Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Crenner, C. W.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

HISTORY OF MEDICINE

Introduction of the Blood Pressure Cuff into U.S. Medical Practice: Technology and Skilled Practice

right arrow Christopher W. Crenner, MD, PhD

15 March 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 6 | Pages 488-493

The history of the sphygmomanometer, or blood pressure cuff, raises useful questions about the acceptance of new medical technologies.When the blood pressure cuff first appeared in U.S. medical practice in the first decade of the 1900s, it generated some concern and debate among physicians. Review of the medical literature, a systematic study of patient records from Massachusetts General Hospital, and consideration of events in Boston during this period suggest that physicians faced several important choices associated with the early acceptance of the cuff.

The introduction of the blood pressure cuff presented physicians with several different, competing methods for assessing the force of a patient's blood flow.Physicians chose to use the cuff in a manner that preserved their exclusive use of the new tool and maintained a high level of skill for their individual practices. An early proposal to introduce the new blood pressure cuff as a simple tool for nursing use met with resistance. Many physicians initially favored a competing practice of assessing the force of blood flow by pulse palpation. Physicians eventually dropped the practice of subjectively palpating the force of blood flow and came to rely increasingly on the measurement of blood pressure using auscultation. Even after adopting the cuff into practice, however, they had little interest in completely standardizing the use of the blood pressure cuff across the practices of individual physicians.

Author and Article Information
space

From Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; and Manchester Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Manchester, New Hampshire. For the current author address, see end of text.
Acknowledgments: The author thanks the staff in the Department of Medical Records at Massachusetts General Hospital for their assistance.
Grant Support: In part by a Mellon Foundation Dissertation Support Grant in the Humanities.
Requests for Reprints: Christopher W. Crenner, MD, Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
S. Trzeciak and M. E. Chansky
"Vital" sign?
Chest, October 1, 2006; 130(4): 933 - 934.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
T. L. Petty
John Hutchinson's Mysterious Machine Revisited*
Chest, May 1, 2002; 121(5_suppl): 219S - 223S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
F. Davidoff and V. Florance
The Informationist: A New Health Profession?
Ann Intern Med, June 20, 2000; 132(12): 996 - 998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. A. Yarows, S. Julius, and T. G. Pickering
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
Arch Intern Med, May 8, 2000; 160(9): 1251 - 1257.
[Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Physicians.