Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike Add to Complore Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter
What's this?
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
 arrow  Hunink, M. G.M.
space
 arrow  Brady, T. J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ACADEMIA AND CLINIC

Noninvasive Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: Focusing the Development of New Diagnostic Technology

right arrow Maria G.M. Hunink, MD, PhD; Karen M. Kuntz, ScD; Kirsten E. Fleischmann, MD, MPH; and Thomas J. Brady, MD

2 November 1999 | Volume 131 Issue 9 | Pages 673-680

Background: New tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electron-beam computed tomography (CT), are being developed for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Objective: To determine the conditions that a new test must meet to be a cost-effective alternative to established imaging tests.

Design: Decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Data Sources: Literature review and meta-analysis.

Target Population: 55-year-old men and 65-year-old women presenting with chest pain.

Time Horizon: Lifetime of the patient.

Perspective: Health care policy.

Interventions: MRI, electron-beam CT, exercise echocardiography, exercise single-photon emission CT, and coronary angiography.

Outcome Measures: Target sensitivity and specificity values for a new noninvasive test.

Results of Base-Case Analysis: Assuming that society is willing to pay $75 000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, a new test that costs $1000 would need a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 90% to be cost-effective.

Results of Sensitivity Analysis: Assuming that society is willing to pay $50 000 per QALY gained, a new test that costs $1000 or more would never be cost-effective. For a test that costs $500, the sensitivity and specificity must each be 95%.

Conclusions: New imaging techniques, such as MRI and electron-beam CT, must be relatively inexpensive and have excellent sensitivity and specificity to be cost-effective compared with other techniques for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Similar analyses in other areas of health care may help to focus the development of new diagnostic technology.

Author and Article Information
space

From Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Harvard School of Public Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, San Francisco, California.

Acknowledgments: Dr. Hunink was supported in part by a Persoongerichte Impuls voor Onderzoeksgroepen met Nieuwe Ideëen voor Excellente Research (PIONIER 900-92-146) award from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Drs. Fleischmann and Kuntz were supported by a project grant from the American Society of Echocardiography. Dr. Fleischmann is the recipient of a Clinical Investigator Development Award (1K08HL02964-01) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Requests for Reprints: Maria G.M. Hunink, MD, PhD, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Room EE21-40a, Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands; e-mail, hunink{at}epib.fgg.eur.nl. For reprint orders in quantities exceeding 100, please contact the Reprints Coordinator; phone, 215-351-2657; e-mail, reprints{at}mail.acponline.org.

Current Author Addresses: Dr. Hunink: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Department of Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Room EE21-40a, Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Dr. Kuntz: Center for Risk Analysis, Harvard School of Public Health, 718 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115-5924.

Dr. Fleischmann: School of Medicine Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M 326, San Francisco, CA 94143-0214.

Dr. Brady: Center for Innovative Minimally Invasive Therapy, Partners Healthcare System, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, BAR 703, Boston, MA 02114-2696.

 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc Qual OutcomesHome page
G. A. Diamond and S. Kaul
Cost, Effectiveness, and Cost-Effectiveness
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes, January 1, 2009; 2(1): 49 - 54.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. J. Shaw, D. Polk, and C. N. Bairey Merz
Assessing Mature Technology: What Is the Effect of High-Quality Risk Stratification Evidence With Exercise Echocardiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 16, 2007; 49(2): 238 - 239.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. Gazelle, P. M. McMahon, U. Siebert, and M. T. Beinfeld
Cost-effectiveness Analysis in the Assessment of Diagnostic Imaging Technologies
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 361 - 370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. G. M. Hunink
Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty and Resource Constraints: Examples from Trauma Imaging
Radiology, May 1, 2005; 235(2): 375 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. J. Pennell, U. P. Sechtem, C. B. Higgins, W. J. Manning, G. M. Pohost, F. E. Rademakers, A. C. van Rossum, L. J. Shaw, and E. K. Yucel
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report
Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1940 - 1965.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Decis MakingHome page
F. Yokota and K. M. Thompson
Value of Information Literature Analysis: A Review of Applications in Health Risk Management
Med Decis Making, June 1, 2004; 24(3): 287 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. J. G. De Lima, E. Sabbaga, M. L. C. Vieira, F. J. de Paula, L. E. Ianhez, E. M. Krieger, and J. A. F. Ramires
Coronary Angiography Is the Best Predictor of Events in Renal Transplant Candidates Compared With Noninvasive Testing
Hypertension, September 1, 2003; 42(3): 263 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. B. Mark, L. J. Shaw, M. S. Lauer, P. G. O'Malley, and P. Heidenreich
Task force #5--is atherosclerosis imaging cost effective?
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 4, 2003; 41(11): 1906 - 1917.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Visser, M. C. J. M. Kock, K. M. Kuntz, M. C. Donaldson, G. S. Gazelle, and M. G. Myriam Hunink
Cost-effectiveness Targets for Multi-Detector Row CT Angiography in the Work-up of Patients with Intermittent Claudication
Radiology, June 1, 2003; 227(3): 647 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
G. S. R. Muradin and M. G. Myriam Hunink
Cost and Patency Rate Targets for the Development of Endovascular Devices to Treat Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Radiology, February 1, 2001; 218(2): 464 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Physicians.