Annals
Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians
:
Advanced search
 
box Article
 arrow  Table of Contents                
space
 arrow  Full Text of this article Free
space
 arrow  Figures/Tables List
space
box Services
 arrow  Send comment/rapid response letter
space
 arrow  Notify a friend about this article
space
 arrow  Alert me when this article is cited
space
 arrow  Add to Personal Archive
space
 arrow  Download to Citation Manager
space
 arrow  ACP Search                        
space
 arrow  Get Permissions
space
box Google Scholar
 arrow  Search for Related Content
space
box PubMed
Articles in PubMed by Author:
  arrow  Emanuel, L. L.
space
 arrow  Related Articles in PubMed
space
 arrow  PubMed Citation
space
 arrow  PubMed
space

MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES

A Professional Response to Demands for Accountability: Practical Recommendations Regarding Ethical Aspects of Patient Care

right arrow Linda L. Emanuel, MD, PhD

15 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 2 | Pages 240-249

Forceful new demands for accountability in medicine are arising from many interested parties.To maintain professional standards, physicians need to establish which demands are desirable and which are not. We adopt a model of stratified accountability that includes three major components: the accountable parties, the subject matter, and the processes for accountability. To begin describing the model, we focus on physicians and health care institutions. We focus on the ethical dimensions of medical practice, both because the difficulty of measuring such behaviors makes this a test case for accountability and because of the importance of ethical standards in maintaining patient trust.

We first identify eight widely endorsed content areas for accountability in ethical conduct:medical decision making, confidentiality, fiduciary obligations (including conflicts of interest), responsibilities arising from patient vulnerability, personal standards, equity among patients, cultural representation, and procedures for resolving dilemmas. We then identify the currently most valid and reliable methods for assessing conduct: surveys among all involved parties, testing methods used for accreditation, limited audits, publication of policy, and careful use of report cards. A prototypical survey and report card are illustrated. However, we also note the need for improved accountability assessment methods. We next identify mechanisms for taking responsibility: sharing information, exchanging perspectives, making adjustments, and enforcing standards when necessary.

Finally, because this report only begins to describe a small part of the accountability model, we urge explicit identification and development of professional standards for accountability in the many other areas of medicine.

*From Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. For the current author address, see end of text. *For members of and consultants for the Working Group on Accountability, see the Appendix.

Author and Article Information
space

For the Working Group on Accountability*
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Hillel Alpert, Gary Ellis, Dennis Thompson, and four anonymous reviewers.
Grant Support: By the Greenwall Foundation and the DeCamp Foundation.
Requests for Reprints: Linda Emanuel, MD, PhD, Harvard Medical School, Division of Medical Ethics, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
L. Emanuel, R. Cruess, S. Cruess, and J. Hauser
Old values, new challenges: what is a professional to do?
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2002; 14(5): 349 - 351.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
L. G. Pawlson and M. E. O'Kane
Professionalism, Regulation, And The Market: Impact On Accountability For Quality Of Care
Health Aff., May 1, 2002; 21(3): 200 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
L. J DONALDSON
Professional accountability in a changing world
Postgrad. Med. J., February 1, 2001; 77(904): 65 - 67.
[Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
E. J. Emanuel and L. L. Emanuel
Preserving Community in Health Care
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 147 - 184.
[Abstract] [PDF]




 Home | Current Issue | Past Issues | In the Clinic | ACP Journal Club | CME | Collections | Audio/Video | Mobile | Subscribe | Tools | Help | ACP Online 

Copyright © 1996 by the American College of Physicians.