|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 May 1999 | Volume 130 Issue 10 | Pages 848-856
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of various ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors for the diagnosis of arrhythmia-related disorders and to provide recommendations for their use in clinical practice.
Data Sources: Studies published since 1988 were identified through search of the MEDLINE database.
Study Selection: Studies that met methodologic criteria for minimal bias and had clinical relevance were selected.
Data Extraction: Descriptive and analytic data from each study.
Data Synthesis: Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors, specifically transtelephonic continuous-loop event recorders, are highly effective for establishing a diagnosis in patients with palpitations but are less effective for establishing a diagnosis in patients with syncope. Clinicians may use these devices to monitor for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in patients at potentially high risk for sudden arrhythmic death; however, few data are available to support this practice. Ambulatory monitors are useful for assessment of the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic medications and the recurrence of symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias. New ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring devices are being developed that may facilitate outpatient management of chronic cardiac disease.
Conclusions: Ambulatory electrocardiographic monitors, particularly transtelephonic continuous-loop event recorders, aid in the diagnosis of symptomatic arrhythmias. These devices are also useful for monitoring the effectiveness and safety of antiarrhythmic medications. Guidelines are lacking for use of these devices to assess prognosis in patients at potential risk for sudden arrhythmic death.
Author and Article Information
From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Requests for Reprints: Peter J. Zimetbaum, MD, Cardiovascular Division (GZ-435), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail, pzimetba{at}Caregroup.harvard.edu.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Zimetbaum and Josephson: Cardiovascular Division (GZ-435), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215. REVIEW
The Evolving Role of Ambulatory Arrhythmia Monitoring in General Clinical Practice
![]()
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H Pass and L. Liberman The implantable loop recorder in children: searching for indications Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 832 - 833. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices) Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 27, 2008; 51(21): e1 - e62. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. E. Epstein, J. P. DiMarco, K. A. Ellenbogen, N.A. M. Estes III, R. A. Freedman, L. S. Gettes, A. M. Gillinov, G. Gregoratos, S. C. Hammill, D. L. Hayes, et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices): Developed in Collaboration With the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons Circulation, May 27, 2008; 117(21): e350 - e408. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Enseleit and F. Duru Long-term continuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. Europace, April 1, 2006; 8(4): 255 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Hoefman, H. C. van Weert, J. B Reitsma, R. W Koster, and P. J. Bindels Diagnostic yield of patient-activated loop recorders for detecting heart rhythm abnormalities in general practice: a randomised clinical trial Fam. Pract., October 1, 2005; 22(5): 478 - 484. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Carlson, J. Ip, J. Messenger, S. Beau, S. Kalbfleisch, P. Gervais, D. A. Cameron, A. Duran, J. Val-Mejias, J. Mackall, et al. A new pacemaker algorithm for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: Results of the Atrial Dynamic Overdrive Pacing Trial (ADOPT) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 20, 2003; 42(4): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J R Gimbel Novel use of an "insertable" loop recorder Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): e18 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N Summerton, S Mann, A Rigby, S Petkar, and J Dhawan New-onset palpitations in general practice: assessing the discriminant value of items within the clinical history Fam. Pract., August 1, 2001; 18(4): 383 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Mangrum and J. P. DiMarco The Evaluation and Management of Bradycardia N. Engl. J. Med., March 9, 2000; 342(10): 703 - 709. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||