Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 October 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 8 | Pages 669-674
Six years ago, we proposed a patient benefit-centered definition of medical futility that included both quantitative and qualitative components. We distinguished between an effect of a treatment that is limited to some part of a patient's body and a benefit that improves the patient as a whole. The quantitative portion of our definition stipulated that physicians should regard a treatment as futile if empirical data show that the treatment has less than a 1 in 100 chance of benefiting the patient. The qualitative portion of our definition stipulated that if a treatment merely preserves permanent unconsciousness or cannot end dependence on intensive medical care, physicians should consider the treatment futile. In this paper, we clarify and modify our original proposal and respond to the following major criticisms: 1) Medical futility is simply an attempt to increase the power of the physician over the patient and to repeal recent hard-gained advances in patient autonomy; 2) no professional or societal consensus has been achieved about the definition of futility; 3) futility is a value-laden determination, the usurpation of which by medicine is inappropriate unless only a so-called value-free or strict physiologic definition of futility is used; 4) the concept of futility is not practically useful because empirical treatment data cannot be applied with certainty to any given patient; 5) futility undermines our pluralistic society and threatens, among other things, the free exercise of religion; and 6) because cost considerations will ultimately dictate all such decisions, futility is an unnecessary concept.
Author and Article Information
From the University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES
Medical Futility: Response to Critiques
![]()
Grant Support: By grant R18 HS 5617 from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
Requests for Reprints: Lawrence J. Schneiderman, MD, University of California, San Diego, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093-0622.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Schneiderman: University of California, San Diego, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093-0622.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. H. Bloom In Defense of Futile Gestures J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3276 - 3278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Hozo and B. Djulbegovic When Is Diagnostic Testing Inappropriate or Irrational? Acceptable Regret Approach Med Decis Making, July 1, 2008; 28(4): 540 - 553. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sibbald MSc, J. Downar MD, and L. Hawryluck MD MSc Perceptions of "futile care" among caregivers in intensive care units Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 6, 2007; 177(10): 1201 - 1208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Curtis and R. A. Burt Point: The Ethics of Unilateral "Do Not Resuscitate" Orders: The Role of "Informed Assent" Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3): 748 - 751. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R K Mohindra Medical futility: a conceptual model J. Med. Ethics, February 1, 2007; 33(2): 71 - 75. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Helton, J. T. van der Steen, T. P. Daaleman, G. R. Gamble, and M. W. Ribbe A Cross-Cultural Study of Physician Treatment Decisions for Demented Nursing Home Patients Who Develop Pneumonia Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2006; 4(3): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Afessa, M. T. Keegan, Z. Mohammad, J. D. Finkielman, and S. G. Peters Identifying Potentially Ineffective Care in the Sickest Critically Ill Patients on the Third ICU Day Chest, December 1, 2004; 126(6): 1905 - 1909. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bailey The Concept of Futility in Health Care Decision Making Nursing Ethics, January 1, 2004; 11(1): 77 - 83. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Prendergast and K. A. Puntillo Withdrawal of Life Support: Intensive Caring at the End of Life JAMA, December 4, 2002; 288(21): 2732 - 2740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chao, N. Chan, and W. Chan Euthanasia revisited Fam. Pract., April 1, 2002; 19(2): 128 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Schneiderman, N. S. Jecker, A. R. Jonsen, J. R. Curtis, D. L. Patrick, E. S. Caldwell, and A. C. Collier Abuse of Futility Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2001; 161(1): 128 - 130. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ardagh Futility has no utility in resuscitation medicine J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2000; 26(5): 396 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Schneiderman Commentary: Weighing and Comparing Expert Testimony by Medical Ethicists J. Law Med. Ethics, September 1, 2000; 28(3): 236 - 239. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dunphy Futilitarianism: knowing how much is enough in end-of-life health care Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2000; 14(4): 313 - 322. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E. Nelson and D. E. Meier Palliative Care in the Intensive Care Unit: Part I: Nelson JE, Meier DE Palliative care in the intensive care unit part I J Intensive Care Med 1999,14 130-139 J Intensive Care Med, May 1, 1999; 14(3): 130 - 139. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Luce Making decisions about the forgoing of life-sustaining therapy Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 1997; 156(6): 1715 - 1718. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||