Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article
space
 arrow  PDF of this article
(PDFs free after 6 months)
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Showstack, J.
space
  arrow  Weber, E.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Evaluating the Impact of Hospitalists

right arrow Jonathan Showstack, PhD, MPH; Patricia P. Katz, PhD; and Ellen Weber, MD

16 February 1999 | Volume 130 Issue 4 Part 2 | Pages 376-381

The hospital-based generalist physician is a recent organizational innovation in health care in the United States. Does the hospitalist model provide improved health care? The answer to this question lies in a rigorous evaluation of the hospitalist system in the clinical setting. This paper describes key outcomes that need to be assessed and methodologic issues that need to be addressed when conducting and interpreting the results of evaluations of the hospitalist model. To provide evidence about the value of the hospitalist model, quality of care should be evaluated through the measurement of both processes and outcomes. The clinical processes assessed may include diagnostic tests and treatments that are causally linked with outcomes. A variety of outcomes can be measured, such as death, clinical or physiologic status, physical function, and psychological well-being. The analysis of resource use data can aid in an assessment of the relative costs and effectiveness of clinical services. An evaluation of the hospitalist model requires an adequate research design, which should include a precise definition of the model being studied, the selection of an appropriate comparison group, the collection of clinical and demographic information on patients, the specification of both process and outcome measures, and the use of statistical techniques that are appropriate to the questions being asked and the data being collected. The design must distinguish between outcomes attributable to the introduction of hospitalists and those attributable to other changes in medical treatments and the organization of care.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled " The Hospitalist Movement in the United States." To see a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents.

Requests for Reprints: Jonathan Showstack, PhD, Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0936; e-mail, jas1{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.

Current Author Addresses: Drs. Showstack and Katz: Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143.

Dr. Weber: Division of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Campus Box 0208, San Francisco, CA 94143-0208.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
P. S. Lye, D. A. Rauch, M. C. Ottolini, C. P. Landrigan, V. W. Chiang, R. Srivastava, S. Muret-Wagstaff, and S. Ludwig
Pediatric Hospitalists: Report of a Leadership Conference
Pediatrics, April 1, 2006; 117(4): 1122 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
J. Coffman and T. G. Rundall
The Impact of Hospitalists on the Cost and Quality of Inpatient Care in the United States: A Research Synthesis
Med Care Res Rev, August 1, 2005; 62(4): 379 - 406.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
A. D. Auerbach, R. M. Wachter, P. Katz, J. Showstack, R. B. Baron, and L. Goldman
Implementation of a Voluntary Hospitalist Service at a Community Teaching Hospital: Improved Clinical Efficiency and Patient Outcomes
Ann Intern Med, December 3, 2002; 137(11): 859 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. M. Wachter and L. Goldman
The Hospitalist Movement 5 Years Later
JAMA, January 23, 2002; 287(4): 487 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. M. Melzer, R. A. Molteni, E. K. Marcuse, and F. P. Rivara
Characteristics and Financial Performance of a Pediatric Faculty Inpatient Attending Service: A Resource-Based Relative Value Scale Analysis
Pediatrics, July 1, 2001; 108(1): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
D. Hackner, G. Tu, G. D. Braunstein, M. Ault, S. Weingarten, and Z. Mohsenifar
The Value of a Hospitalist Service : Efficient Care for the Aging Population?
Chest, February 1, 2001; 119(2): 580 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
H. A. Abenhaim, S. R. Kahn, J. Raffoul, and M. R. Becker
Program description: a hospitalist-run, medical short-stay unit in a teaching hospital
Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 1, 2000; 163(11): 1477 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1999 by the American College of Physicians.