicolaou smear
Int J STD AIDS, June 1, 2008; 19(6): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
E. L Franco
Human Papillomavirus and Cervical Cancer: Integrating the New Prevention Strategies
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 12, 2008; 2008(1): 367 - 373.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
C. D. Runowicz
Molecular Screening for Cervical Cancer -- Time to Give up Pap Tests?
N. Engl. J. Med., October 18, 2007; 357(16): 1650 - 1653.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. J. Kim, K. M. Kuntz, N. K. Stout, S. Mahmud, L. L. Villa, E. L. Franco, and S. J. Goldie
Multiparameter Calibration of a Natural History Model of Cervical Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2007; 166(2): 137 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
G. Ronco, J. Cuzick, P. Pierotti, M. P. Cariaggi, P. D. Palma, C. Naldoni, B. Ghiringhello, P. Giorgi-Rossi, D. Minucci, F. Parisio, et al.
Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
BMJ, July 7, 2007; 335(7609): 28 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. J. Franzmann, E. P. Reategui, F. Pedroso, F. G. Pernas, B. M. Karakullukcu, K. L. Carraway, K. Hamilton, R. Singal, and W. J. Goodwin
Soluble CD44 Is a Potential Marker for the Early Detection of Head and Neck Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., July 1, 2007; 16(7): 1348 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
G. W. Bock and B. M. Kwan
Encouragement of Patient Self-management and Adherence through Use of a Computerized Tracking System for Cervical and Colon Cancer Screening
J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2007; 20(3): 316 - 319.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
N. Van de Velde, M. Brisson, and M.-C. Boily
Modeling Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Effectiveness: Quantifying the Impact of Parameter Uncertainty
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2007; 165(7): 762 - 775.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Steinau, M. S. Rajeevan, D. R. Lee, M. T. Ruffin, I. R. Horowitz, L. C. Flowers, T. Tadros, G. Birdsong, M. Husain, D. C. Kmak, et al.
Evaluation of RNA Markers for Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia in Exfoliated Cervical Cells
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2007; 16(2): 295 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
D. Saslow, P. E. Castle, J. T. Cox, D. D. Davey, M. H. Einstein, D. G. Ferris, S. J. Goldie, D. M. Harper, W. Kinney, A.-B. Moscicki, et al.
American Cancer Society Guideline for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Use to Prevent Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors
CA Cancer J Clin, January 1, 2007; 57(1): 7 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Kjaer, E. Hogdall, K. Frederiksen, C. Munk, A. van den Brule, E. Svare, C. Meijer, A. Lorincz, and T. Iftner
The Absolute Risk of Cervical Abnormalities in High-risk Human Papillomavirus-Positive, Cytologically Normal Women Over a 10-Year Period
Cancer Res., November 1, 2006; 66(21): 10630 - 10636.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. L. Kulasingam, E. R. Myers, H. W. Lawson, K. J. McConnell, K. Kerlikowske, J. Melnikow, A. E. Washington, and G. F. Sawaya
Cost-effectiveness of Extending Cervical Cancer Screening Intervals Among Women With Prior Normal Pap Tests
Obstet. Gynecol., February 1, 2006; 107(2): 321 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
R. Legood, A. Gray, J. Wolstenholme, and S. Moss
Lifetime effects, costs, and cost effectiveness of testing for human papillomavirus to manage low grade cytological abnormalities: results of the NHS pilot studies
BMJ, January 14, 2006; 332(7533): 79 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
J A Kahn, D I Bernstein, S L Rosenthal, B Huang, L M Kollar, J L Colyer, A M Tissot, P A Hillard, D Witte, P Groen, et al.
Acceptability of human papillomavirus self testing in female adolescents
Sex Transm Inf, October 1, 2005; 81(5): 408 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Sex. Transm. Infect.Home page
G S Ogilvie, D M Patrick, M Schulzer, J W Sellors, M Petric, K Chambers, R White, and J M FitzGerald
Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis
Sex Transm Inf, June 1, 2005; 81(3): 207 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. G. Harris, R. D. Burk, J. M. Palefsky, L. S. Massad, J. Y. Bang, K. Anastos, H. Minkoff, C. B. Hall, M. C. Bacon, A. M. Levine, et al.
