 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 January 1997 | Volume 126 Issue 1 | Pages 13-19
Background: Previous studies have shown that the rate of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is much higher in New York State than in Ontario.
Objective: To compare the service context and clinical characteristics of patients having CABG surgery in New York and Ontario.
Design: Retrospective analysis of data from cardiac surgery registries in New York and Ontario.
Patients: All 16 690 patients in New York and 5517 patients in Ontario who had isolated CABG surgery in 1993.
Measurements: Clinical characteristics of patients having CABG surgery and rates of CABG surgery by coronary anatomy.
Results: The overall age-adjusted rate of isolated CABG surgery was 1.79 times (95% CI, 1.74 to 1.85) greater in New York than in Ontario. Patients who had CABG surgery in New York were more likely to be elderly and female and to have recently had myocardial infarction (P < 0.001), whereas patients who had CABG surgery in Ontario were more likely to have had left ventricular dysfunction and severe coronary artery disease (two-vessel disease with proximal left anterior descending disease, three-vessel disease, or left main disease) (P < 0.001). The relative rate of CABG surgery for left main disease was 2.53 times (CI, 2.35 to 2.73) greater in New York than in Ontario but was 8.97 times (CI, 8.01 to 10.06) greater for patients with limited coronary artery disease (one-vessel or two-vessel disease without proximal left anterior descending disease).
Conclusions: The higher rates of CABG surgery in New York are associated with higher rates of CABG surgery among the elderly, women, and patients who recently had myocardial infarction. Potential underservicing in Ontario is suggested by a lower rate of CABG surgery for left main disease; however, the higher rate of CABG surgery in New York is also associated with a strikingly higher rate of surgery in patients with limited coronary disease. Such trade-offs highlight the difficulty of defining an optimal rate of CABG surgery.
Author and Article Information
The Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario*.
ARTICLE
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Ontario and New York State: Which Rate Is Right?
From Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; the State University of New York and New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York; and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
*For members of the Steering Committee of the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario, see the Appendix.
Note: The results and conclusions are those of the authors; no official endorsement by the Ontario Ministry of Health is intended or should be inferred.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank John Z. Ayanian, MD, and Joseph P. Newhouse, PhD, for their comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. The authors also thank all of the cardiovascular medical and surgical practitioners, nurses, and registry personnel who make up the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario and the Cardiac Advisory Committee of the State of New York.
Grant Support: By grants HS06503, HS08071, and HS08464 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Rockville, Maryland; a Health Research Personnel Development Program Fellowship (04544) from the Ontario Ministry of Health (Dr. Tu); and a Career Scientist Award (02377) from the Ontario Ministry of Health (Dr. Naylor).
Requests for Reprints: Jack V. Tu, MD, PhD, Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G-106, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Tu and Naylor: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, G-106, 2075 Bayview Avenue, North York, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. T. Ko, Y. Wang, D. A. Alter, J. P. Curtis, S. S. Rathore, T. A. Stukel, F. A. Masoudi, J. S. Ross, J. M. Foody, and H. M. Krumholz Regional Variation in Cardiac Catheterization Appropriateness and Baseline Risk After Acute Myocardial Infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 19, 2008; 51(7): 716 - 723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. B. Weeks and E. S. Fisher Characteristics of VA Patients Who Use Low-Quality Private-Sector CABG Centers in New York Med Care Res Rev, December 1, 2007; 64(6): 691 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. M. Graham, W. A. Ghali, P. D. Faris, P. D. Galbraith, J. V. Tu, C. M. Norris, A. Zentner, M. L. Knudtson, and for the APPROACH Investigators Population rates of cardiac catheterization and yield of high-risk coronary artery disease Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 5, 2005; 173(1): 35 - 39. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. K. Natarajan, A. Gafni, and S. Yusuf Determining optimal population rates of cardiac catheterization: A phantom alternative? Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 5, 2005; 173(1): 49 - 52. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. L. Ferrer, S. J. Hambidge, and R. C. Maly The Essential Role of Generalists in Health Care Systems Ann Intern Med, April 19, 2005; 142(8): 691 - 699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. J Sistino Expanding the role of perfusionists in the era of new treatment options for cardiovascular disease Perfusion, July 1, 2003; 18(4): 253 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. J Sistino Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the last decade: treatment options and implications for perfusion in the 21st century Perfusion, March 1, 2003; 18(2): 73 - 77. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R M Martin, H Hemingway, D Gunnell, K R Karsch, A Baumbach, and S Frankel Population need for coronary revascularisation: are national targets for England credible? Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(6): 627 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. L. Booth, B. Zinman, and D. A. Redelmeier Diabetes Care in the U.S. and Canada Diabetes Care, July 1, 2002; 25(7): 1149 - 1153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. A. Ray, K. J. Buth, J. A. Sullivan, D. E. Johnstone, and G. M. Hirsch Waiting for Cardiac Surgery: Results of a Risk-Stratified Queuing Process Circulation, September 18, 2001; 104 (2008): I-92 - I-98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Fitch, P. Lazaro, M. D. Aguilar, J. P. Kahan, M. van het Loo, and S. J. Bernstein European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2000; 18(4): 380 - 387. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. L. Holman, E. D. Peterson, C. L. Athanasuleas, R. M. Allman, M. Sansom, C. Kiefe, and R. G. Sherrill Alabama Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Cooperative Project: baseline data Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1999; 68(5): 1592 - 1598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. A. Eagle, R. A. Guyton, R. Davidoff, G. A. Ewy, J. Fonger, T. J. Gardner, J. P. Gott, H. C. Herrmann, R. A. Marlow, W. C. Nugent, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association task force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to revise the 1991 Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery) J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1262 - 1347. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Brophy, L. Joseph, and P. Theroux Medical Decision Making in the Choice of a Thrombolytic Agent for Acute Myocardial Infarction Med Decis Making, October 1, 1999; 19(4): 411 - 418. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. B. Batchelor, E. D. Peterson, D. B. Mark, J. D. Knight, C. B. Granger, P. W. Armstrong, and R. M. Califf A comparison of U.S. and Canadian cardiac catheterization practices in detecting severe coronary artery disease after myocardial infarction: efficiency, yield and long-term implications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1999; 34(1): 12 - 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. S. Fisher and H. G. Welch Avoiding the Unintended Consequences of Growth in Medical Care: How Might More Be Worse? JAMA, February 3, 1999; 281(5): 446 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Wright, L. A. Petersen, and J. Daley Availability of Cardiac Technology: Trends in Procedure Use and Outcomes for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1998; 55(2): 239 - 254. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ivanov, R. D. Weisel, T. E. David, and C. D. Naylor Fifteen-Year Trends in Risk Severity and Operative Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Circulation, February 24, 1998; 97(7): 673 - 680. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Mosca, J. E. Manson, S. E. Sutherland, R. D. Langer, T. Manolio, E. Barrett-Connor, and E. Barrett-Connor Cardiovascular Disease in Women : A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association Circulation, October 7, 1997; 96(7): 2468 - 2482. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 What Is the ""Right"" CABG Rate? Journal Watch Cardiology, January 27, 1997; 1997(127): 11 - 11. [Full Text]
|
|
Article
