 |
 |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 January 1996 | Volume 124 Issue 2 | Pages 229-239
Accountability has become a major issue in health care.Accountability entails the procedures and processes by which one party justifies and takes responsibility for its activities. The concept of accountability contains three essential components: 1) the loci of accountability—health care consists of at least 11 different parties that can be held accountable or hold others accountable; 2) the domains of accountability—in health care, parties can be held accountable for as many as six activities: professional competence, legal and ethical conduct, financial performance, adequacy of access, public health promotion, and community benefit; and 3) the procedures of accountability, including formal and informal procedures for evaluating compliance with domains and for disseminating the evaluation and responses by the accountable parties.
Different models of accountability stress different domains, evaluative criteria, loci, and procedures.We characterize and compare three dominant models of accountability: 1) the professional model, in which the individual physician and patient participate in shared decision making and physicians are held accountable to professional colleagues and to patients; 2) the economic model, in which the market is brought to bear in health care and accountability is mediated through consumer choice of providers; and 3) the political model, in which physicians and patients interact as citizen-members within a community and in which physicians are accountable to a governing board elected from the members of the community, such as the board of a managed care plan.
We argue that no single model of accountability is appropriate to health care.Instead, we advocate a stratified model of accountability in which the professional model guides the physician-patient relationship, the political model operates within managed care plans and other integrated health delivery networks, and the economic and political models operate in the relations between managed care plans and other groups such as employers, government, and professional associations.
Author and Article Information
From Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
MEDICINE AND PUBLIC ISSUES
What Is Accountability in Health Care?
Requests for Reprints: Ezekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD, Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115.
Current Author Addresses: Dr. E. J. Emanuel: Center for Outcomes and Policy Research, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. S. Adler, S.-W. Kwon, and C. Heckscher Perspective--Professional Work: The Emergence of Collaborative Community Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 359 - 376. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. L. Erde Professionalism's Facets: Ambiguity, Ambivalence, and Nostalgia J Med Philos, February 1, 2008; 33(1): 6 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. M. Glazer and H. H. Goldman Deciphering the Cost Impact of Managed Care in Medicaid Am J Psychiatry, February 1, 2008; 165(2): 171 - 173. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Leatherman and K. Sutherland Designing national quality reforms: a framework for action Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2007; 19(6): 334 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M A Verkerk, M J de Bree, and M J E Mourits Reflective professionalism: interpreting CanMEDS' "professionalism" J. Med. Ethics, November 1, 2007; 33(11): 663 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. J. Povar, H. Blumen, J. Daniel, S. Daub, L. Evans, R. P. Holm, N. Levkovich, A. O. McCarter, J. Sabin, L. Snyder, et al. Ethics in Practice: Managed Care and the Changing Health Care Environment: Medicine as a Profession Managed Care Ethics Working Group Statement Ann Intern Med, July 20, 2004; 141(2): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Leatherman and K. Sutherland Quality of care in the NHS of England BMJ, April 17, 2004; 328(7445): E288 - E290. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. A. Arah, N. S. Klazinga, D. M. J. Delnoij, A. H. A. T. Asbroek, and T. Custers Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement Int. J. Qual. Health Care, October 1, 2003; 15(5): 377 - 398. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. A Kazandjian Can the sum of projects end up in a program? The strategies that shape quality of care research Qual. Saf. Health Care, September 1, 2002; 11(3): 212 - 213. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. J. Eismont, S. Anderson, R. L. Cruess, G. P. DeRosa, G. Kohn, S. Miller, and S. Weinstein Orthopaedic Recertification J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2002; 84(6): 1069 - 1077. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. G. Pawlson and M. E. O'Kane Professionalism, Regulation, And The Market: Impact On Accountability For Quality Of Care Health Aff., May 1, 2002; 21(3): 200 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. Cruess, S. R. Cruess, and S. E. Johnston Professionalism and Medicine's Social Contract J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2000; 82(8): 1189 - 1189. [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Shortell, T. M. Waters, K. W. B. Clarke, and P. P. Budetti Physicians as Double Agents: Maintaining Trust in an Era of Multiple Accountabilities JAMA, September 23, 1998; 280(12): 1102 - 1108. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. S. Feldman, D. H. Novack, and E. Gracely Effects of Managed Care on Physician-Patient Relationships, Quality of Care, and the Ethical Practice of Medicine: A Physician Survey Arch Intern Med, August 10, 1998; 158(15): 1626 - 1632. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. J. Emanuel and L. L. Emanuel Preserving Community in Health Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 147 - 184. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
Article
