Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Related articles in Annals
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Klassen, A. C.
space
  arrow  Klassen, D. K.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

IN THE BALANCE

Who Are the Donors in Organ Donation? The Family's Perspective in Mandated Choice

right arrow Ann C. Klassen, PhD, and David K. Klassen, MD

1 July 1996 | Volume 125 Issue 1 | Pages 70-73

Evidence that families requested to permit organ donation refuse half the time has led to proposals for mandated choice.Under mandated choice, a person's donation wishes would be collected and retrieved at death, and requests to families would be avoided.

There are both ethical and logistic problems with mandated choice.The view of the family should be respected in organ requests, even when patient wishes are known. Public sentiment against overriding family wishes could cause low rates of pro-donation registration. Caregivers have usually refused to take organs when families oppose donation. Logistic issues with mandated choice include the cost and complexity of maintaining a national database on donors and the enforcement of registration. No such database of adults currently exists, even for tax purposes. Two states that have mandated choice programs through departments of motor vehicles report relatively low numbers of pro-donation registrants compared with nondonors or undecided persons. Public education and voluntary donor identification hold more potential to increase donation.

Author and Article Information
space

From Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health and University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Requests for Reprints: Ann C. Klassen, PhD, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 729, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. Klassen: Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, Room 729, Baltimore, MD 21205.


Related articles in Annals:

In the Balance
Mandated Choice for Organ Donation: Time To Give It a Try
Aaron Spital
Annals 1996 125: 66-69. [ABSTRACT][Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
E. Moskowitz
Recent Developments in Health Law
J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2005; 33(1): 168 - 187.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. Wendler and N. Dickert
The Consent Process for Cadaveric Organ Procurement: How Does It Work? How Can It Be Improved?
JAMA, January 17, 2001; 285(3): 329 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Physicians.