| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 September 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 6 | Pages 502-506
Current recommendations for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia include drug therapy for persons at sufficiently elevated risk for coronary heart disease.However, no guidelines incorporate the effects of alternative interventions that decrease risk for coronary heart disease but are not used specifically to alter blood lipids.
We did a simulation study to estimate the number of hypercholesterolemic adults who would continue to exceed a high-risk threshold after receiving aspirin, antihypertensive medication, and estrogen-replacement therapy. We found that of all persons who are currently candidates for hypolipidemic medication because they are at high risk for coronary heart disease, 6 to 8 million would no longer have this therapy recommended if the abilities of alternative interventions to reduce risk were considered. Pharmaceutical cost savings associated with alternative interventions range from $3 to $4 billion per year. Current guidelines should be revised to account for this effect.
Author and Article Information
From the Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
PERSPECTIVE
Lowering Risk without Lowering Cholesterol: Implications for National Cholesterol Policy
![]()
Grant Support: In part by grants HL51024 and HL46297 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Requests for Reprints: Andrew L. Avins, MD, MPH, General Internal Medicine Section, 111A1, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Avins and Browner: General Internal Medicine Section, 111A1, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 4150 Clement Street, San Francisco, CA 94121.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Garber Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis To Target Cholesterol Reduction Ann Intern Med, May 16, 2000; 132(10): 833 - 835. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Avins and W. S. Browner Improving the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease to Aid in the Management of High Cholesterol Levels: What a Difference a Decade Makes JAMA, February 11, 1998; 279(6): 445 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. LaRosa and T. A. Pearson Cholesterol Screening Guidelines : Consensus, Evidence, and the Departure From Common Sense Circulation, March 18, 1997; 95(6): 1651 - 1653. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
Alternatives in Hypercholesterolemia Journal Watch Cardiology, November 22, 1996; 1996(1122): 8 - 8. [Full Text] |
||||