Article    Table of Contents                    Full Text of this article Free    Figures/Tables List    Related articles in Annals  Services    Send comment/rapid response letter    Notify a friend about this article    Alert me when this article is cited    Add to Personal Archive    Download to Citation Manager    ACP Search                            Get Permissions  Google Scholar    Search for Related Content  PubMed Articles in PubMed by Author:    Pine, M.    Rosenthal, G. E.    Related Articles in PubMed    PubMed Citation    PubMed

ARTICLE

Predictions of Hospital Mortality Rates: A Comparison of Data Sources

Michael Pine, MD, MBA; Marija Norusis, PhD, MPH; Barbara Jones, MA; and Gary E. Rosenthal, MD

1 March 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 5 | Pages 347-354

Background: Comparing hospital mortality rates requires accurate adjustment for patients' intrinsic differences. Commercial severity systems require either administrative data that omit vital clinical facts about patients' conditions at hospital admission or costly, time-consuming abstraction of medical records. The validity of supplementing administrative data with laboratory data has not been assessed.

Objective: To compare risk-adjusted mortality predictions using administrative data alone; administrative data plus laboratory values; and the combination of administrative, laboratory, and clinical data.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: 30 acute care hospitals.

Patients: 46 769 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia.

Measurements: Each patient's probability of dying was estimated by using administrative data only (unrestricted administrative models), administrative data restricted to secondary diagnoses that are unlikely to be hospital-acquired complications (restricted administrative models), restricted administrative data plus laboratory data (laboratory models), and restricted administrative data plus laboratory and abstracted clinical data (clinical models).

Results: The unrestricted administrative models predicted death better than the restricted administrative models (average areas under the receiver-operating characteristic [ROC] curves, 0.87 and 0.75, respectively) and as well as the laboratory models and the clinical models (average areas under the ROC curves, 0.86 and 0.87, respectively). The good mortality predictions obtained by using the unrestricted administrative models result from inclusion of hospital-acquired complications that commonly precede death. The laboratory models ranked 93% of patients and 95% of hospitals in a manner similar to the clinical models; in comparison, rankings provided by the laboratory models were similar to those provided for 75% of patients and 69% of hospitals by the unrestricted administrative models and for 72% of patients and 77% of hospitals by the restricted administrative models.

Conclusions: Adding laboratory data (often available electronically) to restricted administrative data sets can provide accurate predictions of inpatient death from acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia. This alternative avoids the cost of data abstraction and the serious errors associated with using administrative data alone.

Related articles in Annals:

Editorials
How Much Are We Willing To Pay for Information about Quality of Care
Lisa I. Iezzoni

Annals 1997 126: 391-393. [Full Text]  

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Pine, H. S. Jordan, A. Elixhauser, D. E. Fry, D. C. Hoaglin, B. Jones, R. Meimban, D. Warner, and J. Gonzales Enhancement of Claims Data to Improve Risk Adjustment of Hospital Mortality JAMA, January 3, 2007; 297(1): 71 - 76. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. J. Escarce, A. K. Jain, and J. Rogowski Hospital competition, managed care, and mortality after hospitalization for medical conditions: evidence from three States. Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2006; 63(6 Suppl): 112S - 140S. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Froom and Z. Shimoni Prediction of Hospital Mortality Rates by Admission Laboratory Tests Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 325 - 328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Aronsky, P. J. Haug, C. Lagor, and N. C. Dean Accuracy of Administrative Data for Identifying Patients With Pneumonia American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2005; 20(6): 319 - 328. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Price, C. A. Estrada, and D. Thompson Case Study: Administrative Data Versus Corrected Administrative Data American Journal of Medical Quality, January 1, 2003; 18(1): 38 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M P Kossovsky, F P Sarasin, P Chopard, M Louis-Simonet, P Sigaud, T V Perneger, and J-M Gaspoz Relationship between hospital length of stay and quality of care in patients with congestive heart failure Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 219 - 223. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Polanczyk, L. E. P. Rohde, G. W. Dec, and T. DiSalvo Ten-Year Trends in Hospital Care for Congestive Heart Failure: Improved Outcomes and Increased Use of Resources Arch Intern Med, February 14, 2000; 160(3): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. F. Philbin and T. G. DiSalvo Prediction of hospital readmission for heart failure: development of a simple risk score based on administrative data J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 1999; 33(6): 1560 - 1566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Information Needed to Predict MI Death Journal Watch Cardiology, March 25, 1997; 1997(325): 3 - 3. [Full Text]