 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 September 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 6 | Pages 495-500
A critical mass of Internet users will soon enable wide diffusion of electronic communication within medical practice.E-mail between physicians and patients offers important opportunities for better communication. Linking patients and physicians through e-mail may increase the involvement of patients in supervising and documenting their own health care, processes that may activate patients and contribute to improved health. These new linkages may have profound implications for the patient–physician relationship. Although the federal government proposes regulation of telemedicine technologies and medical software, communications technologies are evolving under less scrutiny. Unless these technologies are implemented with substantial forethought, they may disturb delicate balances in the patient–physician relationship, widen social disparities in health outcomes, and create barriers to access to health care.
This paper seeks to identify the promise and pitfalls of electronic patient–physician communication before such technology becomes widely distributed. A research agenda is proposed that would provide data that are useful for careful shaping of the communications infrastructure. The paper addresses the need to 1) define appropriate use of the various modes of patient–physician communication, 2) ensure the security and confidentiality of patient information, 3) create user interfaces that guide patients in effective use of the technology, 4) proactively assess medicolegal liability, and 5) ensure access to the technology by a multicultural, multilingual population with varying degrees of literacy.
Author and Article Information
From Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES
Electronic Patient-Physician Communication: Problems and Promise
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Dr. Peter Szolovits for inspiring them to explore electronic physician-patient communication and Alison Clapp, librarian at Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, for help in conducting the literature review.
Requests for Reprints: Kenneth D. Mandl, MD, MPH, Division of Emergency Medicine, MA-001, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Mandl: Division of Emergency Medicine, MA-001, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Stalberg, M. Yeh, G. Ketteridge, H. Delbridge, and L. Delbridge E-mail Access and Improved Communication Between Patient and Surgeon Arch Surg, February 1, 2008; 143(2): 164 - 168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. D. Halamka, K. D. Mandl, and P. C. Tang Early Experiences with Personal Health Records J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., January 1, 2008; 15(1): 1 - 7. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L. Leong, D. Gingrich, P. R. Lewis, D. T. Mauger, and J. H. George Enhancing Doctor-Patient Communication Using Email: A Pilot Study J Am Board Fam Med, May 1, 2005; 18(3): 180 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. G. Anand, M. J. Feldman, D. S. Geller, A. Bisbee, and H. Bauchner A Content Analysis of E-mail Communication Between Primary Care Providers and Parents Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1283 - 1288. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Hsu, J. Huang, J. Kinsman, B. Fireman, R. Miller, J. Selby, and E. Ortiz Use of e-Health Services between 1999 and 2002: A Growing Digital Divide J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., March 1, 2005; 12(2): 164 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. V. Slack A 67-Year-Old Man Who e-Mails His Physician JAMA, November 10, 2004; 292(18): 2255 - 2261. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Car and A. Sheikh Email consultations in health care: 2--acceptability and safe application BMJ, August 21, 2004; 329(7463): 439 - 442. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. R Jadad, C. A Rizo, and M. W Enkin I am a good patient, believe it or not BMJ, June 12, 2003; 326(7402): 1293 - 1295. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. M. Liederman and C. S. Morefield Web Messaging: A New Tool for Patient-Physician Communication J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., May 1, 2003; 10(3): 260 - 270. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R Al-Shahi, M Sadler, G Rees, and D Bateman The internet J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2002; 73(6): 619 - 628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. D. Kleiner, R. Akers, B. L. Burke, and E. J. Werner Parent and Physician Attitudes Regarding Electronic Communication in Pediatric Practices Pediatrics, May 1, 2002; 109(5): 740 - 744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. D Mandl, P. Szolovits, I. S Kohane, D. Markwell, and R. MacDonald Public standards and patients' control: how to keep electronic medical records accessible but private Commentary: Open approaches to electronic patient records Commentary: A patient's viewpoint BMJ, February 3, 2001; 322(7281): 283 - 287. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Demartines, U. Otto, D. Mutter, L. Labler, A. von Weymarn, M. Vix, and F. Harder An Evaluation of Telemedicine in Surgery: Telediagnosis Compared With Direct Diagnosis Arch Surg, July 1, 2000; 135(7): 849 - 853. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. D. Mandl, S. Feit, B. M. G. Pena, and I. S. Kohane Growth and Determinants of Access in Patient E-mail and Internet Use Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, May 1, 2000; 154(5): 508 - 511. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H.C. G. Wong Electronic Patient-Physician Communication Ann Intern Med, June 1, 1999; 130(11): 944 - 944. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. W. Strode, S. Gustke, and A. Allen Technical and Clinical Progress in Telemedicine JAMA, March 24, 1999; 281(12): 1066 - 1068. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Article
