Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Daugherty, C. K.
space
  arrow  Zimmer, G.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

PERSPECTIVE

Learning from Our Patients: One Participant's Impact on Clinical Trial Research and Informed Consent

right arrow Christopher K. Daugherty, MD; Mark Siegler, MD; Mark J. Ratain, MD; and George Zimmer, PhD

1 June 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 11 | Pages 892-897

This Perspective includes an essay on modifying phase I clinical trials, written by George Zimmer, who was a professor of English and a commentary on that essay.Professor Zimmer was a cancer patient who participated in the phase I clinical trial program at the University of Chicago. His ideas are eloquently expressed and have had a profound effect on our investigational research for anticancer agents. Although at times his suggestions may seem radical, Professor Zimmer urges us to reconsider the 50-year-old Nuremberg paradigm that participants in human research are ignorant and vulnerable and must be protected. Although we must protect patients who have life-threatening diseases from coercive inducements and misplaced hopes, we must also listen carefully and thoughtfully to our patients. This is particularly true when, as research participants in the face of sacrifice and the threat of a life-ending diagnosis, they have made the effort to express their concerns. With the effect of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome movement on clinical studies and on drug research and development, a precedent has been set that allows patients to reshape their role as participants in research trials. On a personal level, the essay by Professor Zimmer has had a significant effect on our research methods and, indeed, the focus of our research efforts. Thus, it is with a sense of respect and honor that we share George Zimmer's thoughts and our comments about the influence he has had on our research practices.

Author and Article Information
space

From the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Acknowledgment: The authors thank the widow of Professor Zimmer, Mrs. Barbara Zimmer, for granting permission to publish his essay.
Grant Support: By grant PRTA-24 from the American Cancer Society; the MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics; the Pew Charitable Trust; the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; and public health service contract NO1-CMO7301 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Requests for Reprints: Christopher Daugherty, MD, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, MC-2115, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637-1470.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Daugherty: Section of Hematology/Oncology, The MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, MC-2115, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Agrawal, C. Grady, D. L. Fairclough, N. J. Meropol, K. Maynard, and E. J. Emanuel
Patients' Decision-Making Process Regarding Participation in Phase I Oncology Research
J. Clin. Oncol., September 20, 2006; 24(27): 4479 - 4484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
E. Horstmann, M. S. McCabe, L. Grochow, S. Yamamoto, L. Rubinstein, T. Budd, D. Shoemaker, E. J. Emanuel, and C. Grady
Risks and Benefits of Phase 1 Oncology Trials, 1991 through 2002
N. Engl. J. Med., March 3, 2005; 352(9): 895 - 904.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. G. Roberts Jr, B. H. Goulart, L. Squitieri, S. C. Stallings, E. F. Halpern, B. A. Chabner, G. S. Gazelle, S. N. Finkelstein, and J. W. Clark
Trends in the Risks and Benefits to Patients With Cancer Participating in Phase 1 Clinical Trials
JAMA, November 3, 2004; 292(17): 2130 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Agrawal and E. J. Emanuel
Ethics of Phase 1 Oncology Studies: Reexamining the Arguments and Data
JAMA, August 27, 2003; 290(8): 1075 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch Jr.
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist, June 1, 2002; 7(90002): 8 - 15.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. Yuval, D. A. Halon, A. Merdler, N. Khader, B. Karkabi, K. Uziel, and B. S. Lewis
Patient Comprehension and Reaction to Participating in a Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial (ISIS-4) in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2000; 160(8): 1142 - 1146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. K. Daugherty
Impact of Therapeutic Research on Informed Consent and the Ethics of Clinical Trials: A Medical Oncology Perspective
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 1999; 17(5): 1601 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. C. Lintz, R. T. Penson, B. A. Chabner, S. Mack, and T. J. Lynch
A Staff Dialogue on Phase I Trials: Psychosocial Issues Faced by Patients, Their Families, and Caregivers
Oncologist, October 1, 1998; 3(5): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1997 by the American College of Physicians.