| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 September 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 6 | Pages 476-480
Background: The number of very elderly persons who are candidates for implantation of a permanent pacemaker is increasing, but the effect of cardiac pacing on long-term survival and functional variables has not been determined.
Objective: To determine long-term survival after implantation of a permanent pacemaker in octogenarians and nonagenarians and to assess functional independence after such implantation.
Design: Retrospective, population-based cohort study.
Setting: Epidemiologic setting from an unselected population.
Patients: 157 octogenarians and nonagenarians who initially received a pacemaker between 1962 and 1988 and were followed through 1992.
Main Outcome Measures: Overall mortality rate, functional capabilities, and placement in a nursing home.
Results: Observed survival in patients with heart disease was significantly worse than that in age- and sex-matched controls (P < 0.001). Observed survival in community residents without heart disease was similar to that in controls (P > 0.2). Multivariable analysis identified congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, old age, syncope, cancer, and atrioventricular block as independent predictors of increased mortality. Symptoms decreased in 118 patients (75%) after pacemaker implantation. After implantation, 70 patients (45%) were permanently placed in nursing homes; this number is similar to the estimated probability of lifetime use of nursing homes from the National Mortality Followback Survey. Dementia developed or worsened in 51 patients (32%), and orthopedic disability occurred in 41 patients (26%).
Conclusions: Normal relative survival in octogenarians and nonagenarians without heart disease is reassuring; the poor prognosis in patients with heart disease warrants careful evaluation of the methods and indications for cardiac pacing. Permanent pacing alleviates bradycardia-related symptoms. Placement in a nursing home and development or worsening of cardiac, neurologic, or orthopedic disabilities frequently occur after implantation of a permanent pacemaker in the very elderly.
Author and Article Information
From the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Survival and Functional Independence after Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians: A Population-Based Study
![]()
Requests for Reprints: Win-Kuang Shen, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Shen, Hayes, and Hammill: Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Brunner, M. Olschewski, A. Geibel, C. Bode, and M. Zehender Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation: Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2004; 25(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Jahangir, W.-K. Shen, S. A. Neubauer, D. J. Ballard, S. C. Hammill, D. O. Hodge, C. M. Lohse, B. J. Gersh, and D. L. Hayes Relation between mode of pacing and long-term survival in the very elderly J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 1, 1999; 33(5): 1208 - 1216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Prognosis After Permanent Pacemaker Implantation Journal Watch Cardiology, November 1, 1996; 1996(1101): 15 - 15. [Full Text] |
||||