Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Stock, J. L.
space
  arrow  Morris, M. A.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Clinical Reporting to Primary Care Physicians Leads to Increased Use and Understanding of Bone Densitometry and Affects the Management of Osteoporosis

A Randomized Trial

right arrow John L. Stock, MD; Catherine E. Waud, MD; James A. Coderre, MS; Judith H. Overdorf, RN, MPH; John S. Janikas, BS; Kathleen M. Heiniluoma; and M. Anne Morris, BS

15 June 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 12 Part 1 | Pages 996-999

Background: A major barrier to wider use of bone densitometry has been a lack of reports that are comprehensible to primary care physicians.

Objective: To compare the effect of short technical reports and longer clinical reports on use, understanding, and acceptance of bone densitometry by primary care physicians and on management of osteoporosis.

Design: Randomized trial.

Setting: Osteoporosis center of a community teaching hospital.

Subjects: 57 primary care physicians ordering bone mineral density tests with dual x-ray absorptiometry.

Intervention: Physicians were randomly assigned to receive short technical reports or long clinical reports written by endocrinologists with access to clinical information.

Measurements: Physicians were interviewed by telephone after receiving at least two reports.

Results: Before being interviewed, physicians receiving short reports ordered a mean ±SD of 0.72 ± 0.71 tests per month; those receiving long reports ordered 1.30 ± 1.21 tests per month (P = 0.002). At the first interview, 30% of physicians receiving short reports and 86% of those receiving long reports understood the bone mineral density definition of osteoporosis (P < 0.001). Receiving long reports led to more modifications in the pharmacologic treatment of osteoporosis by gynecologists (19% of patients whose reports were short and 61% of patients whose reports were long; P = 0.021) and less confusion about reports by all physicians (36% of physicians receiving short reports and 1% of those receiving long reports; P = 0.003).

Conclusions: Clinical reporting of bone densitometry to primary care physicians increased use and understanding of bone densitometry, changed management of osteoporosis, and was well accepted. It may help achieve appropriate use of bone densitometry and may allow convenient dissemination of information on osteoporosis.

Author and Article Information
space

From the Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, and University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the primary care physicians for their participation and Carol Gaylord for secretarial support.
Grant Support: In part by a grant from the Roger Robinson Fund, UMass Memorial Health Care.
Requests for Reprints: John L. Stock, MD, Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Stock and Waud and Mr. Coderre, Ms. Overdorf, Mr. Janikas, Ms. Heiniluoma, and Ms. Morris: Osteoporosis Research and Treatment Center, UMass Memorial Health Care, 119 Belmont Street, Worcester, MA 01605.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
K. Kawamoto, C. A Houlihan, E A. Balas, and D. F Lobach
Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success
BMJ, April 2, 2005; 330(7494): 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. C. Lentle and J. C. Prior
Osteoporosis: What a Clinician Expects to Learn from a Patient's Bone Density Examination
Radiology, September 1, 2003; 228(3): 620 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. W. Bates, D. M. Black, and S. R. Cummings
Clinical Use of Bone Densitometry: Clinical Applications
JAMA, October 16, 2002; 288(15): 1898 - 1900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
H. D. Nelson, M. Helfand, S. H. Woolf, and J. D. Allan
Screening for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, September 17, 2002; 137(6): 529 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1998 by the American College of Physicians.