Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 August 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 4 | Pages 280-283
Objective: To determine whether self-assessment of purified protein derivative of tuberculin (PPD) skin test reactions, done using a simple two-choice approach, is an effective screening method for tuberculosis.
Design: Double-blind comparison between self-assessments and trained professional readings of PPD skin test reactions, done 72 hours after test administration.
Setting: The New York City Fire Department's Bureau of Health Services
Participants: 2011 New York City firefighters and fire officers were given PPD skin tests during a mandatory retraining course. Thirty-seven persons were excluded because of a history of a positive PPD skin test result or a bacille CalmetteGuérin vaccination. All others agreed to participate in testing and self-assessment done using simple written instructions. Self-assessment results were submitted just before trained professional readings were done.
Measurements: Self-assessments and trained professional readings of PPD skin test reactions.
Results: 1833 participants (91%) interpreted their test reactions as flat. Of these interpretations, 1824 (99.5%) matched the professional reading and 9 (0.5%) did not. One hundred seventy-eight participants (9%) interpreted their test reactions as not flat; 136 of these interpretations (76.4%) matched the professional reading and 42 (23.6%) did not (
Conclusion: In this occupational health care setting, we follow (and recommend to others with similar populations) a tuberculin screening program based on self-assessment. Repeated tests with follow-up are required for all persons who do not report their results. All persons with self-assessments of "not flat" should return for readings by trained professionals, counseling, and treatment.
Author and Article Information
From the New York City Fire Department, Bureau of Health Services, New York, New York; Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York; and Staten Island University Hospital, Staten Island, New York.
ARTICLE
Self-Assessment of Tuberculin Skin Test Reactions by New York City Firefighters: Reliability and Cost-Effectiveness in an Occupational Health Care Setting
= 0.828; lower 95% confidence limit = 0.790). The predictive value of a negative self-assessment reading was 99.5%, and the specificity was 97.7%.
![]()
Acknowledgments: The authors thank the administration and uniformed service personnel of the New York City Fire Department for their cooperation and encouragement; the physicians and nurses of the New York City Fire Department's Bureau of Health Services for advice and help with data collection; Drs. C. Jones, J. Scheuer, T.K. Aldrich, J. Casey, and M. Catalano for encouragement and advice in study design; Ms. B. Einstein for database instruction; and Mr. Colin Jost for data entry.
Grant Support: By a research fellowship grant from the New York Lung Association (Dr. Karwa).
Requests for Reprints: David J. Prezant, MD, Montefiore Medical Center, Pulmonary Division, Centennial 423, Bronx, NY 10467.
Current Author Addresses: Drs. Prezant and Karwa: Montefiore Medical Center, Pulmonary Division, Centennial 423, Bronx, NY 10467.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Froehlich, L. M. Ackerson, P. A. Morozumi, and the Pediatric Tuberculosis Study Group of Kaiser P Targeted Testing of Children for Tuberculosis: Validation of a Risk Assessment Questionnaire Pediatrics, April 1, 2001; 107(4): e54 - e54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. O. Ozuah, W. Burton, K. A. Lerro, J. Rosenstock, and M. Mulvihill Assessing the Validity of Tuberculin Skin Test Readings by Trained Professionals and Patients Chest, July 1, 1999; 116(1): 104 - 106. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
SELF-ASSESSED TUBERCULIN SKIN TESTS Journal Watch (General), September 3, 1996; 1996(903): 2 - 2. [Full Text] |
||||