Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Schectman, G.
space
  arrow  Hiatt, J.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

REVIEW

Dose-Response Characteristics of Cholesterol-Lowering Drug Therapies: Implications for Treatment

right arrow Gordon Schectman, MD, and Jan Hiatt, PharmD

15 December 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 12 | Pages 990-1000

Purpose: To develop an optimal treatment strategy that reduces low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels and improves adherence to therapy by reviewing clinical trials that define the dose-response characteristics for 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins), bile acid sequestrants, and niacin.

Data Sources: Data were obtained from a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature published from 1975 through November 1995 and from an extensive bibliography review.

Study Selection: Controlled, clinical trials were reviewed if they evaluated 1) the effectiveness and toxicity of one LDL cholesterol-lowering agent [statins, bile acid sequestrants, or niacin, at two or more doses] or 2) monotherapy with two LDL cholesterol-lowering agents at defined doses used alone and in combination. Studies that had fewer than 10 patients in a treatment group or that selected patients on the basis of previous response to therapy were not included.

Data Extraction: Trials were reviewed for overall methodology, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sources of bias, and outcomes.

Data Synthesis: Dose-response relations for bile acid sequestrants and statins are nonlinear, and most of their LDL cholesterol-lowering effects can be obtained with lower doses. The few dose-response studies of niacin that have been done suggest that most of niacin's high-density lipoprotein cholesterol-increasing effect can also be achieved with relatively low doses, but higher doses are needed to substantially reduce LDL cholesterol levels. If bile acid sequestrants or niacin are added to statin therapy, the effect of combined therapy on LDL cholesterol levels is additive.

Conclusion: The nonlinear dose-response relation of statins, bile acid sequestrants, and niacin and their additive LDL cholesterol-lowering effect when used together suggest a strategy for treating hypercholesterolemia that may optimize effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects and cost.

Author and Article Information
space

From Medical College of Wisconsin and the Milwaukee Veterans Administration Medical Center.
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Ms. Sue Goodman for her careful and thorough efforts to ensure proper completion of technical portions of this manuscript and Jerry VanRuiswyk, MD, for his careful review of the manuscript and assistance with the quantitative aspects of the data synthesis.
Requests for Reprints: Gordon Schectman, MD, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Lutheran Memorial Hospital East, Box 135, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Schectman: Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Froedtert Lutheran Memorial Hospital East, Box 135, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
L. Izzat
The MERCURY II trial: benefits of rosuvastatin
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, July 1, 2006; 6(4): 171 - 176.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
T. Claudel, B. Staels, and F. Kuipers
The Farnesoid X Receptor: A Molecular Link Between Bile Acid and Lipid and Glucose Metabolism
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2005; 25(10): 2020 - 2030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular DiseaseHome page
A. Rees
Review: Ezetimibe -- clinical and pharmacological profile
The British Journal of Diabetes & Vascular Disease, May 1, 2004; 4(3): 163 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. S. Stroup, M. P. Kane, and R. S. Busch
The Antilipidemic Effects of Ezetimibe in Patients With Diabetes
Diabetes Care, October 1, 2003; 26(10): 2958 - 2959.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
M R Law, N J Wald, and A R Rudnicka
Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis
BMJ, June 25, 2003; 326(7404): 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
R. A. Kreisberg and A. Oberman
Medical Management of Hyperlipidemia/Dyslipidemia
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2445 - 2461.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
F. M. Sacks
Low-density lipoprotein lowering therapy: an analysis of the options
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 18, 2002; 40(12): 2135 - 2138.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
N. Stone
Combination therapy: its rationale and the role of ezetimibe
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2002; 4(suppl_J): J19 - J22.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart J SupplHome page
E. Leitersdorf
Cholesterol absorption inhibition: filling an unmet need in lipid-lowering management
Eur. Heart J. Suppl., June 1, 2001; 3(suppl_E): E17 - E23.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
T. A. Jacobson
"The Lower the Better" in Hypercholesterolemia Therapy: A Reliable Clinical Guideline?
Ann Intern Med, October 3, 2000; 133(7): 549 - 554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Physicians.