Incidence of Cervical Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Associated With HIV Serostatus, CD4 Cell Counts, and Human Papillomavirus Test Results
JAMA, March 23, 2005; 293(12): 1471 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
E. J. Franzmann, E. P. Reategui, K. L. Carraway, K. L. Hamilton, D. T. Weed, and W. J. Goodwin
Salivary Soluble CD44: A Potential Molecular Marker for Head and Neck Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2005; 14(3): 735 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CA Cancer J ClinHome page
R. Anhang, A. Goodman, and S. J. Goldie
HPV Communication: Review of Existing Research and Recommendations for Patient Education
CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2004; 54(5): 248 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
S.-M. Kulmala, S. Syrjanen, I. Shabalova, N. Petrovichev, V. Kozachenko, J. Podistov, O. Ivanchenko, S. Zakharenko, R. Nerovjna, L. Kljukina, et al.
Human Papillomavirus Testing with the Hybrid Capture 2 Assay and PCR as Screening Tools
J. Clin. Microbiol., June 1, 2004; 42(6): 2470 - 2475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
J. A. Kahn
Self-testing for human papillomavirus using a vaginal swab: placing prevention of cervical cancer in the patient's hands
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2004; 15(6): 847 - 849.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Widschwendter, C. Gattringer, L. Ivarsson, H. Fiegl, A. Schneitter, A. Ramoni, H. M. Muller, A. Wiedemair, S. Jerabek, E. Muller-Holzner, et al.
Analysis of Aberrant DNA Methylation and Human Papillomavirus DNA in Cervicovaginal Specimens to Detect Invasive Cervical Cancer and Its Precursors
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3396 - 3400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. J. Goldie, M. Kohli, D. Grima, M. C. Weinstein, T. C. Wright, F. X. Bosch, and E. Franco
Projected Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness of a Human Papillomavirus 16/18 Vaccine
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 21, 2004; 96(8): 604 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
S. J. Goldie, J. J. Kim, and T. C. Wright
Cost-Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening in Women Aged 30 Years or More
Obstet. Gynecol., April 1, 2004; 103(4): 619 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. F. Sawaya, K. J. McConnell, S. L. Kulasingam, H. W. Lawson, K. Kerlikowske, J. Melnikow, N. C. Lee, G. Gildengorin, E. R. Myers, and A. E. Washington
Risk of Cervical Cancer Associated with Extending the Interval between Cervical-Cancer Screenings
N. Engl. J. Med., October 16, 2003; 349(16): 1501 - 1509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Ferreccio, M. C. Bratti, M. E. Sherman, R. Herrero, S. Wacholder, A. Hildesheim, R. D. Burk, M. Hutchinson, M. Alfaro, M. D. Greenberg, et al.
A Comparison of Single and Combined Visual, Cytologic, and Virologic Tests as Screening Strategies in a Region at High Risk of Cervical Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2003; 12(9): 815 - 823.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. L. Kulasingam and E. R. Myers
Potential Health and Economic Impact of Adding a Human Papillomavirus Vaccine to Screening Programs
JAMA, August 13, 2003; 290(6): 781 - 789.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
R.B. Lipton, D. Dodick, R. Sadovsky, K. Kolodner, J. Endicott, J. Hettiarachchi, and W. Harrison
A self-administered screener for migraine in primary care: The ID MigraineTM validation study
Neurology, August 12, 2003; 61(3): 375 - 382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
T. C. Wright Jr.
Chapter 10: Cervical Cancer Screening Using Visualization Techniques
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, June 1, 2003; 2003(31): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. E. Sherman
Chapter 11: Future Directions in Cervical Pathology
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, June 1, 2003; 2003(31): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
E. L. Franco
Chapter 13: Primary Screening of Cervical Cancer With Human Papillomavirus Tests
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, June 1, 2003; 2003(31): 89 - 96.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. J. F. Belch, E. J. Topol, G. Agnelli, M. Bertrand, R. M. Califf, D. L. Clement, M. A. Creager, J. D. Easton, J. R. Gavin III, P. Greenland, et al.
