Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Siegel, M.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

PERSPECTIVE

Mass Media Antismoking Campaigns: A Powerful Tool for Health Promotion

Michael Siegel, MD, MPH

15 July 1998 | Volume 129 Issue 2 | Pages 128-132

Cigarette advertising and promotion have been shown to influence smoking in young persons, but the powerful effect of the mass media on behavior can also be used to promote health.Several states have earmarked a portion of their cigarette excise tax revenues to fund mass media antismoking campaigns, which have been effective in reducing cigarette consumption and in helping persons quit smoking. Despite their successes, the campaigns have been hindered by tobacco industry-supported attempts to cut their funding or restrict their scope. The most aggressive campaigns, which attack the tobacco industry and challenge social norms about tobacco use and promotion, are the most controversial but also the most effective. Mass media antismoking campaigns are a promising tool for health promotion, but only if sustained funding can be guaranteed and the development of the advertisements can be protected from intrusion by political forces.

Author and Article Information

From Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Requests for Reprints: Michael Siegel, MD, MPH, Boston University School of Public Health, Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, 715 Albany Street, TW2, Boston, MA 02118.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Hyland, M Wakefield, C. Higbee, G Szczypka, and K. Cummings Anti-tobacco television advertising and indicators of smoking cessation in adults: a cohort study Health Educ. Res., July 1, 2006; 21(3): 348 - 354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Hyland, M Wakefield, C. Higbee, G Szczypka, and K. Cummings Anti-tobacco television advertising and indicators of smoking cessation in adults: a cohort study Health Educ. Res., April 1, 2006; 21(2): 296 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. W. Helme, R. Borland, W. Young, C. Nycum, and D. B. Buller The Development and Validation of a Coding Protocol to Measure Change in Tobacco-Control Newspaper Coverage Health Promot Pract, January 1, 2006; 7(1): 103 - 109. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Lewis, D Arnott, C Godfrey, and J Britton Public health measures to reduce smoking prevalence in the UK: how many lives could be saved? Tob. Control, August 1, 2005; 14(4): 251 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Siegel Food and Drug Administration regulation of tobacco: snatching defeat from the jaws of victory Tob. Control, December 1, 2004; 13(4): 439 - 441. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bayer, L. O. Gostin, G. H. Javitt, and A. Brandt Tobacco Advertising in the United States: A Proposal for a Constitutionally Acceptable Form of Regulation JAMA, June 12, 2002; 287(22): 2990 - 2995. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L Biener Anti-tobacco advertisements by Massachusetts and Philip Morris: what teenagers think Tob. Control, June 1, 2002; 11(90002): ii43 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				L. Biener, G. McCallum-Keeler, and A. L Nyman Adults' response to Massachusetts anti-tobacco television advertisements: impact of viewer and advertisement characteristics Tob. Control, December 1, 2000; 9(4): 401 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				K. Lasser, J. W. Boyd, S. Woolhandler, D. U. Himmelstein, D. McCormick, and D. H. Bor Smoking and Mental Illness: A Population-Based Prevalence Study JAMA, November 22, 2000; 284(20): 2606 - 2610. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]