Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Patrick, D. L.
space
  arrow  Uhlmann, R. F.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

ARTICLE

Validation of Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatment: Implications for Advance Care Planning

right arrow Donald L. Patrick, PhD, MSPH; Robert A. Pearlman, MD, MPH; Helene E. Starks, MPH; Kevin C. Cain, PhD; William G. Cole, PhD; and Richard F. Uhlmann, MD, MPH

1 October 1997 | Volume 127 Issue 7 | Pages 509-517

Background: Treatment preferences established before life-threatening illness occurs may differ from actual decisions because of changes in preferences or poor understanding of the link between prospective preferences and outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the validity of prospective treatment preferences by examining their concordance with ratings of health states.

Design: Survey of seven cohorts of persons with diverse health status. Home- and hospital-based interviews were conducted at baseline and at 6, 18, and 30 months.

Setting: The greater Seattle area.

Participants: Younger and older well adults; persons with chronic conditions, terminal cancer, or AIDS; stroke survivors; and nursing home residents.

Measurements: Concordance between six treatment preferences and five health state ratings (on a seven-point scale) was assessed by using logistic regression to measure the increase in odds of treatment refusal for each one-point change in health state ratings. Preferences were considered concordant if treatments were refused in health states rated as worse than death and were accepted in health states rated as better than death. Reasons for discordance were elicited at the final interview.

Results: The probability of refusal of prospective treatment was strongly related to health state ratings. Odds ratios ranged from 1.7 to 1.9 (P < 0.001) for every treatment. When patients were shown their discordant preferences, they had a coherent explanation or changed their health state rating or treatment preference to make the two concordant.

Conclusions: Prospective life-sustaining treatment preferences show high convergent validity. For most persons, treatment preferences are grounded in a consistent belief system. Concordance and discordance between treatment preferences and health state ratings offer clinicians the opportunity to explore patients' values and reasoning.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of Washington and Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Jeremy Sugarman, Bruce Psaty, and J. Randall Curtis for their helpful comments on earlier drafts of this manuscript.
Grant Support: In part by grant HS06343 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health and Human Services.
Requests for Reprints: Donald L. Patrick. PhD, MSPH, Department of Health Services, Box 357660, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7660.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Patrick: Department of Health Services, Box 357660, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-7660.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Crit CareHome page
B. J. Daly
An Indecent Proposal: Withholding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Am. J. Crit. Care., July 1, 2008; 17(4): 377 - 380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Starks and J. R. Curtis
Is Withholding Life Support Associated With a Premature Death?: If So, What Does This Mean for ICU Practice?
Chest, June 1, 2008; 133(6): 1298 - 1300.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
H. Shanawani, M. D. Wenrich, M. R. Tonelli, and J. R. Curtis
Meeting Physicians' Responsibilities in Providing End-of-Life Care
Chest, March 1, 2008; 133(3): 775 - 786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. Mitsumoto and J. G. Rabkin
Palliative Care for Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: "Prepare for the Worst and Hope for the Best"
JAMA, July 11, 2007; 298(2): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
Kara Zivin Bambauer and M. R. Gillick
The Effect of Underlying Health Status on Patient or Surrogate Preferences for End-of-Life Care: A Pilot Study
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2007; 24(3): 185 - 190.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C. J McPherson, K. G Wilson, and M. A. Murray
Feeling like a burden to others: a systematic review focusing on the end of life
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 115 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. R. Fried, A. L. Byers, W. T. Gallo, P. H. Van Ness, V. R. Towle, J. R. O'Leary, and J. A. Dubin
Prospective Study of Health Status Preferences and Changes in Preferences Over Time in Older Adults.
Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 890 - 895.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
R. Schiff, P. Sacares, J. Snook, C. Rajkumar, and C. J. Bulpitt
Living wills and the Mental Capacity Act: a postal questionnaire survey of UK geriatricians
Age Ageing, March 1, 2006; 35(2): 116 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. G. Holloway, C. G. Benesch, W. S. Burgin, and J. B. Zentner
Prognosis and Decision Making in Severe Stroke
JAMA, August 10, 2005; 294(6): 725 - 733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. A. Hampson and E. J. Emanuel
The Prognosis For Changes In End-Of-Life Care After The Schiavo Case
Health Aff., July 1, 2005; 24(4): 972 - 975.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. A. Pearlman, H. Starks, K. C. Cain, and W. G. Cole
Improvements in Advance Care Planning in the Veterans Affairs System: Results of a Multifaceted Intervention
Arch Intern Med, March 28, 2005; 165(6): 667 - 674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
E. Voogt, A. van der Heide, J. A.C. Rietjens, A. F. van Leeuwen, A. P. Visser, C. C.D. van der Rijt, and P. J. van der Maas
Attitudes of Patients With Incurable Cancer Toward Medical Treatment in the Last Phase of Life
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 2012 - 2019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
R. T. Penson, K. J. Daniels, and T. J. Lynch Jr.
Too Old to Care?
Oncologist, June 1, 2004; 9(3): 343 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
T. R. Fried, E. H. Bradley, and V. R. Towle
Valuing the Outcomes of Treatment: Do Patients and Their Caregivers Agree?
Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2003; 163(17): 2073 - 2078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
T. R. Fried, E. H. Bradley, V. R. Towle, and H. Allore
Understanding the Treatment Preferences of Seriously Ill Patients
N. Engl. J. Med., April 4, 2002; 346(14): 1061 - 1066.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Understanding Costs and Cost-Effectiveness in Critical Care . Report from the Second American Thoracic Society Workshop on Outcomes Research
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., February 15, 2002; 165(4): 540 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. G. Ray
Evidence in Upheaval: Incorporating Observational Data Into Clinical Practice
Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2002; 162(3): 249 - 254.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
L. Emanuel
How living wills can help doctors and patients talk about dying
BMJ, June 17, 2000; 320(7250): 1618 - 1619.
[Full Text]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
J. R. Curtis, D. L. Patrick, E. S. Caldwell, and A. C. Collier
The Attitudes of Patients With Advanced AIDS Toward Use of the Medical Futility Rationale in Decisions to Forgo Mechanical Ventilation
Arch Intern Med, June 12, 2000; 160(11): 1597 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K. Mystakidou, E. Tsilika, S. Befon, V. Kululias, and L. Vlahos
Quality of life as a parameter determining therapeutic choices in cancer care in a Greek sample
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 1999; 13(5): 385 - 392.
[Abstract] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Physicians.