Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 June 1998 | Volume 128 Issue 12 Part 1 | Pages 965-974
Background: Empirical scores, computerized ST-segment measurements, and equations have been proposed as tools for improving the diagnostic performance of the exercise test.
Objective: To compare the diagnostic utility of these scores, measurements, and equations with that of visual ST-segment measurements in patients with reduced workup bias.
Design: Prospective analysis.
Setting: 12 university-affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Centers.
Patients: 814 consecutive patients who presented with angina pectoris and agreed to undergo both exercise testing and coronary angiography.
Measurements: Digital electrocardiographic recorders and angiographic calipers were used for testing at each site, and test results were sent to core laboratories.
Results: Although 25% of patients had previously had testing, workup bias was reduced, as shown by comparison with a pilot study group. This reduction resulted in a sensitivity of 45% and a specificity of 85% for visual analysis. Computerized measurements and visual analysis had similar diagnostic power. Equations incorporating nonelectrocardiographic variables and either visual or computerized ST-segment measurement had similar discrimination and were superior to single ST-segment measurements. These equations correctly classified 5 more patients of every 100 tested (areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve, 0.80 for equations and 0.68 for visual analysis; P < 0.001) in this population with a 50% prevalence of disease.
Conclusions: Standard exercise tests had lower sensitivity but higher specificity in this population with reduced work-up bias than in previous studies. Computerized ST-segment measurements were similar to visual ST-segment measurements made by cardiologists. Considering more than ST-segment measurements can enhance the diagnostic power of the exercise test.
*For members of the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study in Health Services #016 (QUEXTA) Study Group, see Appendix 2.
ARTICLE
The Electrocardiographic Exercise Test in a Population with Reduced Workup Bias: Diagnostic Performance, Computerized Interpretation, and Multivariable Prediction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Lauer, S. C. Murthy, E. H. Blackstone, I. C. Okereke, and T. W. Rice [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Uptake by Positron Emission Tomography for Diagnosis of Suspected Lung Cancer: Impact of Verification Bias Arch Intern Med, January 22, 2007; 167(2): 161 - 165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kligfield and M. S. Lauer Exercise Electrocardiogram Testing: Beyond the ST Segment Circulation, November 7, 2006; 114(19): 2070 - 2082. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R. Albers, M. Z. Krichavsky, and G. J. Balady Stress Testing in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value Circulation, January 31, 2006; 113(4): 583 - 592. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, H. M. Krumholz, M. E. Clouse, J. Chen, and H. M. Krumholz Noninvasive Screening for Coronary Artery Disease With Computed Tomography Is Useful Circulation, January 3, 2006; 113(1): 125 - 146. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Lauer, E. S. Froelicher, M. Williams, and P. Kligfield Exercise Testing in Asymptomatic Adults: A Statement for Professionals From the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Circulation, August 2, 2005; 112(5): 771 - 776. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Foote, J. D. Pearlman, A. H. Siegel, and K.-T. J. Yeo Detection of exercise-induced ischemia by changes in B-type natriuretic peptides J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 16, 2004; 44(10): 1980 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Aktas, V. Ozduran, C. E. Pothier, R. Lang, and M. S. Lauer Global Risk Scores and Exercise Testing for Predicting All-Cause Mortality in a Preventive Medicine Program JAMA, September 22, 2004; 292(12): 1462 - 1468. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. H. Blackstone and M. S. Lauer Caveat emptor: The treachery of work-up bias J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2004; 128(3): 341 - 344. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Whiting, A. W.S. Rutjes, J. B. Reitsma, A. S. Glas, P. M.M. Bossuyt, and J. Kleijnen Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2004; 140(3): 189 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Punglia, A. V. D'Amico, W. J. Catalona, K. A. Roehl, and K. M. Kuntz Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen N. Engl. J. Med., July 24, 2003; 349(4): 335 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P Schmid Detection of exercise induced ischaemia: a new role for cardiopulmonary exercise testing Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2003; 24(14): 1285 - 1286. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Lanza, A. Sestito, S. Iacovella, L. Morlacchi, E. Romagnoli, G. Schiavoni, F. Crea, A. Maseri, and F. Andreotti Relation Between Platelet Response to Exercise and Coronary Angiographic Findings in Patients With Effort Angina Circulation, March 18, 2003; 107(10): 1378 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Committee Members, R. J. Gibbons, G. J. Balady, J. Timothy Bricker, B. R. Chaitman, G. F. Fletcher, V. F. Froelicher, D. B. Mark, B. D. McCallister, A. N. Mooss, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for exercise testing: summary article: A report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to update the 1997 exercise testing guidelines) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1531 - 1540. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, G. J. Balady, J. Timothy Bricker, B. R. Chaitman, G. F. Fletcher, V. F. Froelicher, D. B. Mark, B. D. McCallister, A. N. Mooss, M. G. O'Reilly, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for Exercise Testing: Summary Article: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1997 Exercise Testing Guidelines) Circulation, October 1, 2002; 106(14): 1883 - 1892. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. V. Williams, S. D. Fihn, and R. J. Gibbons Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina: Diagnosis and Risk Stratification Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2001; 135(7): 530 - 547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. deFilippi, S. Rosanio, M. Tocchi, R. J. Parmar, M. A. Potter, B. F. Uretsky, and M. S. Runge Randomized comparison of a strategy of predischarge coronary angiography versus exercise testing in low-risk patients in a chest pain unit: in-hospital and long-term outcomes J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2042 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. H. Stewart, J. Kittelson, and I. P. Kay Statistical methods to improve the precision of the treadmill exercise test J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 2000; 36(4): 1274 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. O'Rourke, B. H. Brundage, V. F. Froelicher, P. Greenland, S. M. Grundy, R. Hachamovitch, G. M. Pohost, L. J. Shaw, W. S. Weintraub, W. L. Winters Jr, et al. American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 2000; 36(1): 326 - 340. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Gibbons, K. Chatterjee, J. Daley, J. S. Douglas, S. D. Fihn, J. M. Gardin, M. A. Grunwald, D. Levy, B. W. Lytle, R. A. O'Rourke, et al. ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM guidelines for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 1999; 33(7): 2092 - 2197. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||