 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 October 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 8 Part 2 | Pages 733-738
The Institute of Medicine defines health care quality as increasing "the likelihood of desired health outcomes" using "services ... consistent with current professional knowledge." This definition implies that quality measures can be based on either achieving health care outcomes or completing processes that experts agree have been shown by scientific evidence to improve outcomes. Process-based measures are especially suitable when the user needs to know how to improve quality, when provider comparisons show equivalent outcomes but all providers should improve processes, when measures are needed to evaluate health care that is intended to improve long-term outcomes, or when the contribution of individual providers (especially providers who have a small number of cases) needs to be defined. However, many different process-based measures are needed to comprehensively assess quality, and many process-based measures require detailed clinical data currently found only in medical records. Therefore, the expense of abstracting records is a barrier to process-based measurement. Fortunately, large-scale process-based measures are becoming more feasible because the required clinical data are being included in large databases. The merging of existing inpatient and outpatient databases with pharmacy and laboratory databases is an important step toward obtaining data that link all patient admissions, appointments, diagnostic procedures, and prescriptions with diagnoses and test results. Other data that are valuable for process-based measures must still be obtained by abstracting data from records, including clinical findings, patient preferences, and medical and family history. In the future, such data may be added to large databases to create computerized medical records.
Author and Article Information
From the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
QUALITY MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT
Process-Based Measures of Quality: The Need for Detailed Clinical Data in Large Health Care Databases
Note: This article is one of a series of articles comprising an Annals of Internal Medicine supplement entitled "Measuring Quality, Outcomes, and Cost of Care Using Large Databases: The Sixth Regenstrief Conference." To see a complete list of the articles included in this supplement, please view its Table of Contents.
Acknowledgments: The author thanks Frederic Wolinsky, PhD, and participants of the Sixth Regenstrief Conference for their helpful comments on this article.
Requests for Reprints: R. Heather Palmer, MB, BCh, SM, Center for Quality of Care Research and Education, Harvard School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S.M. Mourad, W.L.D.M. Nelen, R.P.M.G. Hermens, L.F. Bancsi, D.D.M. Braat, G.A. Zielhuis, R.P.T.M. Grol, and J.A.M. Kremer Variation in subfertility care measured by guideline-based performance indicators Hum. Reprod., July 24, 2008; (2008) den281v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. M. Werner and E. T. Bradlow Relationship Between Medicare's Hospital Compare Performance Measures and Mortality Rates JAMA, December 13, 2006; 296(22): 2694 - 2702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. E. Mayo, L. Poissant, S. Ahmed, L. Finch, J. Higgins, N. M. Salbach, J. Soicher, and S. Jaglal Incorporating the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) into an Electronic Health Record to Create Indicators of Function: Proof of Concept Using the SF-12 J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2004; 11(6): 514 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. C. Walter, N. P. Davidowitz, P. A. Heineken, and K. E. Covinsky Pitfalls of Converting Practice Guidelines Into Quality Measures: Lessons Learned From a VA Performance Measure JAMA, May 26, 2004; 291(20): 2466 - 2470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. N. Joish, D. C. Malone, C. Wendel, and M. J. Mohler Profiling Quality of Diabetes Care in a Veterans Mfairs Healthcare System American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 112 - 120. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. LAWTHERS, G. S. PRANSKY, L. E. PETERSON, and J. H. HIMMELSTEIN Rethinking quality in the context of persons with disability Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2003; 15(4): 287 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. R. Bowers and C. I. Kiefe Measuring Health Care Quality: Comparing and Contrasting the Medical and the Marketing Approaches American Journal of Medical Quality, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 136 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. C. Hermann and R. H. Palmer Common Ground: A Framework for Selecting Core Quality Measures for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Care Psychiatr Serv, March 1, 2002; 53(3): 281 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S M Campbell, J Braspenning, A Hutchinson, and M Marshall Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care Qual. Saf. Health Care, January 12, 2002; 11(4): 358 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. I. Kiefe, J. J. Allison, O. D. Williams, S. D. Person, M. T. Weaver, and N. W. Weissman Improving Quality Improvement Using Achievable Benchmarks For Physician Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA, June 13, 2001; 285(22): 2871 - 2879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. D. Huff, L. G. Sandy, K. G. Shojania, R. M. Wachter, J. E. Wennberg, T. P. Hofer, R. A. Hayward, S. Greenfield, S. H. Kaplan, E. H. Wagner, et al. Unreliability of Physician "Report Cards" to Assess Cost and Quality of Care JAMA, January 5, 2000; 283(1): 51 - 54. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
Article
