 |
 |
|
Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
1 April 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 7 | Pages 561-582
Purpose: To review the literature on risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era and to propose an algorithm for early and continual risk assessment.
Data Sources: A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature on humans was done using the terms myocardial infarction, prospective studies, and prognosis. This search was supplemented by narrowed searches for subheadings (such as cardiogenic shock, thrombolytic therapy, and stress testing) and surveys of references cited in review articles and book chapters.
Study Selection: Literature on prognosis and myocardial infarction published from 1981 to 1996 was considered. From the literature on stress testing methods, studies that enrolled patients before 1980, enrolled patients for indications other than myocardial infarction, tested patients more than 6 weeks after infarction, were missing outcome data, or had inadequate follow-up were excluded.
Data Extraction: Because too few randomized trials were available to allow the cross-comparison of risk-stratification methods, the available observational data were synthesized and supplemented with clinical judgments to produce recommendations.
Data Synthesis: Risk stratification must begin when acute myocardial infarction is diagnosed. High-risk patients (such as those with cardiogenic shock) and candidates for reperfusion therapy must be identified quickly if ideal emergency care is to be given. At specific points during hospitalization, specialized tests may be useful if they add incremental information to the results of clinical evaluations. High-risk patients who have complications after infarction or significant left ventricular dysfunction probably benefit from early angiography; patients without these conditions are at low risk for recurrent events and should have noninvasive stress testing for further risk stratification.
Conclusions: Physicians should continually reappraise risk throughout hospitalization to optimize both patient outcomes and cost containment.
Author and Article Information
From Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
POSITION PAPER
Clinical Guideline: Part II: Risk Stratification after Myocardial Infarction
Acknowledgment: The authors thank Patricia Williams for editorial assistance.
Requests for Reprints: Eric D. Peterson, MD, MPH, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Bay A-1, 2024 West Main Street, Durham, NC 27705.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Peterson and Califf: Duke Clinical Research Institute, Bay A-1, 2024 West Main Street, Durham, NC 27705.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. R. Pries, H. Habazettl, G. Ambrosio, P. R. Hansen, J. C. Kaski, V. Schachinger, H. Tillmanns, G. Vassalli, I. Tritto, M. Weis, et al. A review of methods for assessment of coronary microvascular disease in both clinical and experimental settings Cardiovasc Res, June 25, 2008; (2008) cvn136v2. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. Anderson, C. D. Adams, E. M. Antman, C. R. Bridges, R. M. Califf, D. E. Casey Jr, W. E. Chavey II, F. M. Fesmire, J. S. Hochman, T. N. Levin, et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) Developed in Collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 14, 2007; 50(7): e1 - e157. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Velazquez, G. S. Francis, P. W. Armstrong, P. E. Aylward, R. Diaz, C. M. O'Connor, H. D. White, M. Henis, L. M. Rittenhouse, R. Kilaru, et al. An international perspective on heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction complicating myocardial infarction: the VALIANT registry Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2004; 25(21): 1911 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A A Awad-Elkarim, J P Bagger, C J Albers, J S Skinner, P C Adams, and R J C Hall A prospective study of long term prognosis in young myocardial infarction survivors: the prognostic value of angiography and exercise testing Heart, August 1, 2003; 89(8): 843 - 847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. A. Petersen, S.-L. T. Normand, L. L. Leape, and B. J. McNeil Regionalization and the Underuse of Angiography in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System as Compared with a Fee-for-Service System N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2003; 348(22): 2209 - 2217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. A. East, J. G. Jollis, C. L. Nelson, D. Marks, and E. D. Peterson The influence of left ventricular hypertrophyon survival in patients with coronaryartery disease: do race and gender matter? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 19, 2003; 41(6): 949 - 954. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. Lalouschek, W. Lang, S. Greisenegger, and M. Mullner Determination of Lipid Profiles and Use of Statins in Patients With Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack Stroke, January 1, 2003; 34(1): 105 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Spacek, P. Widimsky, Z. Straka, E. Jiresova, J. Dvorak, R. Polasek, I. Karel, R. Jirmar, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky, et al. V_alue of First Day Angiography/Angioplasty I_n Evolving N_on-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An O_pen Multicenter Randomized Trial. The VINO Study Eur. Heart J., February 1, 2002; 23(3): 230 - 238. