Home |
Current Issue |
Past Issues |
In the Clinic |
ACP Journal Club |
CME |
Collections |
Audio/Video |
Mobile |
Subscribe |
Tools |
Help |
ACP Online
|
15 December 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 12 | Pages 983-989
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a technically demanding procedure that can cause substantial complications. Competence in performing ERCP and the learning curve for achieving competence are poorly understood.
Objective: To evaluate the number of supervised ERCPs that physicians must do to achieve procedural competence. Competence was defined as a 0.8 probability of successfully completing specific technical components of ERCP and an overall grading of competence as judged by the attending physician.
Design: Prospective study.
Setting: University training program for gastroenterologists.
Participants: 17 gastroenterology fellows at various stages of training.
Measures: Experienced therapeutic endoscopists prospectively graded gastroenterology fellows during 1796 consecutive ERCPs. Fellows were graded on their overall level of competence for the procedure and on specific technical components of ERCP.
Results: Grading data were available for 1450 ERCPs (81%). The number of ERCPs done before adequate skill was achieved was 160 for cholangiography, 140 for pancreatography, 160 for deep cannulation of the pancreatic duct, 120 for stone extraction, and 60 for stent insertion. Fellows achieved overall competence after completing 180 to 200 ERCPs. The predicted probability of overall competence was 0.8 after 137 ERCPs and 0.9 after 185 ERCPs.
Conclusions: At least 180 ERCPs were required before these gastroenterology fellows could be considered competent in ERCP. This number is much greater than that previously recommended, and these findings have substantial implications for training guidelines and issues of competence and certification in ERCP. The methods used to define and evaluate competence in ERCP could also be used to assess competence in other medical procedures.
Author and Article Information
From Duke University Medical Center and Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
ACADEMIA AND CLINIC
Quantitative Assessment of Procedural Competence: A Prospective Study of Training in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
![]()
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Peter B. Cotton, MD, Steven Guarisco, MD, and Joseph Leung, MD, for participating in the initial phase of the study.
Grant Support: In part by a grant from the American College of Gastroenterology.
Requests for Reprints: Paul S. Jowell, MB, ChB, Box 3662, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Jowell: Box 3662, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710.
Related articles in Annals:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E J Williams, J Green, I Beckingham, R Parks, D Martin, and M Lombard Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) Gut, July 1, 2008; 57(7): 1004 - 1021. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Baillie and P.-A. Testoni Are we meeting the standards set for ERCP? Gut, June 1, 2007; 56(6): 744 - 746. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. J Williams, S. Taylor, P. Fairclough, A. Hamlyn, R. F Logan, D. Martin, S. A Riley, P. Veitch, M. Wilkinson, P. J Williamson, et al. Are we meeting the standards set for endoscopy? Results of a large-scale prospective survey of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatograph practice Gut, June 1, 2007; 56(6): 821 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Shanmugam, G C Beattie, S R Yule, W Reid, and M A Loudon Is magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography the new gold standard in biliary imaging? Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2005; 78(934): 888 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Pastis, P. J. Nietert, G. A. Silvestri, and for the American College of Chest Physicians Inter Variation in Training for Interventional Pulmonary Procedures Among US Pulmonary/Critical Care Fellowships: A Survey of Fellowship Directors Chest, May 1, 2005; 127(5): 1614 - 1621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Falck, M. B. Escobedo, J. G. Baillargeon, L. G. Villard, and J. H. Gunkel Proficiency of Pediatric Residents in Performing Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation Pediatrics, December 1, 2003; 112(6): 1242 - 1247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Ragunath, L A Thomas, W Y Cheung, P D Duane, and D G Richards Objective evaluation of ERCP procedures: a simple grading scale for evaluating technical difficulty Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2003; 79(934): 467 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Melville, A Eastwood, E Morris, and D Forman Management of upper gastrointestinal cancers Qual. Saf. Health Care, March 1, 2001; 10(1): 57 - 64. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J BAILLIE ERCP training: for the few, not for all Gut, July 1, 1999; 45(1): 9 - 10. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A C B WICKS, G S M ROBERTSON, and P S VEITCH Structured training and assessment in ERCP has become essential for the Calman era Gut, July 1, 1999; 45(1): 154 - 156. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mergener and J. Baillie The Role of ERCP in Gallstone Pancreatitis: Mergener K, Baillie J The Role of ERCP in Gallstone Pancreatitis J Intensive Care Med 1999,14 74-85 J Intensive Care Med, March 1, 1999; 14(2): 74 - 85. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Baillie Treatment of Acute Biliary Pancreatitis N. Engl. J. Med., January 23, 1997; 336(4): 286 - 287. [Full Text] |
||||