Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Glassman, P. A.
space
  arrow  Peabody, J. W.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

PERSPECTIVE

The Role of Medical Necessity and Cost-Effectiveness in Making Medical Decisions

right arrow Peter A. Glassman, MBBS, MSc; Karyn E. Model, PhD; James P. Kahan, PhD; Peter D. Jacobson, JD, MPH; and John W. Peabody, MD, PhD

15 January 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 2 | Pages 152-156

The term "medical necessity" is used ubiquitously in health care, but its meaning and implementation vary substantially among providers, payers, and patients.This ambiguity has led some to suggest that cost-effectiveness be used as a basis for decision rules. This paper presents an analytical framework that is familiar to clinicians and shows that medical necessity and cost-effectiveness do not provide deterministic rules for clinical decision making. First, 2 x 2 tables are used to show the tradeoff between the sensitivity and specificity of decision rules. Then, the example of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm is used to show that these tradeoffs can be seen as a continuum of decision rules on a receiver-operating characteristic curve. Society can therefore choose a decision threshold on the basis of medical necessity that optimizes the number of lives saved or any other desired outcome, but the tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity cannot be avoided. Applying cost-effectiveness criteria may change the decision threshold because cost-effectiveness itself involves inherent tradeoffs that create additional ambiguity for clinical decisions. The conclusion is that decision rules based on medical necessity or cost-effectiveness should not be considered deterministic. Rather, decision rules are useful when they make assumptions explicit and specify tradeoffs so that clinicians, patients, and payers can make better decisions.

Author and Article Information
space

From the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; RAND, Santa Monica, California; and the European American Center, Delft, the Netherlands.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the anonymous reviewers of this paper for their suggestions and comments.
Requests for Reprints: John W. Peabody, MD, PhD, RAND, PO Box 2138, 1700 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Glassman: Division of General Internal Medicine (111G), West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90073.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. M. Studdert and C. R. Gresenz
Enrollee Appeals of Preservice Coverage Denials at 2 Health Maintenance Organizations
JAMA, February 19, 2003; 289(7): 864 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
C. R. Gresenz, D. M. Studdert, N. Campbell, and D. R. Hensler
Patients In Conflict With Managed Care: A Profile Of Appeals In Two HMOs
Health Aff., July 1, 2002; 21(4): 189 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychiatr. Serv.Home page
P. B. Rosenquist, C. C. Colenda, J. Briggs, S. I. Kramer, and M. Lancaster
Best Practices: Using Case Vignettes to Train Clinicians and Utilization Reviewers to Make Level-of-Care Decisions
Psychiatr Serv, November 1, 2000; 51(11): 1363 - 1365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
E. H. Morreim
Quality of Life: Erosions and Opportunities Under Managed Care
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2000; 28(2): 144 - 158.
[PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Physicians.