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. J. Shaw, A. E. Iskandrian, R. Hachamovitch, G. Germano, H. C. Lewin, T. M. Bateman, and D. S. Berman Evidence-Based Risk Assessment in Noninvasive Imaging J. Nucl. Med., September 1, 2001; 42(9): 1424 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist, L. Bossaert, G. Breithardt, P. Brugada, A.J. Camm, R. Cappato, S.M. Cobbe, C. Di Mario, et al. Task Force on Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2001; 22(16): 1374 - 1450. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. M. Krumholz, J. Chen, Y.-T. Chen, Y. Wang, and M. J. Radford Predicting one-year mortality among elderly survivors of hospitalization for an acute myocardial infarction: results from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 453 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. K. Teo and D. J. Catellier Risk prediction after myocardial infarction in the elderly J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 2001; 38(2): 460 - 463. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L Wilhelmsen, K Pyorala, H Wedel, T Cook, T Pedersen, J Kjekshus, and for the 4S Study Group Risk factors for a major coronary event after myocardial infarction in the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S). Impact of predicted risk on the benefit of cholesterol-lowering treatment Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2001; 22(13): 1119 - 1127. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. D. Guerci, Y. Arad, L. J. Shaw, R. A. O'Rourke, B. H. Brundage, V. F. Froelicher, P. Greenland, S. M. Grundy, R. Hachamovitch, G. M. Pohost, et al. Electron Beam Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease Response Circulation, April 24, 2001; 103 (16): e87 - e87. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Malach, J. Quinley, P. J. Imperato, and M. Wallen Improving Lipid Evaluation and Management in Medicare Patients Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, March 26, 2001; 161(6): 839 - 844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Braunwald, E. M. Antman, J. W. Beasley, R. M. Califf, M. D. Cheitlin, J. S. Hochman, R. H. Jones, D. Kereiakes, J. Kupersmith, T. N. Levin, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the american college of cardiology/ american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 970 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Timmis Coronary disease: Acute coronary syndromes: risk stratification Heart, February 1, 2000; 83(2): 241 - 246. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Z. Dickinson, H. J. Dworkin, J. H. O'Keefe, Jr, T. M. Bateman, R. J. Gibbons, S. Kymes, L. Shaw, J. Fletcher, K. E. Fleischmann, M. G. M. Hunink, et al. Exercise Echocardiography vs Exercise SPECT Testing JAMA, November 3, 1999; 282(17): 1621 - 1623. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Ryan, E. M. Antman, N. H. Brooks, R. M. Califf, L. D. Hillis, L. F. Hiratzka, E. Rapaport, B. Riegel, R. O. Russell, E. E. Smith III, et al. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 1999; 34(3): 890 - 911. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Salustri, M. Ciavatti, F. Seccareccia, and A. Palamara Prediction of cardiac events after uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction by clinical variables and dobutamine stress test J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 1, 1999; 34(2): 435 - 440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R J Trent and J M Rawles Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction by Doppler stroke distance measurement Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 187 - 191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Batchelor, E. D. Peterson, D. B. Mark, J. D. Knight, C. B. Granger, P. W. Armstrong, and R. M. Califf A comparison of U.S. and Canadian cardiac catheterization practices in detecting severe coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction: efficiency, yield and long-term implications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. J. Goldberg, N. A. Samad, J. Yarzebski, J. Gurwitz, C. Bigelow, and J. M. Gore Temporal Trends in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., April 15, 1999; 340(15): 1162 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Cheema, K. Sheu, M. Parker, A. H. Kadish, and J. J. Goldberger Nonsustained Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction : Tachycardia Characteristics and Their Prognostic Implications Circulation, November 10, 1998; 98(19): 2030 - 2036. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Z. Ayanian, M. B. Landrum, S.-L. T. Normand, E. Guadagnoli, and B. J. McNeil Rating the Appropriateness of Coronary Angiography -- Do Practicing Physicians Agree with an Expert Panel and with Each Other? N. Engl. J. Med., June 25, 1998; 338(26): 1896 - 1904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 New Guidelines for Risk Stratification for MI Journal Watch Cardiology, May 5, 1997; 1997(505): 3 - 3. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Guidelines for Post-MI Risk Stratification Journal Watch Women's Health, May 1, 1997; 1997(501): 5 - 5. [Full Text]
|
|
Article