Critical Issues in Peripheral Arterial Disease Detection and Management: A Call to Action
Arch Intern Med, April 28, 2003; 163(8): 884 - 892.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Coste, B. Cochand-Priollet, P. de Cremoux, C. Le Gales, I. Cartier, V. Molinie, S. Labbe, M.-C. Vacher-Lavenu, and P. Vielh
Cross sectional study of conventional cervical smear, monolayer cytology, and human papillomavirus DNA testing for cervical cancer screening
BMJ, April 5, 2003; 326(7392): 733 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. E. Sherman, S. S. Wang, R. Tarone, L. Rich, and M. Schiffman
Histopathologic Extent of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia 3 Lesions in the Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Triage Study: Implications for Subject Safety and Lead-time Bias
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2003; 12(4): 372 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. E. Sherman, A. T. Lorincz, D. R. Scott, S. Wacholder, P. E. Castle, A. G. Glass, I. Mielzynska-Lohnas, B. B. Rush, and M. Schiffman
Baseline Cytology, Human Papillomavirus Testing, and Risk for Cervical Neoplasia: A 10-Year Cohort Analysis
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 1, 2003; 95(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, W. F. Lawrence, L. Gaffikin, K. K. Limpahayom, P. Lumbiganon, S. Warakamin, J. King, B. Yi, P. Ringers, and P. D. Blumenthal
Costs and Benefits of Different Strategies to Screen for Cervical Cancer in Less-Developed Countries
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 2, 2002; 94(19): 1469 - 1483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
G. Larry Maxwell, J. W. Carlson, M. Ochoa, T. Krivak, G. S. Rose, and E. R. Myers
Costs and Effectiveness of Alternative Strategies for Cervical Cancer Screening in Military Beneficiaries
Obstet. Gynecol., October 1, 2002; 100(4): 740 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. S. Mandelblatt, W. F. Lawrence, S. M. Womack, D. Jacobson, B. Yi, Y.-t. Hwang, K. Gold, J. Barter, and K. Shah
Benefits and Costs of Using HPV Testing to Screen for Cervical Cancer
JAMA, May 8, 2002; 287(18): 2372 - 2381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. J. Kim, T. C. Wright, and S. J. Goldie
Cost-effectiveness of Alternative Triage Strategies for Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance
JAMA, May 8, 2002; 287(18): 2382 - 2390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. Howard, J. Sellors, and A. Lytwyn
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women presenting with external genital warts
Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 1, 2002; 166(5): 598 - 599.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
A. BARRATT
Making the most of Pap tests
J Epidemiol Community Health, November 1, 2001; 55(11): 774 - 775.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
E. L. Franco, E. Duarte-Franco, and A. Ferenczy
The merits of new alternatives to the Papanicolaou test
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 1, 2001; 165(6): 739 - 740.
[Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. J. Goldie, L. Kuhn, L. Denny, A. Pollack, and T. C. Wright
Policy Analysis of Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies in Low-Resource Settings: Clinical Benefits and Cost-effectiveness
JAMA, June 27, 2001; 285(24): 3107 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. F. Sawaya, A. D. Brown, A. E. Washington, and A. M. Garber
Current Approaches to Cervical-Cancer Screening
N. Engl. J. Med., May 24, 2001; 344(21): 1603 - 1607.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Obstet GynecolHome page
E. R. MYERS, D. C. MCCRORY, S. SUBRAMANIAN, N. MCCALL, K. NANDA, S. DATTA, and D. B. MATCHAR
Setting the Target for a Better Cervical Screening Test: Characteristics of a Cost-Effective Test for Cervical Neoplasia Screening
Obstet. Gynecol., November 1, 2000; 96(5): 645 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
Other articles noted
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2000; 3(4): 106 - 112.
[Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 2000 by the American College of Physicians.